Literature DB >> 28468757

Relationship between fibrillin-1 genotype and severity of cardiovascular involvement in Marfan syndrome.

Romy Franken1,2, Gisela Teixido-Tura1, Maria Brion3, Alberto Forteza4, Jose Rodriguez-Palomares1, Laura Gutierrez1, David Garcia Dorado1, Gerard Pals5, Barbara Jm Mulder2,6, Artur Evangelista7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of FBN1 mutation type on the severity of cardiovascular manifestations in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) has been reported with disparity results.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the impact of the FBN1 mutation type on aortic diameters, aortic dilation rates and on cardiovascular events (ie, aortic dissection and cardiovascular mortality).
METHODS: MFS patients with a pathogenic FBN1 mutation followed at two specialised units were included. FBN1 mutations were classified as being dominant negative (DN; incorporation of non-mutated and mutated fibrillin-1 in the extracellular matrix) or having haploinsufficiency (HI; only incorporation of non-mutated fibrillin-1, thus a decreased amount of fibrillin-1 protein). Aortic diameters and the aortic dilation rate at the level of the aortic root, ascending aorta, arch, descending thoracic aorta and abdominal aorta by echocardiography and clinical endpoints comprising dissection and death were compared between HI and DN patients.
RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety patients with MFS were included: 113 (39%) with an HI-FBN1 mutation and 177 (61%) with a DN-FBN1. At baseline, patients with HI-FBN1 had a larger aortic root diameter than patients with DN-FBN1 (HI: 39.3±7.2 mm vs DN: 37.3±6.8 mm, p=0.022), with no differences in age or body surface area. After a mean follow-up of 4.9±2.0 years, aortic root and ascending dilation rates were increased in patients with HI-FBN1 (HI: 0.57±0.8 vs DN: 0.28±0.5 mm/year, p=0.004 and HI: 0.59±0.9 vs DN: 0.30±0.7 mm/year, p=0.032, respectively). Furthermore, patients with HI-FBN1 tended to be at increased risk for the combined endpoint of dissection and death compared with patients with DN-FBN1 (HR: 3.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 11.4, p=0.060).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an HI mutation had a more severely affected aortic phenotype, with larger aortic root diameters and a more rapid dilation rate, and tended to have an increased risk of death and dissections compared with patients with a DN mutation. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FBN1; Marfan syndrome; aortic dilation; aortic dissection; haploinsufficiency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28468757     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  30 in total

Review 1.  Role of Clinical Genetic Testing in the Management of Aortopathies.

Authors:  Stephanie L Harris; Mark E Lindsay
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Neuregulin (NRG-1β) Is Pro-Myogenic and Anti-Cachectic in Respiratory Muscles of Post-Myocardial Infarcted Swine.

Authors:  Cristi L Galindo; Van Thuan Nguyen; Braxton Hill; Ethan Easterday; John H Cleator; Douglas B Sawyer
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Exome Sequencing Identifies Genetic Variants Associated with Extreme Manifestations of the Cardiovascular Phenotype in Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Yanireth Jimenez; Cesar Paulsen; Eduardo Turner; Sebastian Iturra; Oscar Cuevas; Guillermo Lay-Son; Gabriela M Repetto; Marcelo Rojas; Juan F Calderon
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 4.  Potential predictors of severe cardiovascular involvement in Marfan syndrome: the emphasized role of genotype-phenotype correlations in improving risk stratification-a literature review.

Authors:  Zoltán Szabolcs; Kálmán Benke; Roland Stengl; Bence Ágg; Miklós Pólos; Gábor Mátyás; Gábor Szabó; Béla Merkely; Tamás Radovits
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 5.  Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Dianna M Milewicz; Alan C Braverman; Julie De Backer; Shaine A Morris; Catherine Boileau; Irene H Maumenee; Guillaume Jondeau; Arturo Evangelista; Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 65.038

Review 6.  Pathogenic Mechanisms of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy.

Authors:  Noor M Yassine; Jasmine T Shahram; Simon C Body
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Angiotensin, transforming growth factor β and aortic dilatation in Marfan syndrome: Of mice and humans.

Authors:  Christopher Yu; Richmond W Jeremy
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2018-03-12

8.  Identification of Novel Causal FBN1 Mutations in Pedigrees of Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Yueli Wang; Xiaoyan Li; Rongjuan Li; Ya Yang; Jie Du
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Acromelic dysplasias: how rare musculoskeletal disorders reveal biological functions of extracellular matrix proteins.

Authors:  Sarah Stanley; Zerina Balic; Dirk Hubmacher
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Children: The Impact of FBN1 Variants on Pediatric Marfan Care.

Authors:  Veronika C Stark; Flemming Hensen; Kerstin Kutsche; Fanny Kortüm; Jakob Olfe; Peter Wiegand; Yskert von Kodolitsch; Rainer Kozlik-Feldmann; Götz C Müller; Thomas S Mir
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.