| Literature DB >> 28465481 |
Hiroaki Nagata1,2, Ken-Ichi Kozaki1,3,4, Tomoki Muramatsu1, Hidekazu Hiramoto1,2, Kousuke Tanimoto5, Naoto Fujiwara1,6, Seiya Imoto7, Daisuke Ichikawa2, Eigo Otsuji2, Satoru Miyano7, Tatsuyuki Kawano6, Johji Inazawa1,3,8.
Abstract
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is well-known to be an early event associated with poor prognosis in patients with ESCC. Recently, tumor-specific aberrant DNA methylation of CpG islands around the promoter regions of tumor-related genes has been investigated as a possible biomarker for use in early diagnosis and prediction of prognosis. However, there are few DNA methylation markers able to predict the presence of LNM in ESCC. To identify DNA methylation markers associated with LNM of ESCC, we performed a genome-wide screening of DNA methylation status in a discovery cohort of 67 primary ESCC tissues and their paired normal esophageal tissues using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. In this screening, we focused on differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that were associated with LNM of ESCC, as prime candidates for DNA methylation markers. We extracted three genes, HOXB2, SLC15A3, and SEPT9, as candidates predicting LNM of ESCC, using pyrosequencing and several statistical analyses in the discovery cohort. We confirmed that HOXB2 and SEPT9 were highly methylated in LNM-positive tumors in 59 ESCC validation samples. These results suggested that HOXB2 and SEPT9 may be useful epigenetic biomarkers for the prediction of the presence of LNM in ESCC.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; lymph node metastasis; predictive biomarker; pyrosequencing analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28465481 PMCID: PMC5514945 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Schematic strategy for the identification of useful epigenetic biomarkers for the prediction of the presence of LNM in primary ESCC cases
Figure 2DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing
(A) Pyrosequencing was performed to measure the methylation level of candidate genes to validate the Illumina HumanMethylation450 assay results. Candidate CpGs in HOXB2 are shown. Average methylation was higher in N3 tumor tissue samples (upper: 47%) than in N0 tumor tissue samples (lower: 2%). (B) Correlation diagram of pyrosequencing data of each CpG site of the candidate genes. Matrix shows the correlation coefficient (r: -1 [blue] to 1 [red]) among all CpG sites within the sequencing areas of the pyrosequencing analysis. Each candidate gene contained multiple CpG sites. Rows and columns represent each CpG site of each candidate gene. The numbers in parentheses after gene name represent the number of CpG site which were within the sequence analyzed.
Figure 3Analysis of DNA methylation of each candidate gene in the 67 ESCC patients of the discovery cohort
Differences in methylation status of each candidate gene between paired normal and tumor tissues in N3 samples (A) and N0 samples (B). Paired t-test was used for comparison of pyrosequencing results for each candidate.
Correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and methylation status of selected genes in primary ESCC cases
| N | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | ||||||||
| Total number | 67 | 42 | 24 | * total 66 | 43 | 24 | 32 | 35 | 33 | 34 | 25 | 42 | |||||
| Age | |||||||||||||||||
| Average 65.6 | <65 | 28 | 18 | 10 | 17 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 18 | |||||
| (46-83) | ≧65 | 39 | 24 | 14 | 26 | 13 | 19 | 20 | 18 | 21 | 15 | 24 | |||||
| Gender | |||||||||||||||||
| Male | 62 | 38 | 23 | 39 | 23 | 28 | 34 | 31 | 31 | 23 | 39 | ||||||
| Female | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| Histological grading | |||||||||||||||||
| GoodModerate | 53 | 32 | 20 | 35 | 18 | 25 | 28 | 26 | 27 | 18 | 35 | ||||||
| Poor | 14 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||||||
| TNM classification | |||||||||||||||||
| pT category | |||||||||||||||||
| T1+2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 | ||||||
| T3+4 | 60 | 39 | 20 | 39 | 21 | 28 | 32 | 28 | 32 | 25 | 35 | ||||||
| pN category | |||||||||||||||||
| N- | 15 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 6 | ||||||
| N+ | 52 | 28 | 24 | 29 | 23 | 20 | 32 | 21 | 31 | 16 | 36 | ||||||
| pM category | |||||||||||||||||
| M0 | 50 | 32 | 17 | 34 | 16 | 23 | 27 | 28 | 22 | 22 | 28 | ||||||
| M1 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 14 | ||||||
| pStage | |||||||||||||||||
| I+II | 15 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 8 | ||||||
| III+IV | 52 | 30 | 22 | 29 | 23 | 21 | 31 | 21 | 31 | 18 | 34 | ||||||
Logistic regression analysis and stepwise selection of candidate genes
| Parameter | Intercept | df | Wald | Significance probability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | -1.506 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | |
| * | 0.097 | 1.000 | 2.548 | 0.110 | |
| 0.000 | 1.000 | 1.754 | 0.185 | ||
| * | 0.085 | 1.000 | 2.450 | 0.118 | |
| 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.189 | 0.664 | ||
| 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.075 | 0.785 | ||
| 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.107 | 0.744 | ||
| 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.085 | 0.771 | ||
| 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.021 | 0.883 | ||
| * | 0.028 | 1.000 | 1.497 | 0.221 | |
| 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.765 | 0.382 |
*selected candidate gene by logistic regression analysis (stepwise method) df: degree of freedom.
Figure 4Analysis of DNA methylation of HOXB2, SLC15A3, and SEPT9 in the 59 ESCC patients of the independent set of ESCC cases
Validation of the methylation status of three candidate genes, HOXB2, SLC15A3, and SEPT9, by pyrosequencing in the independent set of ESCC cases. The methylation status in the LNM-negative and -positive groups were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. The horizontal lines represent the means of the whole samples for each genes.
| n | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | ||||||||
| Total number | 67 | 21 | 46 | 40 | 27 | 10 | 57 | 31 | 36 | 47 | 20 | ||||||
| Age | |||||||||||||||||
| Average 65.6 | <65 | 28 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 12 | 5 | 23 | 13 | 15 | 23 | 5 | |||||
| (46-83) | ≧65 | 39 | 11 | 28 | 24 | 15 | 5 | 34 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 15 | |||||
| Gender | |||||||||||||||||
| Male | 62 | 19 | 43 | 38 | 24 | 9 | 53 | 29 | 33 | 43 | 19 | ||||||
| Female | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | ||||||
| Histological grading | |||||||||||||||||
| GoodModerate | 53 | 17 | 36 | 32 | 21 | 9 | 44 | 24 | 29 | 37 | 16 | ||||||
| Poor | 14 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 4 | ||||||
| TNM classification | |||||||||||||||||
| pT category | |||||||||||||||||
| T1+2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | ||||||
| T3+4 | 60 | 18 | 42 | 36 | 24 | 9 | 51 | 28 | 32 | 43 | 17 | ||||||
| pN category | |||||||||||||||||
| N- | 15 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 0 | ||||||
| N+ | 52 | 12 | 40 | 27 | 25 | 4 | 48 | 19 | 33 | 32 | 20 | ||||||
| pM category | |||||||||||||||||
| M0 | 50 | 17 | 33 | 32 | 18 | 9 | 41 | 27 | 23 | 36 | 14 | ||||||
| M1 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 16 | 11 | 6 | 11 | 6 | ||||||
| pStage | |||||||||||||||||
| I+II | 15 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 14 | 1 | ||||||
| III+IV | 52 | 13 | 39 | 28 | 24 | 3 | 49 | 21 | 31 | 33 | 19 | ||||||
p-values are from χ2 or Fisher's exact test as appropriate, and were statistically significant when < 0.05 (two-sided).