Jerrilyn A Cambron1, Jennifer M Dexheimer2, Manuel Duarte3, Sally Freels4. 1. Department of Research, National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, IL. Electronic address: jcambron@nuhs.edu. 2. Department of Research, National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, IL. 3. Department of Clinical Practice, National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, IL. 4. School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of shoe orthotics with and without chiropractic treatment for chronic low back pain compared with no treatment. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:Integrative medicine teaching clinic at a university. PARTICIPANTS: Adult subjects (N=225) with symptomatic low back pain of ≥3 months were recruited from a volunteer sample. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized into 1 of 3 treatment groups (shoe orthotic, plus, and waitlist groups). The shoe orthotic group received custom-made shoe orthotics. The plus group received custom-made orthotics plus chiropractic manipulation, hot or cold packs, and manual soft tissue massage. The waitlist group received no care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were change in perceived back pain (numerical pain rating scale) and functional health status (Oswestry Disability Index) after 6 weeks of study participation. Outcomes were also assessed after 12 weeks and then after an additional 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: After 6 weeks, all 3 groups demonstrated significant within-group improvement in average back pain, but only the shoe orthotic and plus groups had significant within-group improvement in function. When compared with the waitlist group, the shoe orthotic group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in pain (P<.0001) and function (P=.0068). The addition of chiropractic to orthotics treatment demonstrated significantly greater improvements in function (P=.0278) when compared with orthotics alone, but no significant difference in pain (P=.3431). Group differences at 12 weeks and later were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of prescription shoe orthotics significantly improved back pain and dysfunction compared with no treatment. The addition of chiropractic care led to higher improvements in function.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of shoe orthotics with and without chiropractic treatment for chronic low back pain compared with no treatment. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Integrative medicine teaching clinic at a university. PARTICIPANTS: Adult subjects (N=225) with symptomatic low back pain of ≥3 months were recruited from a volunteer sample. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized into 1 of 3 treatment groups (shoe orthotic, plus, and waitlist groups). The shoe orthotic group received custom-made shoe orthotics. The plus group received custom-made orthotics plus chiropractic manipulation, hot or cold packs, and manual soft tissue massage. The waitlist group received no care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were change in perceived back pain (numerical pain rating scale) and functional health status (Oswestry Disability Index) after 6 weeks of study participation. Outcomes were also assessed after 12 weeks and then after an additional 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: After 6 weeks, all 3 groups demonstrated significant within-group improvement in average back pain, but only the shoe orthotic and plus groups had significant within-group improvement in function. When compared with the waitlist group, the shoe orthotic group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in pain (P<.0001) and function (P=.0068). The addition of chiropractic to orthotics treatment demonstrated significantly greater improvements in function (P=.0278) when compared with orthotics alone, but no significant difference in pain (P=.3431). Group differences at 12 weeks and later were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of prescription shoe orthotics significantly improved back pain and dysfunction compared with no treatment. The addition of chiropractic care led to higher improvements in function.
Authors: Carlos Gevers-Montoro; Kelvin J Murray; Beatriz Santamaría; Gema Dominguez-Vera; Luis Álvarez-Galovich; Dein Vindigni; Michael F Azari; Arantxa Ortega de Mues; Aurora Castro-Mendez Journal: J Chiropr Med Date: 2022-04-06