Literature DB >> 28464562

Pattern mixture models for clinical validation of biomarkers in the presence of missing data.

Fei Gao1, Jun Dong2, Donglin Zeng1, Alan Rong3, Joseph G Ibrahim1.   

Abstract

Targeted therapies for cancers are sometimes only effective in a subset of patients with a particular biomarker status. In clinical development, the biomarker status is typically determined by an investigational-use-only/laboratory-developed test. A market ready test (MRT) is developed later to meet regulatory requirements and for future commercial use. In the USA, the clinical validation of MRT showing efficacy and safety profile of the targeted therapy in the biomarker subgroups determined by MRT is needed for pre-market approval. One of the major challenges in carrying out clinical validation is that the biomarker status per MRT is often missing for many subjects. In this paper, we treat biomarker status as a missing covariate and develop a novel pattern mixture model in the setting of a proportional hazards model for the time-to-event outcome variable. We specify a multinomial regression model for the missing biomarker statuses, and develop an expectation-maximization algorithm by the Method of Weights (Ibrahim, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1990) to estimate the parameters in the regression model. We use Louis' formula (Louis, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 1982) to obtain standard errors estimates. We examine the performance of our method in extensive simulation studies and apply our method to a clinical trial in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; companion diagnostics; missing data

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464562      PMCID: PMC5999041          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

1.  Monte Carlo EM for missing covariates in parametric regression models.

Authors:  J G Ibrahim; M H Chen; S R Lipsitz
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Douillard; Salvatore Siena; James Cassidy; Josep Tabernero; Ronald Burkes; Mario Barugel; Yves Humblet; György Bodoky; David Cunningham; Jacek Jassem; Fernando Rivera; Ilona Kocákova; Paul Ruff; Maria Błasińska-Morawiec; Martin Šmakal; Jean-Luc Canon; Mark Rother; Kelly S Oliner; Michael Wolf; Jennifer Gansert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Assessing the clinical utility of diagnostics used in drug therapy.

Authors:  J Woodcock
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets.

Authors:  M Gail; R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.