Stian Svenøy1, Marianne Westberg2, Wender Figved3, Haldor Valland4, Ole Christian Brun2, Helge Wangen5, Jan Erik Madsen2, Frede Frihagen2. 1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: ssveno@ous-hf.no. 2. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 3. Orthopaedic Department, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway. 4. Department of Surgery, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elverum Hospital, Brumunddal, Norway.
Abstract
AIM: To compare early complications after the posterior and the direct lateral (transgluteal) approach, when using hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective clinical study from four Norwegian hospitals, consisting of 583 patients with 1year follow-up. All the hospitals used the same uncemented femoral stem and bipolar heads. Data were collected for gender, age, surgical approach, prosthetic dislocation, postoperative infection, perioperative fracture, duration of surgery, ASA score, diabetes, alcoholism, cognitive failure, BMI, 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality. RESULTS:Mean age was 83 years (SD 7.8) and 434/583 (74%) were female. There were no relevant differences between the treatment groups. A higher risk was found for prosthetic dislocation in the posterior group compared to the lateral group (15/186 (8%) vs. 4/397 (1%); RR=8.0, 95% CI 2.7-23.8, p-value<0.001), both as a one-time event and for the risk of recurrent dislocations (9/186 (5%) vs. 2/395 (0.5%); RR 9.6, 95% CI 2.1-44.0, p-value=0.001). 11/19 patients with dislocation had recurrent dislocations. 10/11 patients with more than one dislocation needed further open surgery. Of those 6/10 needed more than one additional open procedure. Three patients had a resection arthroplasty and one patient had a chronic infection as final result after a dislocation. No other risk factor for dislocation than surgical approach was identified. There were no differences between the approach groups for other complications. CONCLUSION: There was an 8-fold increased risk for prosthetic dislocations after the posterior approach compared to lateral approach. There was a high risk for recurrent prosthetic dislocations and a subsequent risk for further surgeries and a poor end result. The potential advantages of the posterior approach have not been demonstrated after femoral neck fractures and we advise against its continued use.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To compare early complications after the posterior and the direct lateral (transgluteal) approach, when using hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective clinical study from four Norwegian hospitals, consisting of 583 patients with 1year follow-up. All the hospitals used the same uncemented femoral stem and bipolar heads. Data were collected for gender, age, surgical approach, prosthetic dislocation, postoperative infection, perioperative fracture, duration of surgery, ASA score, diabetes, alcoholism, cognitive failure, BMI, 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Mean age was 83 years (SD 7.8) and 434/583 (74%) were female. There were no relevant differences between the treatment groups. A higher risk was found for prosthetic dislocation in the posterior group compared to the lateral group (15/186 (8%) vs. 4/397 (1%); RR=8.0, 95% CI 2.7-23.8, p-value<0.001), both as a one-time event and for the risk of recurrent dislocations (9/186 (5%) vs. 2/395 (0.5%); RR 9.6, 95% CI 2.1-44.0, p-value=0.001). 11/19 patients with dislocation had recurrent dislocations. 10/11 patients with more than one dislocation needed further open surgery. Of those 6/10 needed more than one additional open procedure. Three patients had a resection arthroplasty and one patient had a chronic infection as final result after a dislocation. No other risk factor for dislocation than surgical approach was identified. There were no differences between the approach groups for other complications. CONCLUSION: There was an 8-fold increased risk for prosthetic dislocations after the posterior approach compared to lateral approach. There was a high risk for recurrent prosthetic dislocations and a subsequent risk for further surgeries and a poor end result. The potential advantages of the posterior approach have not been demonstrated after femoral neck fractures and we advise against its continued use.
Authors: E N de Vries; T J Gardenbroek; H Ammerlaan; F Steenstra; A M J S Vervest; M Hogervorst; R van Velde Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Taranjit Tung; Trevor C Gascoyne; Elly Trepman; Carole H Stipelman; Sarah Tran; Eric R Bohm; Colin D Burnell; David R Hedden; Thomas R Turgeon Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 2.840