Taylor J Ridley1, Will Freking1, Lauren O Erickson1, Christina Marie Ward2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN. Electronic address: christina.m.ward@healthpartners.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a difference in the incidence of infection between exposed and buried K-wires when used to treat phalangeal, metacarpal, and distal radius fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review identifying all patients aged greater than 16 years who underwent fixation of phalangeal, metacarpal, or distal radius fractures with K-wires between 2007 and 2015. We recorded patient demographic data, fracture location, number of K-wires used, whether K-wires were buried or left exposed, and duration of K-wire placement. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients met inclusion criteria. Surgeons buried K-wires in 207 patients and left K-wires exposed in 488. Infections occurred more frequently in exposed K-wire cases than in buried K-wire ones. Subgroup analysis based on fracture location revealed a significantly increased risk of being treated for infection when exposed K-wires were used for metacarpal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with exposed K-wires for fixation of phalangeal, metacarpal, or distal radius fractures were more likely to be treated for a pin-site infection than those with K-wires buried beneath the skin. Metacarpal fractures treated with exposed K-wires were 2 times more likely to be treated for a pin-site infection (17.6% of exposed K wire cases vs 8.7% of buried K wire cases). TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a difference in the incidence of infection between exposed and buried K-wires when used to treat phalangeal, metacarpal, and distal radius fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review identifying all patients aged greater than 16 years who underwent fixation of phalangeal, metacarpal, or distal radius fractures with K-wires between 2007 and 2015. We recorded patient demographic data, fracture location, number of K-wires used, whether K-wires were buried or left exposed, and duration of K-wire placement. RESULTS: A total of 695 patients met inclusion criteria. Surgeons buried K-wires in 207 patients and left K-wires exposed in 488. Infections occurred more frequently in exposed K-wire cases than in buried K-wire ones. Subgroup analysis based on fracture location revealed a significantly increased risk of being treated for infection when exposed K-wires were used for metacarpal fractures. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with exposed K-wires for fixation of phalangeal, metacarpal, or distal radius fractures were more likely to be treated for a pin-site infection than those with K-wires buried beneath the skin. Metacarpal fractures treated with exposed K-wires were 2 times more likely to be treated for a pin-site infection (17.6% of exposed K wire cases vs 8.7% of buried K wire cases). TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Authors: Andrew Sephien; Claire F Bethel; Danielle Gulick; Christa Nairn; Felicia Ourn; Francisco A Schwartz-Fernandes Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2019-10-28
Authors: Mohamed I Abulsoud; Mohammed Elmarghany; Tharwat Abdelghany; Mohamed Abdelaal; Mohamed F Elhalawany; Ahmed R Zakaria Journal: Adv Orthop Date: 2021-05-04
Authors: Letizia Senesi; Andrea Marchesini; Pier Paolo Pangrazi; Marialuisa De Francesco; Antonio Gigante; Michele Riccio; Francesco De Francesco Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 2.362