Literature DB >> 28465370

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Ramucirumab in Chinese Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Junning Cao1, Dongmei Ji1, Zhiyu Chen1, Weina Shen1, Jin Wang2, Baoyue Li2, Haidong Chi2, Amanda Long3, Ling Gao4, Jin Li5.   

Abstract

LESSONS LEARNED: Ramucirumab was well tolerated in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors, and adverse events were manageable in this study.Pharmacokinetics characteristics in Chinese patients were similar to those in other populations. Immunogenicity was not detected.No efficacy conclusion could be drawn, and further randomized studies are warranted.
BACKGROUND: This single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation, phase I study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ramucirumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors that were resistant to standard therapy or no standard therapy was available.
METHODS: Dose escalation was a 3 + 3 design, with expansion in Cohorts 2 and 3 for PK. Ramucirumab was given intravenously at three different dosages: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, and 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Safety analyses included all patients. PK, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity were also assessed.
RESULTS: Among 28 patients treated, 2 experienced dose-limiting toxicity, possibly related to ramucirumab. No maximum tolerated dose was determined. All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Grade ≥3 adverse event was reported for 53.6% (n = 15) of patients. PK analyses indicated that ramucirumab had low clearance, small volume of distribution, and long half-life in Chinese patients, as in other populations. Immunogenicity was not detected. No patient had complete/partial response, and 64.3% (n = 18) had stable disease with a median duration of 5.55 months (95% confidence interval: 3.38-7.13 months).
CONCLUSION: Ramucirumab appeared to be well tolerated in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. PK characteristics in Chinese patients were similar to those in other populations. © AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28465370      PMCID: PMC5469595          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


Discussion

Ramucirumab is a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 [1], [2], [3]. Its clinical benefit has been demonstrated in several phase III studies in patients with gastric cancer, non‐small cell lung cancer, or colorectal cancer [4], [5], [6], [7]. However, data among Chinese population were minimal. In this study, eligible patients were enrolled sequentially into three cohorts and received ramucirumab intravenously at three different dosage levels, respectively. Dose selection and escalation were based on phase I trial results conducted globally [8], [9]. Two patients experienced dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT), possibly related to ramucirumab: 1 in Cohort 1 (grade 3 proteinuria), 1 in Cohort 2 (grade 3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased). No DLT was observed in Cohort 3 at the highest dose. All 28 treated patients experienced at least 1 treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE). Study drug‐related adverse events (AEs) that occurred in ≥20% of total patients included fatigue, hypertension, increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), proteinuria, increased ALT, decreased appetite, sinus bradycardia, headache, decreased platelet count, mouth hemorrhage, and epistaxis. Related grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 35.7% (n = 10) of patients, and related grade ≥3 hypertension (25%, n = 7) was the only event ≥5%. Those grade ≥3 hypertension events were all grade 3. No hypertension led to treatment discontinuation or study drug dose delay/modification. A total of four serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported, and one SAE (upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage) that occurred in a patient in Cohort 2 was considered to be related to study drug. Two patients died: one within 30 days of last dose due to study disease (fibrosarcoma) and one on treatment due to SAE (impaired gastric emptying) not rela ted to ramucirumab.

Adverse Events

DLT: Grade 3 proteinuria (Cohort 1), grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increased (Cohort 2). SAE: Grade 3 fatigue (Cohort 1), grade 3 upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (Cohort 2) and grade 4 blood bilirubin increased (Cohort 2), grade 4 impaired gastric emptying (Cohort 3). The only drug‐related SAE was upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in Cohort 2. Death: Impaired gastric emptying (Cohort 3), same patient as in SAE. Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; DLT, dose‐limiting toxicity; SAE, serious adverse event; TEAE, treatment‐emergent adverse event. The geometric mean values reported for single‐ and multiple‐dose noncompartmental analysis (NCA)‐derived PK parameters such as apparent terminal elimination half‐life (6–10 days), total body clearance (13 to 19 mL/h), and volume of distribution at steady state (3–4 L) were consistent with those expected for an IgG‐type monoclonal antibody and previously reported for ramucirumab [10-13]. Immunogenicity as anti‐ramucirumab antibody was not detected in any of the patients. Preliminary antitumor activity was demonstrated. No patient had complete/partial response; 64.3% (n = 18) had stable disease with a median duration of 5.55 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.38–7.13 months). The median time to disease progression was 3.38 months (95% CI: 1.41–5.55 months). However, because of limited sample size and single‐arm design, no efficacy conclusion can be drawn, and further randomized studies are warranted. In conclusion, ramucirumab was well tolerated in Chinese patients. The safety profile, PK, and immunogenicity results observed are consistent with previous studies of ramucirumab. This supports further development of ramucirumab in Chinese cancer patients and could provide evidence to extrapolate global data to the Chinese population.

Trial Information

Advanced cancer/solid tumor only Metastatic/advanced 1 prior regimen Phase I Dose‐escalation Safety Tolerability Pharmacokinetics Efficacy Immunogenicity Drug Tolerable, Hints of Efficacy

Drug Information

Ramucirumab Cyramza Eli Lilly and Company Antibody VEGFR Milligrams (mg) per kilogram (kg) IV Cohort 1: 6 mg/kg/2w Cohort 2: 10 mg/kg/3w Cohort 3: 8 mg/kg/2w

Patient Characteristics

14 14 Stage III: 6; Stage IV: 22 Median (range): 57.0 (36.8–68.2) Median (range): not collected 0 — 3 1 — 25 2 — 3 — unknown — Breast cancer: 6 Gastric cancer: 6 Colorectal cancer: 6 Head and neck cancer: 4 Other cancers: 6

Primary Assessment Method

40 28 28 28 n = 0 (0%) n = 0 (0%) n = 18 (64.3%) n = 9 (32.1%) n = 1 (3.6%) 3.38 months, CI: 1.14–5.55 Treatment‐emergent adverse events reported in ≥20% patients. Abbreviations: NA, no adverse event; NC, no change from baseline.

Serious Adverse Events

Treatment‐emergent adverse events reported in ≥ 20% patients.

Dose‐Limiting Toxicities

Assessment, Analysis, and Discussion

Study completed Drug Tolerable, Hints of Efficacy Numerous evidence suggested that the interaction of vascular endothelial growth factor with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 (VEGFR‐2) plays an important role in tumor angiogenesis [1], [2]. Ramucirumab is a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the extracellular domain of VEGFR‐2 with high affinity, inhibiting certain biological processes involved in tumor angiogenesis [3]. The safety and efficacy of ramucirumab have been demonstrated in four global, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized phase III trials: REGARD, RAINBOW, REVEL, and RAISE [4], [5], [6], [7]. Therefore, ramucirumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and in many other countries for the treatment of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, non‐small cell lung cancer, and colorectal cancer. We designed this single‐arm, nonrandomized, open‐label, dose‐escalation, phase I study in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Based on completed global phase I trial results [8], [9], ramucirumab was given intravenously at three dosage levels in three cohorts: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, and 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Dose escalation was based on a 3 + 3 design, with expansion in Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 for pharmacokinetics (PK) data if no maximum tolerated dose was determined after the first three to six patients. The primary objective of this study was to establish the safety profile and PK in Chinese patients. The secondary objectives included assessments of immunogenicity and antitumor activity. A total of 28 patients were treated with ramucirumab in this study, and all patients completed at least one cycle of treatment. The median duration of treatment was 6.0 weeks (1 cycle) in Cohort 1, 12.0 weeks (2 cycles) in Cohort 2, and 15.5 weeks (2.5 cycles) in Cohort 3. The relative dose intensities were approximately 100% and similar across the three cohorts. Male and female each comprised 50% of the patients, with a median age of 57 years old (range 37–68). One dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) happened in each of Cohort 1 (grade 3 proteinuria) and Cohort 2 (grade 3 ALT increased). No DLT was observed in Cohort 3 at the highest dose of this study. Therefore, no maximum tolerated dose was determined. All 28 treated patients experienced at least 1 TEAE; 27 (96.4%) of them were considered to be study drug‐related. The most frequent drug‐related AEs reported were fatigue (64.3%; no grade ≥3 event), hypertension (53.6%; 25% grade 3, no grade 4), increased AST (42.9%; no grade ≥3), proteinuria (42.9%; 3.6% grade 3, no grade 4), increased ALT (39.3%; 3.6% grade 3, no grade 4), decreased appetite (28.6%; no grade ≥3), sinus bradycardia (25.0%; no grade ≥3), headache (25.0%; no grade ≥3), decreased platelet count (21.4%; no grade ≥3), mouth hemorrhage (21.4%; no grade ≥3), and epistaxis (21.4%; no grade ≥3). Hypertension is a common adverse event of special interest, potentially associated with antiangiogenic agents or therapeutic antibodies. Hypertension that occurred in this study can be controlled with antihypertensive therapy and did not lead to treatment discontinuation or to dose delay or modification. Grade 3 elevated ALT was resolved within 2 weeks, and the study treatment was resumed without dose reduction. Grade 3 proteinuria was resolved within 2 weeks, and the study treatment was discontinued. Three patients experienced AEs that lead to discontinuation of study drug: grade 1 proteinuria, grade 3 upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and grade 4 impaired gastric emptying. A total of four SAEs were reported, and one SAE (upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage) was considered to be related to study drug. There were two deaths reported in this study: one within 30 days of last dose due to study disease (fibrosarcoma) and one on treatment due to SAE (impaired gastric emptying) not related to study drug. Ramucirumab exposures were higher for the 8‐ and 10‐mg/kg regimens as compared to the 6‐mg/kg regimen. Greater accumulation was generally observed following the 2‐week regimens as compared with the 3‐week regimen. The geometric mean values reported for single‐ and multiple‐dose NCA‐derived PK parameters such as apparentterminal elimination half‐life (6–10 days), total body clearance (13–19 mL/h), and volume of distribution at steady state (3–4 L) were consistent with those expected for an IgG‐type monoclonal antibody and previously reported for ramucirumab in other ethnic populations [10], [11], [12], [13]. Immunogenicity as anti‐ramucirumab antibody was not detected in any of the patients treated with ramucirumab. Ramucirumab was well tolerated in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors in this study. The safety profile observed in this study is consistent with previous studies of ramucirumab. The safety profile, PK, and immunogenicity results observed are consistent with those from previous studies of ramucirumab. Results of this study support the further development of ramucirumab in Chinese cancer patients. At the time of study completion, no patient showed complete/partial response. Eighteen patients had stable disease with a median duration of 5.55 months (95% CI: 3.38–7.13 months). The median time to disease progression was 3.38 months (95% CI: 1.41–5.55 months) in all 28 patients. RECIST were designed primarily for the evaluation of cytotoxic agents. Recent studies have shown a poor correlation between the objective response and survival benefit provided by antiangiogenic agents [14], [15]. As shown in REACH and REGARD studies, SD was often observed and resulted in the improvement of disease control rate (DCR) while ramucirumab was given as a single agent. In this study, preliminary antitumor activity was demonstrated. However, due to limited sample size and single‐arm design, no efficacy conclusion can be drawn from this phase I study and further randomized studies are warranted. Time to progressive disease of individual patients. Abbreviations: B, breast cancer; CR, colorectal cancer; G, gastric cancer; HN, head and neck cancer; ID, identification; O, other cancer. Duration of disease is time from date of histology/cytologic confirmation of advanced solid tumor to date of first dose. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; SD, standard deviation. MedDRA Version 17.1. Abbreviations: MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; TEAE, treatment‐emergent adverse event. MedDRA Version 17.1. TEAEs were graded by CTCAE. Abbreviations: MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; TEAE, treatment‐emergent adverse event. NPK = 5 for AUC (0‐∞), CL, and Vss. NPK = 7 for AUC (0‐∞), CL, and Vss. NPK = 11 for t1/2; NPK = 7 for AUC (0‐∞), CL, and Vss. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the concentration‐time curve; AUC(0‐∞), AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity; CL, total body clearance of drug calculated after intravenous administration; Cmax, maximum observed serum concentration; CV%, percent coefficient of variation; IV, intravenous; NPK, number of subjects used in pharmacokinetic analysis; t1/2, apparent terminal elimination half‐life; tmax, time of Cmax; Vss, volume of distribution at steady state. The dosing interval from Dose 2 to Dose 3 was approximately 5 weeks for 1 patient in Cohort 2. Summary data excluding this patient are as follows: Cmax,ss 224 (23); tmax,ss 2.00 (1.02–2.00); t1/2 12.4 (19); AUCτ,ss 1830 (14); CLss 13.3 (10); Vss 4.78 (10); RA,Cmax 1.27 (4); RA,AUC 1.42 (17). Individual data are presented. NPK = 4 for Vss; NPK = 5 for RA,Cmax and RA,AUC. NPK = 2 for Vss; individual values are presented. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the concentration‐time curve; AUCτ,ss, AUC over the dosing interval at steady state; CL, total body clearance of drug calculated after intravenous administration; CLss, clearance at steady state; Cmax, maximum observed serum concentration; Cmax,ss, maximum observed serum concentration at steady state; CV%, percent coefficient of variation; IV, intravenous; NC, not calculated; NPK, number of subjects used in pharmacokinetic analysis; RA,AUC, accumulation ratio based on AUC; RA,Cmax, accumulation ratio based on Cmax; t1/2, apparent terminal elimination half‐life; tmax,ss, time of Cmax,ss; Vss, volume of distribution at steady state.

DLT: Grade 3 proteinuria (Cohort 1), grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increased (Cohort 2).

SAE: Grade 3 fatigue (Cohort 1), grade 3 upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (Cohort 2) and grade 4 blood bilirubin increased (Cohort 2), grade 4 impaired gastric emptying (Cohort 3). The only drug‐related SAE was upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in Cohort 2.

Death: Impaired gastric emptying (Cohort 3), same patient as in SAE.

Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; DLT, dose‐limiting toxicity; SAE, serious adverse event; TEAE, treatment‐emergent adverse event.

Treatment‐emergent adverse events reported in ≥20% patients.

Abbreviations: NA, no adverse event; NC, no change from baseline.

Treatment‐emergent adverse events reported in ≥ 20% patients.

Table 1.

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics

Duration of disease is time from date of histology/cytologic confirmation of advanced solid tumor to date of first dose.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2.

Ramucirumab‐related treatment‐emergent adverse events occurring in at least 20% patients in any cohort

MedDRA Version 17.1.

Abbreviations: MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; TEAE, treatment‐emergent adverse event.

Table 3.

Ramucirumab‐related grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events

MedDRA Version 17.1.

TEAEs were graded by CTCAE.

Abbreviations: MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; TEAE, treatment‐emergent adverse event.

Table 4.

Summary of single dose ramucirumab pharmacokinetic parameters for Chinese patients with solid tumors following administration ramucirumab as an IV infusion over approximately 1 hour

NPK = 5 for AUC (0‐∞), CL, and Vss.

NPK = 7 for AUC (0‐∞), CL, and Vss.

NPK = 11 for t1/2; NPK = 7 for AUC (0‐∞), CL, and Vss.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the concentration‐time curve; AUC(0‐∞), AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity; CL, total body clearance of drug calculated after intravenous administration; Cmax, maximum observed serum concentration; CV%, percent coefficient of variation; IV, intravenous; NPK, number of subjects used in pharmacokinetic analysis; t1/2, apparent terminal elimination half‐life; tmax, time of Cmax; Vss, volume of distribution at steady state.

Table 5.

Summary of multiple dose ramucirumab pharmacokinetic parameters for Chinese patients with solid tumors following administration of ramucirumab as an IV infusion over approximately 1 hour every 2 or 3 weeks

The dosing interval from Dose 2 to Dose 3 was approximately 5 weeks for 1 patient in Cohort 2. Summary data excluding this patient are as follows: Cmax,ss 224 (23); tmax,ss 2.00 (1.02–2.00); t1/2 12.4 (19); AUCτ,ss 1830 (14); CLss 13.3 (10); Vss 4.78 (10); RA,Cmax 1.27 (4); RA,AUC 1.42 (17).

Individual data are presented.

NPK = 4 for Vss; NPK = 5 for RA,Cmax and RA,AUC.

NPK = 2 for Vss; individual values are presented.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the concentration‐time curve; AUCτ,ss, AUC over the dosing interval at steady state; CL, total body clearance of drug calculated after intravenous administration; CLss, clearance at steady state; Cmax, maximum observed serum concentration; Cmax,ss, maximum observed serum concentration at steady state; CV%, percent coefficient of variation; IV, intravenous; NC, not calculated; NPK, number of subjects used in pharmacokinetic analysis; RA,AUC, accumulation ratio based on AUC; RA,Cmax, accumulation ratio based on Cmax; t1/2, apparent terminal elimination half‐life; tmax,ss, time of Cmax,ss; Vss, volume of distribution at steady state.

  15 in total

1.  Ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that progressed during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Josep Tabernero; Takayuki Yoshino; Allen Lee Cohn; Radka Obermannova; Gyorgy Bodoky; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; David C Portnoy; Eric Van Cutsem; Axel Grothey; Jana Prausová; Pilar Garcia-Alfonso; Kentaro Yamazaki; Philip R Clingan; Sara Lonardi; Tae Won Kim; Lorinda Simms; Shao-Chun Chang; Federico Nasroulah
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Vascular endothelial growth factors and receptors: anti-angiogenic therapy in the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Sònia Tugues; Sina Koch; Laura Gualandi; Xiujuan Li; Lena Claesson-Welsh
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2011-05-06

3.  Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Second-line Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Takayuki Yoshino; Kentaro Yamazaki; Masahiro Gotoh; Federico Nasroulah; Ling Gao; Naoto Yoshizuka; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Charles S Fuchs; Jiri Tomasek; Cho Jae Yong; Filip Dumitru; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Chanchal Goswami; Howard Safran; Lucas Vieira Dos Santos; Giuseppe Aprile; David R Ferry; Bohuslav Melichar; Mustapha Tehfe; Eldar Topuzov; John Raymond Zalcberg; Ian Chau; William Campbell; Choondal Sivanandan; Joanna Pikiel; Minori Koshiji; Yanzhi Hsu; Astra M Liepa; Ling Gao; Jonathan D Schwartz; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Oscar Arrieta; Kumar Prabhash; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Tuncay Goksel; Keunchil Park; Vera Gorbunova; Ruben Dario Kowalyszyn; Joanna Pikiel; Grzegorz Czyzewicz; Sergey V Orlov; Conrad R Lewanski; Michael Thomas; Paolo Bidoli; Shaker Dakhil; Steven Gans; Joo-Hang Kim; Alexandru Grigorescu; Nina Karaseva; Martin Reck; Federico Cappuzzo; Ekaterine Alexandris; Andreas Sashegyi; Sergey Yurasov; Maurice Pérol
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Tailoring in vitro selection for a picomolar affinity human antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 for enhanced neutralizing activity.

Authors:  Dan Lu; Juqun Shen; Marie D Vil; Haifan Zhang; Xenia Jimenez; Peter Bohlen; Larry Witte; Zhenping Zhu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Ann-Lii Cheng; Yoon-Koo Kang; Zhendong Chen; Chao-Jung Tsao; Shukui Qin; Jun Suk Kim; Rongcheng Luo; Jifeng Feng; Shenglong Ye; Tsai-Sheng Yang; Jianming Xu; Yan Sun; Houjie Liang; Jiwei Liu; Jiejun Wang; Won Young Tak; Hongming Pan; Karin Burock; Jessie Zou; Dimitris Voliotis; Zhongzhen Guan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Hansjochen Wilke; Kei Muro; Eric Van Cutsem; Sang-Cheul Oh; György Bodoky; Yasuhiro Shimada; Shuichi Hironaka; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Oleg Lipatov; Tae-You Kim; David Cunningham; Philippe Rougier; Yoshito Komatsu; Jaffer Ajani; Michael Emig; Roberto Carlesi; David Ferry; Kumari Chandrawansa; Jonathan D Schwartz; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Phase I pharmacologic and biologic study of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2.

Authors:  Jennifer L Spratlin; Roger B Cohen; Matthew Eadens; Lia Gore; D Ross Camidge; Sami Diab; Stephen Leong; Cindy O'Bryant; Laura Q M Chow; Natalie J Serkova; Neal J Meropol; Nancy L Lewis; E Gabriela Chiorean; Floyd Fox; Hagop Youssoufian; Eric K Rowinsky; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ramucirumab: A Review in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yahiya Y Syed
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.