Ferdinand K Hui1, Amgad El Mekabaty1, Jacky Schultz2, Kelvin Hong1, Karen Horton1, Victor Urrutia3, Imama Naqvi4, Shawn Brast5, John K Lynch4, Zurab Nadareishvili4,6. 1. Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. President's Office, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 4. Section on Stroke Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 5. Johns Hopkins Lifeline, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 6. Suburban Hospital NIH Stroke Center and Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is increasingly recognized that time is one of the key determinants in acute stroke outcome when interventional stroke therapy is applied. With increasing device efficacy and understanding of imaging triage options, reducing pre-treatment time loss may be a critical component of improving interventional stroke outcomes for the population at large. Time sensitive procedures such as organ harvest have transported physicians to the patient site to improve time to procedure. Applying this same principle to interventional stroke management may be a valid paradigm. METHODS: Previous logistical deliberation with hospital and Medevac companies was carried out to provide the rationale and funding for helicopter transfer of a neurointerventionalist to an in-network hospital with an on-site angiographic suite. An appropriate patient with large vessel occlusion and an NIH Stroke Scale score >8 was identified. MRI was performed, then the Medevac transport system was activated and the intervention was carried out. Times were collected during the case and assessed for time efficiency. RESULTS: The proof of concept case was identified and Medevac was consulted at 12:13 after verifying that no in-house emergencies would prevent physician departure. Weather clearance was obtained and stroke intervention confirmed as a go at 12:24. Groin puncture occurred at 13:07 and the intervention was completed at 13:41. The total time from decision-to-treat to groin puncture was 43 min and groin closure was completed at 77 min from decision-to-treat. CONCLUSIONS: This proof of concept case is presented for logistical, financial and use-case analysis. As it is a first case, times can likely be improved. We assert that this model may be another option in the spoke-and-hub design of stroke systems of care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is increasingly recognized that time is one of the key determinants in acute stroke outcome when interventional stroke therapy is applied. With increasing device efficacy and understanding of imaging triage options, reducing pre-treatment time loss may be a critical component of improving interventional stroke outcomes for the population at large. Time sensitive procedures such as organ harvest have transported physicians to the patient site to improve time to procedure. Applying this same principle to interventional stroke management may be a valid paradigm. METHODS: Previous logistical deliberation with hospital and Medevac companies was carried out to provide the rationale and funding for helicopter transfer of a neurointerventionalist to an in-network hospital with an on-site angiographic suite. An appropriate patient with large vessel occlusion and an NIH Stroke Scale score >8 was identified. MRI was performed, then the Medevac transport system was activated and the intervention was carried out. Times were collected during the case and assessed for time efficiency. RESULTS: The proof of concept case was identified and Medevac was consulted at 12:13 after verifying that no in-house emergencies would prevent physician departure. Weather clearance was obtained and stroke intervention confirmed as a go at 12:24. Groin puncture occurred at 13:07 and the intervention was completed at 13:41. The total time from decision-to-treat to groin puncture was 43 min and groin closure was completed at 77 min from decision-to-treat. CONCLUSIONS: This proof of concept case is presented for logistical, financial and use-case analysis. As it is a first case, times can likely be improved. We assert that this model may be another option in the spoke-and-hub design of stroke systems of care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Gordian J Hubert; Nikolai D Hubert; Christian Maegerlein; Frank Kraus; Hanni Wiestler; Peter Müller-Barna; Wolfgang Gerdsmeier-Petz; Christoph Degenhart; Katharina Hohenbichler; Dennis Dietrich; Thomas Witton-Davies; Angelika Regler; Laura Paternoster; Miriam Leitner; Florian Zeman; Michael Koller; Ralf A Linker; Philip M Bath; Heinrich J Audebert; Roman L Haberl Journal: JAMA Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Shreyansh Shah; Ying Xian; Shubin Sheng; Kori S Zachrison; Jeffrey L Saver; Kevin N Sheth; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael T Froehler; Jeffrey L Saver; Osama O Zaidat; Reza Jahan; Mohammad Ali Aziz-Sultan; Richard P Klucznik; Diogo C Haussen; Frank R Hellinger; Dileep R Yavagal; Tom L Yao; David S Liebeskind; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Rishi Gupta; Ameer E Hassan; Coleman O Martin; Hormozd Bozorgchami; Ritesh Kaushal; Raul G Nogueira; Ravi H Gandhi; Eric C Peterson; Shervin R Dashti; Curtis A Given; Brijesh P Mehta; Vivek Deshmukh; Sidney Starkman; Italo Linfante; Scott H McPherson; Peter Kvamme; Thomas J Grobelny; Muhammad S Hussain; Ike Thacker; Nirav Vora; Peng Roc Chen; Stephen J Monteith; Robert D Ecker; Clemens M Schirmer; Eric Sauvageau; Alex Abou-Chebl; Colin P Derdeyn; Lucian Maidan; Aamir Badruddin; Adnan H Siddiqui; Travis M Dumont; Abdulnasser Alhajeri; M Asif Taqi; Khaled Asi; Jeffrey Carpenter; Alan Boulos; Gaurav Jindal; Ajit S Puri; Rohan Chitale; Eric M Deshaies; David H Robinson; David F Kallmes; Blaise W Baxter; Mouhammad A Jumaa; Peter Sunenshine; Aniel Majjhoo; Joey D English; Shuichi Suzuki; Richard D Fessler; Josser E Delgado Almandoz; Jerry C Martin; Nils H Mueller-Kronast Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Fabricio O Lima; Francisco José Arruda Mont'Alverne; Diego Bandeira; Raul G Nogueira Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Mohammad El-Ghanem; Francisco E Gomez; Prateeka Koul; Rolla Nuoman; Justin G Santarelli; Krishna Amuluru; Chirag D Gandhi; Eric R Cohen; Philip Meyers; Fawaz Al-Mufti Journal: Interv Neurol Date: 2018-12-13