Literature DB >> 28466557

The BCR-ABL1 transcript type influences response and outcome in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated frontline with imatinib.

Fausto Castagnetti1, Gabriele Gugliotta1, Massimo Breccia2, Alessandra Iurlo3, Luciano Levato4, Francesco Albano5, Paolo Vigneri6, Elisabetta Abruzzese7, Giuseppe Rossi8, Serena Rupoli9, Francesco Cavazzini10, Bruno Martino11, Ester Orlandi12, Patrizia Pregno13, Mario Annunziata14, Emilio Usala15, Mario Tiribelli16, Simona Sica17, Massimiliano Bonifacio18, Carmen Fava19, Filippo Gherlinzoni20, Monica Bocchia21, Simona Soverini1, Maria Teresa Bochicchio1, Michele Cavo1, Martinelli Giovanni1, Giuseppe Saglio19, Fabrizio Pane22, Michele Baccarani23, Gianantonio Rosti1.   

Abstract

The most frequent BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are the e13a2 (b2a2) and the e14a2 (b3a2) ones. In the imatinib era few studies addressing the prognostic significance of the BCR-ABL1 transcript type in early chronic phase CML have been published. Overall, these studies suggest that in e14a2 patients the response to imatinib is faster and deeper. To evaluate if the BCR-ABL1 transcript type (e13a2 compared to e14a2) affect the response to imatinib and the clinical outcome in newly diagnosed adult CML patients, 559 patients enrolled in 3 prospective studies (NCT00514488, NCT00510926, observational study CML/023) were analyzed. A qualitative PCR was performed at baseline: 52% patients had a e14a2 transcript, 37% a e13a2 transcript, 11% co-expressed both transcripts and 1% had other rare transcripts. The median follow-up was 76 months (95% of the patients had at least a 5-year observation). The complete cytogenetic response rates were comparable in e14a2 and e13a2 patients. The median time to MR3.0 (6 and 12 months) and MR4.0 (41 and 61 months) was significantly shorter for e14a2 patients compared to e13a2 patients, with a higher cumulative probability of MR3.0 (88% and 83%, P < .001) and MR4.0 (67% and 52%, P = .001). The 7-year overall survival (90% and 83%, P = .017), progression-free survival (89% and 81%, P = .005) and failure-free survival (71% and 54%, P < .001) were significantly better in patients with e14a2 transcript. In conclusion, patients with e13a2 transcript had a slower molecular response with inferior response rates to imatinib and a poorer long-term outcome.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28466557     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  20 in total

Review 1.  The argument for using imatinib in CML.

Authors:  Simone Claudiani; Jane F Apperley
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 2.  Early Management of CML.

Authors:  Naranie Shanmuganathan; Timothy P Hughes
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Chronic-Phase CML: Strategies for Frontline Decision-making.

Authors:  James A Kennedy; Gabriela Hobbs
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.952

4.  Heterogeneous BCR-ABL1 signal patterns identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization are associated with leukemic clonal evolution and poorer prognosis in BCR-ABL1 positive leukemia.

Authors:  Zhanglin Zhang; Zhiwei Chen; Mei Jiang; Shuyuan Liu; Yang Guo; Lagen Wan; Fei Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Signaling pathways involved in chronic myeloid leukemia pathogenesis: The importance of targeting Musashi2-Numb signaling to eradicate leukemia stem cells.

Authors:  Foruzan Moradi; Sadegh Babashah; Majid Sadeghizadeh; Arsalan Jalili; Abbas Hajifathali; Hajifathali Roshandel
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  The Q-LAMP Method Represents a Valid and Rapid Alternative for the Detection of the BCR-ABL1 Rearrangement in Philadelphia-Positive Leukemias.

Authors:  Stefania Stella; Enrico Marco Gottardi; Valeria Favout; Eva Barragan Gonzalez; Santa Errichiello; Silvia Rita Vitale; Carmen Fava; Luigia Luciano; Fabio Stagno; Francesco Grimaldi; Lucrezia Pironi; Claudia Sargas Simarro; Paolo Vigneri; Barbara Izzo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Effect of HSP90AB1 and CC domain interaction on Bcr-Abl protein cytoplasm localization and function in chronic myeloid leukemia cells.

Authors:  Yuhang Peng; Zhenglan Huang; Fangzhu Zhou; Teng Wang; Ke Mou; Wenli Feng
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 8.  NPM1 Mutated, BCR-ABL1 Positive Myeloid Neoplasms: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Gianfranco Catalano; Pasquale Niscola; Cristina Banella; Daniela Diverio; Malgorzata Monika Trawinska; Stefano Fratoni; Rita Iazzoni; Paolo De Fabritiis; Elisabetta Abruzzese; Nelida Ines Noguera
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 9.  Prognostic Significance of Transcript-Type BCR - ABL1 in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Matteo Molica; Elisabetta Abruzzese; Massimo Breccia
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.576

10.  Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Harboring Atypical BCR-ABL1 Transcripts.

Authors:  Matteo Dragani; Jessica Petiti; Giovanna Rege-Cambrin; Enrico Gottardi; Filomena Daraio; Giovanni Caocci; Chiara Aguzzi; Elena Crisà; Giacomo Andreani; Francesca Caciolli; Carmen Fava
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.