Review of major sweetpotato pests in Japan, with information on resistance breeding programs.

Sweetpotato (Ipomoeae batatas (L.) Lam.) is an important food crop affected by several pests throughout the world, especially in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions. Although Japan is relatively free from many serious sweetpotato pests, some pests, especially soil-borne pathogens, viruses, and insects such as plant-parasitic nematodes and weevils, cause severe damage in Japan. In this review, we describe the current status and management options for sweetpotato pests and diseases in Japan and review research related to sweetpotato breeding that can promote resistance to these problems. Furthermore, we describe methods to evaluate resistance to pests and disease used in sweetpotato breeding at the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO).

Introduction

The sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., is currently ranked as the seventh most important crop in the world with a total production of 103 million tons in 2013 (FAOSTAT 2015). It is produced largely in Asia (accounting for up to 76.1% of world production in 2013), followed by the African continent (19.5%) (FAOSTAT 2015). The top five sweetpotato-producing nations in 2014 were China, Nigeria, Uganda, Indonesia, and the United Republic of Tanzania (FAOSTAT 2015). After the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), sweetpotato is the third most important root crop in the world (FAO 1998). Sweetpotato is an important crop in tropical, subtropical, and temperate areas, and it is an efficient producer of starch.

The local crop production system influences exposure of sweetpotatoes to disease and insect pests. Sweetpotato is an indeterminate plant that is usually grown as an annual crop. In tropical regions, it can be grown all year long and is typically propagated from vine cuttings taken from other production fields. In temperate and subtropical regions, where winters are too harsh for year-long production, roots are stored over the winter and used to produce slips to transplant during the following season. It is not always clear how local environments, differences in susceptibility of local cultivars, or differences in occurrence of pathogens and insects contribute to location-based differences in the occurrence of pests. Several diseases and pests are transmitted from one season to the next by their ability to infect storage roots and are more problematic in temperate production systems. Some diseases and pests mainly occur in plant beds used in temperate production systems to produce slips from storage roots.

Although sweetpotato is susceptible to over 40 diseases, 20 viruses, and 40 species of insect pests worldwide (Clark , Loebenstein , Sorensen 2009), it is relatively free from several serious pests in Japan. However, black rot plant bed disease (Ceratocystis fimbriata), soil rot (Streptomyces ipomoeae), stem rot (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. batatas), and some viral diseases have been reported in Japan. Southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita), three genera of Lepidoptera (Aedia, Helcystogramma, Spodoptera), beetles (Anomala spp.), and two genera of weevils [Cylas formicarius (Fabricius) and Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaure)] have also been reported in Japan. Pests occurring in plant beds as well as soil-borne pests/pathogens, viruses, and plant-parasitic nematodes are the major pests, and they cause considerable damage to sweetpotatoes in temperate regions of Japan (Honsyu, Kyusyu, and Shikoku). In particular, two genera of weevils cause serious damage to sweetpotato production in the subtropical to tropical southwestern island region of Japan, including the Okinawa prefecture.

This review focuses on problems facing sweetpotato cultivation in Japan, including soil rot (Streptomyces ipomoeae), viral disease (caused by Sweet potato feathery mottle virus), southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita), and two genera of weevils [Cylas formicarius (Fabricius) and Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaure)] (Fig. 1). Resistant cultivars are effective for management of these pests: therefore, we describe a recent study on breeding of resistant cultivars and genetic analyses of resistant sweetpotato genes. Furthermore, we evaluated the resistance to stem rot, soil rot, black rot, southern root-knot nematode and coffee root-lesion nematode in our breeding program in National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), and report an outline of information and evaluation methods for the breeding program.

Fig. 1

Major sweetpotato disease and pests. A: Streptomyces soil rot caused by Streptomyces ipomoeae. B: Russet cruck disease symptoms caused by sweet potato feathery mottle virus server strain, called ‘Obijyo-sohi’ in Japan. C: Storage roots of susceptible sweetpotato cultivar ‘Koganesengan’ infested by root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.). (Courtesy M. Suzuki) D: Adults of sweetpotato weevil (Cylas formicarius (Fabricius)). E: Adults of West Indian sweetpotato weevil (Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaure)). F: Invaded storage root by weevils.

Soil rot

Streptomyces soil rot or pox is a destructive disease of sweetpotato that is caused by the soil-borne actinomycetes Streptomyces ipomoeae (Person and Martin) Waksman and Henrici. Soil rot in sweetpotatoes was first described by Halsted in 1890. Soil rot was initially thought to have a fungal etiology until 1929, when the causal agent was identified as an actinomycete bacteria, Actinomyces pox (Loria ). The pathogen was renamed Actinomyces ipomoeae by Person and Martin in 1940, then S. ipomoeae (Person and Martin) Waksman and Henrici, and finally S. ipomoeae by Waksman in 1957 (Locci 1994). Occurrence of soil rot in Japan was recognized around 1946 in Nagasaki (Suzui 1987), and the causal pathogen was identified by Suzui .

After transplanting slips to the field infested with the soil-rot pathogen, the pathogen infects fibrous roots. Infected fibrous roots become necrotic and decay. Small, elongated, black sunken cankers may develop on the slips below ground, stunting the vine, causing bronzing and chlorosis in foliage and eventual plant death and decreasing crop yield (Clark and Moyer 1988a, Locci 1994, Loria ). In addition, the disease decreases crop quality by causing necrotic lesions on storage roots, which make the product unmarketable. Symptoms on the root include scab lesions, which are circular to somewhat irregular in outline, and are usually <5-mm deep and 3 cm in diameter.

Several environmental factors affect the incidence of soil rot. Soil pH appears to have the largest influence. Soil rot does not develop in soil with pH <5.2, and disease severity increases progressively as the pH increases to >5.2 (Clark and Moyer 1988a). Similarly, Ogawa reported minimal disease development in soil at pH ≤4.5, and more severe disease development above at pH ≥6.0 (Kudo 1985). Soil temperature also influences the disease. The disease develops in the range of 25°C–40°C, with an optimum temperature of approximately 35°C, and no development in soil <20°C (Kudo 1985). Poole (1925) showed a negative correlation between the soil moisture levels and disease. The development of soil rot is favored by relatively dry soil (Clark and Moyer 1988a). High soil water content stimulates a more rapid development of roots and allows a diseased plant with a deficient root system to absorb the water and essential salts more easily from the soil (Locci 1994).

The most effective management strategies are the use of resistant cultivars. Several resistant cultivars have been released in the United States to provide soil-rot control (Loria ). However, highly resistant cultivars were not developed in Japan and only a moderately resistant cultivar ‘Beniazuma’ has been released (Shiga ). Evaluating sweetpotato genotypes for resistance to soil rot is important to produce resistant cultivars and generally takes place on naturally infested fields. However, field tests have continually changing environmental conditions and relatively large experimental error. Furthermore, securing the infested field is labor-intensive and time-intensive. Therefore, several methods to evaluate sweetpotato genotypes for resistance to soil rot have been developed using a laboratory or greenhouse. Moyer evaluated stem cutting and root slices for resistance to soil rot, after 10 weeks of growth in infested sand under greenhouse condition and after incubation on infested sand, respectively, for 7–14 days at 30°C. Ino and Takano evaluated sweetpotato slips for resistance to soil rot after growth in cups with infested soil incubated in a thermobath to precisely control soil temperature. Iuchi developed methods to evaluate resistance to soil rot inoculating by small vine cuttings and storage root slices. These methods can help screen for resistance, especially in breeding programs where field test cannot be performed. The first soil rot resistant cultivar ‘Jasper’ was released in the United States in 1975 (Clark ). Subsequently, ‘Travis’, ‘Eureka’, and ‘Beauregard’ have been released. These cultivars have significant levels of resistance. In Japan, the moderately resistant cultivar ‘Beniazuma’ exhibited the strongest resistance against soil rot among the existing cultivars (Ino , Iuchi , Kuranouchi , Takano ). In addition, ‘90IDN-47’ was selected as a resistant line from genetic resources of sweetpotato, and has been used for breeding material (Kuranouchi ).

Virus diseases

Viral diseases among sweetpotatoes are widespread and can cause serious damage to the plants. Sweetpotatoes are vegetables propagated from vines, root slips, or storage roots, and farmers often take vines for propagation from their own fields. Thus, if viruses are present in the field 1 year, they will be transmitted with the propagation material to the newly planted field, potentially impacting yield. The sweetpotato is prone to infection by sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV). Numerous viruses infect sweetpotatoes worldwide (Clark and Moyer 1988b, Cohen , Moyer , Moyer and Larsen 1991, Moyer and Salazar 1989, Rossel 1981). These include sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (Cohen , Hoyer , 1996b), sweet potato leaf curl virus (SPLCV) (Chung , Green , Liang , Osaki and Inouye 1991) and ipomoea crinkle leaf curl virus. However, they have not been comprehensively described. Five of these viruses have been reported in Japan: SPFMV (Usugi ), SPLCV (Usugi ), sweet potato latent virus (Usugi ), sweet potato symptomless virus (Usugi ) and sweet potato virus G (Sakai ).

SPFMV has serious impacts on sweetpotato production and quality, and a severe strain causes ‘obijo-sohi’ disease in Japan. The russet crack strain (RC) has been isolated in the United States (Cali and Moyer 1981), and the severe strain (S) has been isolated in Japan (Usugi ). In addition, the reported strains in Japan included the ordinary (O) strain (Mori ), Tokushima (T) strain (Sakai ), and protective mild strain (JC) of SPFMV (Yamasaki ). SPFMV is transmitted by aphids (Myzus persicae) and the infected tuberous roots are used for vegetative propagation. As a result, the disease spreads rapidly in the field and does not respond to pesticides. Because the virus is not transmitted to the seed, clean seed stocks can be produced. However, because of the possibility of segregating agricultural phenotypes, propagation by the seeds is neither economical nor common. Shoot-apex culture has been used to overcome virus damage to sweetpotatoes in Japan (Nagata 1984). This method supplies virus-free young sweetpotatoes, but it is costly, and sweetpotatoes can still become infected after cultivation. Breeding of SPFMV-resistant plants was initiated by CIP (Mihovilovich ). Prior efforts of virus resistance breeding focused on control of SPFMV given its universal distribution. However, many sweetpotato cultivars are naturally resistant to SPFMV, either showing no symptoms or recovering from mild initial symptoms, and demonstrating very low-virus titers (Kokkinos and Clark 2006). Several clones that were resistant to SPFMV in CIPs tests were susceptible when exposed to Israeli and Ugandan isolates (Karyeija ). Strain diversity appears to require that breeding and selection take place in various locations. On the other hand, a substantial number of African sweetpotato landraces have resistance to this virus (Carey ). Another approach was to develop transgenic sweetpotatoes with coat-protein mediated resistance to SPFMV (Okada , 2002, 2008a, 2008b). This type of resistance has been successful against a number of viruses in several crop species (Latham and Wilson 2008). However, resistance that works under controlled experimental conditions may not necessarily work in the field.

Southern root-knot nematode

The southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, is one of the most destructive pests. It is generally found in most areas where sweetpotatoes are grown worldwide, and attacks not only sweetpotato but also thousands of agronomic plants (Overstreet 2009). This nematode infects a wide range of plants, interfering with crop rotation and making it difficult to expel. Especially in Japan, this species is a primary sweetpotato pest. In the central and southern region of Kyushu including Kagoshima, Miyazaki and Kumamoto prefectures, major production area for sweetpotatoes, 96% of Meloidogyne spp. found in most sweetpotato fields were identified as M. incognita (Iwahori ). This species was also detected in the northern region of Kanto including Ibaraki and Chiba prefectures, the second major production area for sweetpotato (Iwahori , Yoshida 1965). Sano and Iwahori (2005) indicated that nine races, SP1 to SP9, were identified from 129 populations collected from Kyushu and Okinawa, Japan, based on different responses to five sweetpotato cultivars. A primary race differed by region: SP1 was predominant in central and northern region in Kyushu, SP2 in southern region in Kyushu, and SP4 and SP6 in Okinawa. SP4 and SP6 were also identified in Ibaraki and Chiba (Momota ).

Clark and Mayer (1988c), Overstreet (2009) and other researchers described symptoms and agronomic damage caused by this species. Characteristic symptoms include round to spindle-shaped swelling (galls), which have often egg masses on its surface, on the fibrous sweetpotato roots. Cracks, holes, constrictions, or blisters decrease storage root quality. Yield loss of storage roots also occurred, resulting lower yield of marketable production (Nielsen and Sasser 1959). Agu (2004) reported that nematode infection reduced shoot growth, shoot-to-storage root ratio and days to maturity as well as marketable yield. Such reduction in growth of top and roots is considered to result from reductions in the whole root system caused by inhibiting formation and growth of lateral roots as well as a reduction of feeder roots (Yamashita 2003). Loss in global yield by various nematodes including M. incognita was about 10.2%, and monetary loss was about 2.6 billion US dollars (Sasser and Freckman 1987).

Nematicides can lessen quality and yield damage from nematodes (Johnson and Cairns 1971, Nielsen and Sasser 1959, Suzuki ). Treatment of a parasitic bacterium Pasteuria penetrans and preceding cropping of nematode resisting oat ‘Tachiibuki’ reduced density of nematodes (Tateishi , 2008). We can also use resistant cultivars. Southern root-knot nematodes can infect the roots of resistant sweetpotato (Komiyama , Kondo 1972), but this infection tends to induce necrosis that seems to be related to resistance of sweetpotato (Gentile , Giamalva , Komiyama ). Sasser and Freckman (1987) indicated 31% of nematologists could access nematode-tolerant or nematode-resistant seeds or rootstocks based on worldwide surveys. Recently released cultivars resistant or tolerant to this species include ‘Evangelin’, ‘Covington’, ‘Beniharuka’, ‘Konamizuki’, ‘Hoshikogane’, and ‘Aikomachi’ (Kai , Katayama , Kuranouchi , La Bonte , Ohara-Takada , Yencho ). Resistant cultivars are effective for management of nematodes: however, Nishizawa (1974) found a pathotype of M. incognita that could break through resistant sweetpotatoes, and Tateishi (2003) described increasing density of nematodes after alternating resistant cultivar with a susceptible cultivar. These results may be because of invasion by new races. Suzuki indicated that southern root-knot nematodes decreased yield even in resistant sweetpotato cultivars ‘J-red’ and ‘Kyushu No. 139’ under high nematode density conditions. A combination of nematicides, resistant cultivars, crop rotation, and other methods of cultural control is needed for long-term and effective control of nematodes.

Although the sweetpotato has a complex genetic nature (an outcrossing hexaploid species with many chromosomes, 2n = 6× = 90), several genetic analyses have been reported, including the development of DNA markers associated with southern root-knot nematode-resistant genes. The observed distribution models of F1 populations (bimodal, binominal, or biased), speculated inheritance models of resistant genes (simplex or duplex), number of DNA markers, and whether resistance was controlled qualitatively or quantitatively varied with each analysis (Table 1). These results suggest that sweetpotatoes have a few dominant genes with a strong resistance effect and several genes with weak resistance effects. In tomatoes, resistance to root-knot nematode was controlled by the single dominant gene Mi (Gilbert 1958), which was isolated by Milligan . Isolation of nematode-resistant genes in sweetpotatoes can promote our understanding of resistance mechanisms.

Table 1

Genetic analysis and DNA markers associated with southern root-knot nematode

Type of F1 progenies	No. of progenies	Parentsa	Distribution model	Segregation ratio (resistance: susceptible)	Inheritance modelb	Resistant control	Type of marker	No. of markers	Reference
full-sibs	71	Regal (r) × Vardaman (s)	bimodal (logaritm)	4:1	duplex	qualitative	RAPD	1	Ukoskit et al. (1997)
half-sibs	48	Beauregard (s), Excel, L94–96 (r), L89–110, L86-33, L96–117 (Open polination)	bimodal (logaritm)	–	–	qualitative	AFLP	5	Mcharo et al. (2005)
full-sibs	55	Beauregard (s) × Wagabolige Kyukei No. 63 × Jonathan W218 Jonathan W154 × Wagabolige CN1732-4 × Jonathan W218 Tanzania × Wagabolige Tanzania (Open polination)	binominal (logaritm)	–	–	quantitative	AFLP	4	Mcharo et al. (2005)
full-sibs	240	Tanzania (r) × Beauregard (s)	biased	–	–	quantitative	AFLP	9	Cervantes-Flores et al. (2008)
full-sibs	86	Hi-Starch (r) × Koganesengan (s)	biased	1:1	simplex	qualitative	SCAR	2	Nakayama et al. (2012)

(r): resistant, (s): susceptible. No symbol: no coment about resitance or susceptibility was discribed by authors.

duplex: RRrrrr in resistant parent and rrrrrr in susceptible parent, simplex: Rrrrrr in resistant parent and rrrrrr in susceptible parent.

Weevils

Two genera of weevils, Cylas and Euscepes, are the most serious weevil pests affecting sweetpotatoes (Ames , Jansson and Raman 1991, Smith ). The weevil Cylas formicarius (Fabricius) and the West Indian weevil Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaure) are major sweetpotato pests. These two species have caused enormous economic damage to farmers cultivating the sweetpotato in countries in Central and South America, the South Pacific Islands (Sherman and Tamashiro 1954). In Japan, weevils damage sweetpotatoes in the Nansei Islands, including the Okinawa prefecture, where weevils are an obstacle to agricultural advancement in the region. The Plant Protection Law prohibits shipping sweetpotatoes from infested to un-infested regions in Japan. In the worst cases, weevils can completely eliminate storage root production (Talekar 1988). Insecticides are the primary method of control, although they are not always effective because of the weevil’s cryptic behavior (Jansson 1992). A weevil eating a storage root may cause relatively little physical damage to the storage root, mostly creating cosmetic problems on the surface or in the flesh. However, infestation by one weevil induces the production of secondary metabolites, ipomeamarones, which decrease the storage root value. The ipomeamarones belong to the sesquiterpene class, cause the storage root to taste bitter and astringent, and are toxic to animals (Uritani 2001). Therefore, storage roots damaged by weevils cannot be used for any purpose (de Menezes 2002, Jansson and Raman 1991).

There are two possible solutions: breeding an ipomeamarone-free cultivar or breeding a weevil-resistant cultivar. There is currently no hope of achieving the first option, but the second option is practical. Natural resistance to pests is present in almost all crops (Collins ), although resistance to E. postfasciatus is less documented than resistance to Cylas spp. (Raman and Alleyne 1991), potentially because of the wider distribution of Cylas spp. (Wolfe 1991). Polyphenol substances found in some sweetpotato cultivars play an important role in resistance to Cylas weevils (Muyinza ). These substances may also provide resistance to E. postfasciatus. In areas where both species of weevils occur sympatrically, the damage to sweetpotatoes should be evaluated separately for E. postfasciatus and Cylas formicarius (F.) or its other congeneric species. On the Nansei Islands, located in southern Japan, sweetpotatoes are seriously damaged by both species, and the weevil population is highest from May to October (Yasuda 1993, 1997). Their damage to the sweetpotato stems varies with the time of planting of the crop, becoming apparent 30–60 days after planting from April to September, but 90–120 days after planting during the cooler months. The time lag between planting and the first appearance of damage relates to the invasion of weevils and their population increase in the field (Yasuda 1997). The resistance of sweetpotato to weevils should be examined in terms of the adult’s preference for ovipositing on specific cultivars, which may relate to the suitability of the storage roots for larval growth (Wiklund 1975). Even if adults prefer a given cultivar for food and oviposition, the pest cannot increase rapidly unless the quality of the storage root also provides for larval development. Sweetpotato resistance to weevils has been reported in the laboratory and field (e.g., Blank , Bottega , França and Ritschel 2002, Okada , 2015, Silva and Ritschel 2001, Wanderley ). However, few studies have considered the preference of weevil adults for certain cultivars and the suitability of the preferred cultivars for the juvenile development.

Early research focused on transformation with proteins that decrease the digestibility of sweetpotatoes for insects. Newell transformed sweetpotato with a cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) trypsin inhibitor and the mannose binding snowdrop lectin. Cipriani , 2001) transformed sweetpotatoes with a soybean (Glycine max) Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor and a rice (Oryza sativa) cysteine protease inhibitor. Non-choice feeding tests with the E. postfasciatus in a screenhouse bioassay (Zhang ) revealed a moderate increase in weevil resistance in two transgenic events (Newell ). More recently, toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) were tested against Cylas spp. Diet incorporation tests measured toxicity of eight Bt proteins, chosen based on prior evidence of toxicity (Maingi ) or anti-Coleopteran activity. All Bt proteins tested were toxic to both species at <1 ppm, with two proteins consistently more toxic than the others (Moar ).

Evaluation of resistance to diseases and nematodes in sweetpotato breeding

Stem rot, soil rot, black rot, southern root-knot nematode and coffee root-lesion nematode are especially important for their impact on sweetpotatoes. We evaluated the resistance to these diseases and pests in our breeding program in NARO, and we have outlined our evaluation recommendations below.

Stem rot (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. batatas)

Stem rot of sweetpotato is caused by the soil-borne pathogenic fungi, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Batatas. The disease causes fibrous root rot and decreasing crop yield. Sterilization of vines before transplanting and soil sterilization are effective for prevention of the disease. The difference of resistance to this disease is obvious among cultivars.

Bud-cell suspension cultures of F. oxysporum provide a source for inoculation (Ogawa ). Optimal density of the bud cell is 1 × 107 spores/ml. Cut sprouts of sweetpotato cultivars and lines are dipped into the pathogen suspension just before planting in early June. To raise temperature, the rows in the experimental field should be covered with transparent mulch film. The investigation continues through late July when ‘Benikomachi’ is highly diseased. The invasion of F. oxysporum, i.e., the internal browning of vines, is checked to indicate parasitism by stem rot disease using an index ranging from 1 (healthy) to 6 (dead). The resistance of experimental cultivars and lines of sweetpotato to stem rot is determined by referring the index of ‘Benikomachi’ (susceptible), ‘Beniazuma’ (intermediate) and ‘Tamayutaka’ (slightly resistant).

Soil rot (Streptomyces ipomoeae)

The resistance of sweetpotato cultivars and lines to soil rot should be evaluated in an infested field. Lime fertilizer increases soil pH and promotes infection. To raise the ground temperature, the rows in the experimental field should be covered with transparent mulch film. The cut sprouts of sweetpotato cultivars and lines are planted on early June. The investigation is carried out in early August when ‘Kokei No. 14’ is highly diseased. Roots are harvested and symptoms are observed. The internal browning of vines, lesions by S. ipomoeae, and delayed growth indicate parasitism using an index ranging from 1 (healthy) to 6 (dead). The resistance of experimental cultivars and lines of sweetpotato to soil rot is determined by referring the index of ‘Kokei No. 14’ (susceptible), ‘Benikomachi’ (slightly susceptible), ‘Beniazuma’ (slightly resistant), and ‘90 IDN-47’ (resistant) (Kuranouchi ).

Black rot (Ceratocystis fimbriata)

Black rot of sweetpotato is caused by the soil-borne pathogenic fungi, Ceratocystis fimbriata. The disease causes necrotic lesions on storage roots, and decreases quality. Sterilization of storage roots before burying in nursery bed, soil sterilization and crop rotation are effective for prevention of the disease. The difference of resistance to this disease is obvious among cultivars.

The slant medium is used to cultivate Ceratocystis fimbriata mycelium. Spores are collected and suspended in distilled water. The cut end of sweetpotato sprouts are dipped into the pathogen suspension. Inoculated cut sprouts are incubated at 30°C with high humidity for 4–5 days. Grayish mycelia are formed at their cut ends after incubation. The cut sprouts are planted in the experimental field in mid-July, and the investigation is carried out through mid-September. The internal browning of vines and lesions on the surface of tuberous roots by C. fimbriata are checked to indicate parasitism by black rot using an index ranging from 1 (healthy) to 5 (severe). The resistance of experimental cultivars and lines of sweetpotato to black rot is determined using the index of ‘Koganesengan’ (susceptible), ‘Harukogane’ (slightly susceptible), ‘Beniazuma’ (intermediate) and ‘Tamayutaka’ (resistant). Rapid methods for evaluating the resistance of sweetpotato cultivars and lines to black rot have been reported (Mori ).

Southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita)

The resistance of sweetpotato cultivars and lines to southern root-knot nematode has been evaluated in infested fields. ‘Kanto No. 14’, a susceptible line, was cultivated to increase nematodes the previous year. The cut sprouts of sweetpotato cultivars and lines were planted in an experimental field mid-May, with investigation mid-July (Kuranouchi ). The fibrous root systems are individually harvested and carefully washed. They are dyed with 0.05% Phloxine B water solution for 30 minutes and are checked for egg-mass formation. Parasitism of M. incognita is indicated with an index ranging from 1 (healthy) to 5 (severe). The resistance of experimental cultivars and lines of sweetpotato to southern root-knot nematodes is determined by referring the index of ‘Kanto No. 14’ (susceptible), ‘Kokei No. 14’ (slightly susceptible), ‘Beniazuma’ (intermediate) and ‘J Red’ (resistant). Differences in parasitism among the races of M. incognita have been studied (Sano and Iwahori 2005). Breeding a multi-race-resistant line is an important goal. Seedling selection is effective on the rapid breeding of resistant lines (Kuranouchi ).

Coffee root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus coffeae)

Coffee root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus coffeae) infects fibrous roots of sweetpotato, and this species is one of primary sweetpotato pests in southern part of Japan. Coffee root-lesion nematodes infect the fibrous roots and make dark brownish spots on the roots. The resistance of sweetpotato cultivars and lines to coffee root-lesion nematode has been evaluated in nematodes infested fields. ‘Norin No. 2’, a susceptible cultivar, was cultivated in the fields to increase population density of nematodes in the previous year of field trials. The resistance of experimental cultivars and lines of sweetpotato to this nematode is determined by referring the degree of the parasitism on ‘Norin No. 2’ (susceptible), ‘Koganesengan’ (slightly susceptible) and ‘Shiroyutaka’ (slightly resistant). A cultivar ‘Elegant Summer’ shows low reproduction rate of this nematode (Uesugi ).

Conclusions

This paper summarizes our current understanding of geographic distribution, symptomatology, pathogen biology, and management of the major sweetpotato pests. Pests caused by fungi, bacteria, virus, and some insects can occur at any point in the production cycle, and their prevalence is greatly influenced by the crop system and geographic location. Further research should investigate pests that occur under tropical production systems. Weevils are especially difficult to control, even with insecticides, because they feed inside the roots. Use of weevil-resistant sweetpotato cultivars appears to be a practical economical method of control. The apparent inconsistency in resistance among cultivars from season to season or location to location complicates the development of weevil-resistant sweetpotato varieties.

Further work should include in vitro screening, identifying sources of resistance in related species, and interspecific transfer, antixenosis, and antibiosis. Further international efforts should concentrate on germplasm exchange, exchange of advanced breeding lines, and advanced information management, apart from the combination of new and emerging technologies with conventional breeding techniques.