Literature DB >> 28465764

Sociodemographic Determinants of Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Patients Using Prescription Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Kumar Mukherjee1, Khalid M Kamal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that has a substantial economic impact on patients. Patients with RA are at an increased risk for disability and for loss of income. The inclusion of biologic drugs in RA therapy has increased the cost of treatment. Little is known about the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and the out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures for prescription drugs for patients with RA, including biologics, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and analgesics.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics, personal characteristics, and OOP expenditures associated with RA prescription medications. A secondary objective was to measure the average OOP expenditures for different therapeutic classes of RA medications, including biologics, DMARDs, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, and analgesics.
METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from 2009 to 2012, we identified a patient sample of 1090 adults with RA, which represented approximately 9.71 million patients in the MEPS database. The total OOP expenditure was calculated based on the OOP expenditure for each prescription drug corresponding to an individual. Patient variables included age, race, sex, insurance status, number of comorbid conditions, region, area of living, annual family income, and marital status. Logistic regression and generalized linear models were used for analysis. The mean OOP expenditure for therapeutic classes was estimated using nonparametric percentiles from 1000 cluster bootstrap estimates.
RESULTS: Overall, the mean annual OOP expenditure was $273.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], $197.07-$364.75). The OOP expenditures were lower for privately insured (0.31; 95% CI, 0.21-0.45) patients and publicly insured (0.18; 95% CI, 0.12-0.27) patients versus uninsured patients, and for poor (0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.84) and low-income (0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.97) patients versus high-income patients. The mean annual OOP expenditure decreased with age (0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), was lower (0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92) for male patients than for female patients, and increased with the presence of comorbidities (1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.25). The average annual OOP expenditure was highest for biologics ($2556.73), followed by DMARDs ($89.37). The average annual OOP expenditures were $27.97, $52.36, and $72.51 for corticosteroids, NSAIDs, and narcotic analgesics, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Age, sex, race, income level, insurance status, and comorbidity status significantly affected patient OOP expenditure. Higher OOP expenditures among the uninsured, female patients, patients with low income levels, and patients with several comorbidities could adversely affect RA therapy. The use of expensive biologics needs to be monitored to reduce prescription-related cost-sharing among patients with RA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; analgesics; biologics; comorbidities; corticosteroids; disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; generalized linear model; income level; insurance status; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; out-of-pocket expenditures; prescription drugs; rheumatoid arthritis; sociodemographics; uninsured patients

Year:  2017        PMID: 28465764      PMCID: PMC5394540     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits        ISSN: 1942-2962


  25 in total

1.  Benefit design and specialty drug use.

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; Geoffrey F Joyce; Grant Lawless; William H Crown; Vincent Willey
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Insurers' strategies for managing the use and cost of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  James C Robinson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  American College of Rheumatology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kenneth G Saag; Gim Gee Teng; Nivedita M Patkar; Jeremy Anuntiyo; Catherine Finney; Jeffrey R Curtis; Harold E Paulus; Amy Mudano; Maria Pisu; Mary Elkins-Melton; Ryan Outman; Jeroan J Allison; Maria Suarez Almazor; S Louis Bridges; W Winn Chatham; Marc Hochberg; Catherine MacLean; Ted Mikuls; Larry W Moreland; James O'Dell; Anthony M Turkiewicz; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-06-15

4.  When patients have to pay a share of drug costs: effects on frequency of physician visits, hospital admissions and filling of prescriptions.

Authors:  Aslam H Anis; Daphne P Guh; Diane Lacaille; Carlo A Marra; Amir A Rashidi; Xin Li; John M Esdaile
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  A review of the direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis: managed care versus fee-for-service settings.

Authors:  D P Lubeck
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  An assessment of the annual and long-term direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of poor function and functional decline.

Authors:  E Yelin; L A Wanke
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-06

7.  The impact of cost sharing of prescription drug expenditures on health care utilization by the elderly: own- and cross-price elasticities.

Authors:  Xin Li; Daphne Guh; Diane Lacaille; John Esdaile; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Direct medical costs and their predictors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a three-year study of 7,527 patients.

Authors:  Kaleb Michaud; Jodi Messer; Hyon K Choi; Frederick Wolfe
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-10

9.  Compliance with biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: do patient out-of-pocket payments matter?

Authors:  S Curkendall; V Patel; M Gleeson; R S Campbell; M Zagari; R Dubois
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-10-15

Review 10.  Epidemiology and burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Tore K Kvien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  4 in total

1.  Patient-provider communication about medication cost in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  K Julia Kaal; Nick Bansback; Marie Hudson; Aslam Anis; Cheryl Koehn; Mark Harrison
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Primary versus secondary source of data in observational studies and heterogeneity in meta-analyses of drug effects: a survey of major medical journals.

Authors:  Guillermo Prada-Ramallal; Fatima Roque; Maria Teresa Herdeiro; Bahi Takkouche; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.

Authors:  Nicole Atkins; Karim Mukhida
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2022-09-01

4.  Accessibility to biologics and its impact on disease activity and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Kuwait.

Authors:  Adeeba Al-Herz; Khuloud Saleh; Adel Al-Awadhi; Waleed Al-Kandari; Eman Hasan; Aqeel Ghanem; Mohammed Hussain; Yaser Ali; Ebrahim Nahar; Ahmad Alenizi; Sawsan Hayat; Fatemah Abutiban; Ali Aldei; Hebah Alhajeri; Naser Alhadhood; Husain Bahbahani; Hoda Tarakmeh; Khaled Mokaddem; Ahmad Khadrawy; Ammad Fazal; Agaz Zaman; Ghada Mazloum; Youssef Bartella; Sally Hamed; Ramia Alsouk; Ahmed Al-Saber
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.980

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.