| Literature DB >> 28465881 |
Ines Monte1, Vera Elena Bottari1, Sergio Buccheri1, Anita Blundo1, Luana Sirugo1, Stefano Leggio1, Salvatore Licciardi1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In our study, we aimed to identify early markers of cardiac dysfunction in patients treated with mitoxantrone. We also looked at cardiac functional changes during therapy by analyzing longitudinal deformation and by measuring left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) global strain.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac dysfunction; cardiotoxicity; echocardiography; longitudinal deformation
Year: 2013 PMID: 28465881 PMCID: PMC5353441 DOI: 10.4103/2211-4122.117983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Echogr ISSN: 2211-4122
Results and echocardiographic characteristics of the patients in the study
| N | MS_T0 | MS_T5 | MS_T10 | MS_FU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Months | — | 0 | 6,5 ±2 | 12,4±2 | 10,7±1,1 |
| LVIDd mm | 50,1±3 | 49,3±5 | 48,8±6 | 49,1±6 | 49,6±6 |
| LVIDs mm | 31,1±4 | 30,7±4 | 30,5±4 | 30,8±6 | 31,2±6 |
| LVEF % | 66,8±4 | 68,3±4 | 66,1±5# | 66,5±5 | 66,6 ±6 |
| LAVi ml/m2 | 24,8±6 | 25,7±6 | 24,7±7 | 26,5±6° | 24,8±4 (*) |
| E cm/s | 79,2±28 | 68,2±15 | 67,2±16 | 60,9±14° # | 68,6±11 |
| A cm/s | 57,7±16 | 59,3±13 | 56,4±16 | 57,4±12 | 59,7±13 |
| E/A | 1,2±0,4 | 1,2±0,4 | 1,3±0,4 | 1,2±0,4 | 1,2±0,3 |
| S’ cm/s | 7,1±1,7 | 7,3±1,6 | 7,0±1,4 | 6,1±1,4° # | 6,7±1,5 (*) |
| E’ cm/s | 9,5±0,1 | 9,7±2,4 | 9,7±2,0 | 7,9±2,4° ## | 9,9±2,5 (**) |
| A’ cm/s | 8,9±1,9 | 8,9±2,0 | 8,8±2,2 | 8,9±1,8 | 8,7±1,8 |
| E/E’ | 7,4±2,5 | 7,3±2,1 | 7,1±1,9 | 8,7±2,2° | 7,3±1,6 (**) |
| MPI | 0,48±0,2 | 0,55±0,1° | 0,65±0,2°° | 0,66±0,2°° | 0,55±0,1° |
| LV_GS % | –17,5±3,8 | –17,4±3,8 | –16,4±3,5° # | –16,4±2,5°# | –17,3±3,3 (*) |
| LA_GS % | 20,0±6.8 | 20,2±11,1 | 20,7±14,8 | 15,2±12,5°# | 20,4±15,7 (**) |
°p<0.05°° p<0.001°°° p<0.0001: MS (T0, T5, T10, FU) vs N;# p<0.05 ## p<0.001 ### p<0.0001: MS (T0, T5, T10, FU) vs MS_T0;(*) p<0.05(**) p<0.001 (***) p<0.0001: MS_FU vs MS_T10 Where, LV=Left ventricle; LVIDd=LV Dimension diastolic; LVIDs=LV Dimension systolic; LVEF=LV ejection fraction; LAVi=left atrial volume indexed for body surface area. Peak mitral inflow velocity: E early diastolic filling andA late diastolic filling, E/A=ratio between E and A. Tissue velocity at mitral annulus: S’ longitudinal peak systolic,E’ longitudinal peak early diastolic, A’ longitudinal peak late diastolic; E/E’=ratio between E and E’; MPI=myocardialial performance index; LV_GS=LV longitudinal global strain; LA_GS=left atrial longitudinal global strain. MS=multiple sclerosis. MS_T0=time at the beginning of mithoxantrone therapy; MS_T5=time after five months of therapy; MS_T10=time after ten months of therapy; MS_FU=follow up without treatment
Figure 1Values of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF %), longitudinal peak systolic velocity at mitral annulus (S’ cm/s) and left ventricle longitudinal global strain of (LV_GS %) at the beginning of mithoxantrone therapy (MS_T0), after five (MS_T5) and ten months (MS_T10) of therapy, and follow up without treatment (MS_FU). MS = patients with multiple sclerosis
Figure 2Values of left atrial volume indexed for body surface (LAVI ml/m2), left atrial longitudinal global strain of (LA_GS %), longitudinal peak early diastolic velocity at mitral annulus (E’ cm/s) and ratio between peak mitral inflow early diastolic filling (E) and E’ (E/E’), at the beginning of mithoxantrone therapy (MS_T0), after five (MS_T5) and ten months (MS_T10) of therapy, and follow up without treatment (MS_FU). MS = patients with multiple sclerosis
Figure 3Values of myocardial performance index (MPI) at the beginning of mithoxantrone therapy (MS_T0), after five (MS_T5) and ten months (MS_T10) of therapy, and follow up without treatment (MS_FU). MS = patients with multiple sclerosis