| Literature DB >> 28466663 |
Xu-Xin Zhang1,2, Yun-Feng Cao2,3,4, Li-Xuan Wang2,4, Xiao-Lin Yuan1, Zhong-Ze Fang2,4,5.
Abstract
CONTENTS: Danshen is a popular herb employed to treat cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases worldwide. Danshen-drug interaction has not been well studied.Entities:
Keywords: Enzyme inhibition; herb–drug interaction; in vitro screening; in vitro–in vivo extrapolation (IV-IVE)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28466663 PMCID: PMC6130658 DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2015.1045621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
Figure 1.The structures of tanshinone I, tanshinone IIA, cryptotanshinone, and dihydrotanshinone I.
Initial screening of the inhibitory effects of danshen's major components towards UGTs. The values are given as mean plus SD (n = 3).
| Tanshinone I | Tanshinone IIA | Cryptotanshinone | Dihydrotanshinone I | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UGT1A1 | 77.2 ± 2.8 | 69.8 ± 1.3 | 43.5 ± 1.2 | 67.3 ± 17.5 |
| UGT1A3 | 68.2 ± 3.4 | 46.7 ± 1.6 | 22.2 ± 0.0 | 38.5 ± 0.4 |
| UGT1A6 | 42.7 ± 0.5 | 38.7 ± 14.2 | 13.7 ± 3.4 | 38.9 ± 0.4 |
| UGT1A7 | 25.8 ± 2.2 | 24.9 ± 2.4 | 7.2 ± 0.7 | 22.5 ± 9.3 |
| UGT1A8 | 97.5 ± 1.7 | 79.7 ± 3.0 | 33.1 ± 7.6 | 52.1 ± 0.4 |
| UGT1A9 | 29.9 ± 0.6 | 14.7 ± 3.1 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 8.0 ± 0.0 |
| UGT1A10 | 74.6 ± 2.2 | 56.8 ± 1.6 | 13.3 ± 4.8 | 37.2 ± 0.0 |
| UGT2B7 | 67.6 ± 2.9 | 58.3 ± 0.2 | 12.8 ± 0.5 | 44.1 ± 6.6 |
| UGT2B15 | 58.1 ± 0.8 | 65.6 ± 5.2 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 28.6 ± 0.4 |
Figure 2.Determination of the half inhibition concentration (IC50). (A) The half inhibition concentration (IC50) of cryptotanshinone towards UGT1A7. (B) The half inhibition concentration (IC50) of cryptotanshinone towards UGT1A9. (C) The half inhibition concentration (IC50) of dihydrotanshinone I towards UGT1A9. Every data point represents the mean of two replicates.
Figure 3.Inhibition of UGT1A7-mediated 4-MU glucuronidation reaction by cryptotanshinone. (A) Dixon plot of inhibitory effects of cryptotanshinone towards recombinant UGT1A7-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. (B) Lineweaver–Burk plot of inhibitory effects of cryptotanshinone towards recombinant UGT1A7-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. (C) Second plot of slopes from Lineweaver–Burk plot versus cryptotanshinone concentrations. Every data point represents the mean of two replicates.
Figure 4.Inhibition of UGT1A9-mediated 4-MU glucuronidation reaction by cryptotanshinone. (A) Dixon plot of inhibitory effects of cryptotanshinone towards recombinant UGT1A9-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. (B) Lineweaver–Burk plot of inhibitory effects of cryptotanshinone towards recombinant UGT1A9-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. (C) Second plot of slopes from Lineweaver–Burk plot versus cryptotanshinone concentrations. Every data point represents the mean of two replicates.
Figure 5.Inhibition of UGT1A9-mediated 4-MU glucuronidation reaction by dihydrotanshinone I. (A) Dixon plot of inhibitory effects of dihydrotanshinone I towards recombinant UGT1A9-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. (B) Lineweaver–Burk plot of inhibitory effects of dihydrotanshinone I towards recombinant UGT1A9-catalyzed 4-MU glucuronidation. (C) Second plot of slopes from Lineweaver–Burk plot versus dihydrotanshinone I concentrations. Every data point represents the mean of two replicates.
Figure 6.The curve of AUC/AUC versus f. (A) The f-dependent change of AUCi/AUC due to the inhibition of cryptotanshinone towards UGT1A7. (B) The f-dependent change of AUCi/AUC due to the inhibition of cryptotanshinone towards UGT1A9. (C) The f-dependent change of AUCi/AUC due to the inhibition of dihydrotanshinone I towards UGT1A9.