Literature DB >> 28465328

Private animal health and welfare standards in quality assurance programmes: a review and proposed framework for critical evaluation.

S J More1, A Hanlon1, J Marchewka2, L Boyle3.   

Abstract

In recent years, 'private standards' in animal health and welfare have become increasingly common, and are often incorporated into quality assurance (QA) programmes. Here, we present an overview of the use of private animal health and welfare standards in QA programmes, and propose a generic framework to facilitate critical programme review. Private standards are being developed in direct response to consumer demand for QA, and offer an opportunity for product differentiation and a means to drive consumer choice. Nonetheless, a range of concerns have been raised, relating to the credibility of these standards, their potential as a discriminatory barrier to trade, the multiplicity of private standards that have been developed, the lack of consumer input and compliance costs. There is a need for greater scrutiny of private standards and of associated QA programmes. We propose a framework to clarify the primary programme goal(s) and measureable outputs relevant to animal health and welfare, the primary programme beneficiaries and to determine whether the programme is effective, efficient and transparent. This paper provides a theoretical overview, noting that this framework could be used as a tool directly for programme evaluation, or as a tool to assist with programme development and review. British Veterinary Association.

Keywords:  Animal health and welfare; Private standards; Quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28465328     DOI: 10.1136/vr.104107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  7 in total

1.  Private Animal Welfare Standards-Opportunities and Risks.

Authors:  Frida Lundmark; Charlotte Berg; Helena Röcklinsberg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Challenges facing the veterinary profession in Ireland: 2. On-farm use of veterinary antimicrobials.

Authors:  Manuel Magalhães-Sant'Ana; Simon J More; David B Morton; Alison J Hanlon
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.146

Review 3.  Mastitis Control and Intramammary Antimicrobial Stewardship in Ireland: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Simon J More; Catherine McAloon; Pablo Silva Boloña; Luke O'Grady; Frank O'Sullivan; Michelle McGrath; Willie Buckley; Kevin Downing; Patrick Kelly; Eoin G Ryan; Finola McCoy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Assessing the Adoption of Recommended Standards, Novel Approaches, and Best Practices for Animal Health Surveillance by Decision Makers in Europe.

Authors:  Barbara Häsler; Maria Garza; Betty Bisdorff; Anaïs Léger; Saraya Tavornpanich; Marisa Peyre; Ann Lindberg; Gerdien van Schaik; Lis Alban; Katharina D C Stärk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-11-06

5.  Perspectives From the Science-Policy Interface in Animal Health and Welfare.

Authors:  Simon J More
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-11-08

6.  Welfare Assessment: Correspondence Analysis of Welfare Score and Hematological and Biochemical Profiles of Dairy Cows in Sardinia, Italy.

Authors:  Federica Loi; Giovannantonio Pilo; Giulia Franzoni; Rossana Re; Francesca Fusi; Luigi Bertocchi; Ugo Santucci; Valentina Lorenzi; Sandro Rolesu; Paola Nicolussi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Current Consumer Perceptions of Animal Welfare across Different Farming Sectors on the Island of Ireland.

Authors:  Sharon Sweeney; Áine Regan; Claire McKernan; Tony Benson; Alison Hanlon; Moira Dean
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.