Literature DB >> 28465023

The impact of fever on corrected QT interval.

Doran Drew1, Adrian Baranchuk2, Wilma Hopman3, Robert J Brison4.   

Abstract

AIMS: We were interested in the impact of fever on the QT interval as information on this subject is limited.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single centre study over a two year period, ending December 31st, 2013. Participants were identified using an electronic chart review of emergency department records linked to an ECG data base. Study subjects were drawn from patients presenting with fever to an academic emergency department in Canada. Our study identified febrile (T>38.0°C) patients aged >18years presenting to our centre. Included participants must have had an ED based ECG at the time of presentation with fever and a comparison ECG performed within 30days and without fever. Actively paced patients were excluded. QT values were corrected using Bazett's, Fridericia's and The Framingham Formula. QT values for febrile and afebrile cohorts were compared using Related-Samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.
RESULTS: 181 patients satisfied our inclusion/exclusion criteria, 54.1% were female and mean age was 68.9years old. Mean duration between febrile and afebrile ECGs was 6.1days. The median corrected QT interval (QTc) was significantly shorter in patients during their febrile presentation, as compared to their afebrile presentation when correcting for QT using both Framingham [QTc=466.1ms (445.8-499.5) vs. 507.6 (476.0-539.0); p<0.001] and Fridericia's formula [QTc=388.7ms, (371.5-407.5) vs. 406.7ms, (386.1-434.4); p<0.001]. This difference was independent of gender.
CONCLUSION: We found fever to shorten the QTc independently of sex in a general emergency department population.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrocardiography; Electrophysiology; Fever; QT interval

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28465023     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  5 in total

1.  Conundrum of Clinical QTc Monitoring.

Authors:  Marek Malik
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 2.  Sources of QTc variability: Implications for effective ECG monitoring in clinical practice.

Authors:  Katerina Hnatkova; Marek Malik
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Pooled Multicenter Analysis of Cardiovascular Safety and Population Pharmacokinetic Properties of Piperaquine in African Patients with Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria.

Authors:  Thanaporn Wattanakul; Bernhards Ogutu; Abdunoor M Kabanywanyi; Kwaku-Poku Asante; Abraham Oduro; Alex Adjei; Ali Sie; Esperanca Sevene; Eusebio Macete; Guillaume Compaore; Innocent Valea; Isaac Osei; Markus Winterberg; Margaret Gyapong; Martin Adjuik; Salim Abdulla; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Nicholas J White; Nicholas P J Day; Halidou Tinto; Rita Baiden; Fred Binka; Joel Tarning
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Factors affecting the electrocardiographic QT interval in malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Authors:  Xin Hui S Chan; Yan Naung Win; Ilsa L Haeusler; Jireh Y Tan; Shanghavie Loganathan; Sompob Saralamba; Shu Kiat S Chan; Elizabeth A Ashley; Karen I Barnes; Rita Baiden; Peter U Bassi; Abdoulaye Djimde; Grant Dorsey; Stephan Duparc; Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn; Feiko O Ter Kuile; Marcus V G Lacerda; Amit Nasa; François H Nosten; Cyprian O Onyeji; Sasithon Pukrittayakamee; André M Siqueira; Joel Tarning; Walter R J Taylor; Giovanni Valentini; Michèle van Vugt; David Wesche; Nicholas P J Day; Christopher L-H Huang; Josep Brugada; Ric N Price; Nicholas J White
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability.

Authors:  Irena Andršová; Katerina Hnatkova; Martina Šišáková; Ondřej Toman; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.