Literature DB >> 28464421

Low-frequency rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients: A systematic review.

L Sebastianelli1,2, V Versace1,2, S Martignago1,2, F Brigo3,4, E Trinka5, L Saltuari2,6, R Nardone3,5.   

Abstract

The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of low-frequency (LF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the unaffected hemisphere in promoting functional recovery after stroke. We performed a systematic search of the studies using LF-rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere in stroke patients and reviewed the 67 identified articles. The studies have been gathered together according to the time interval that had elapsed between the stroke onset and the beginning of the rTMS treatment. Inhibitory rTMS of the contralesional hemisphere can induce beneficial effects on stroke patients with motor impairment, spasticity, aphasia, hemispatial neglect and dysphagia, but the therapeutic clinical significance is unclear. We observed considerable heterogeneity across studies in the stimulation protocols. The use of different patient populations, regardless of lesion site and stroke aetiology, different stimulation parameters and outcome measures means that the studies are not readily comparable, and estimating real effectiveness or reproducibility is very difficult. It seems that careful experimental design is needed and it should consider patient selection aspects, rTMS parameters and clinical assessment tools. Consecutive sessions of rTMS, as well as the combination with conventional rehabilitation therapy, may increase the magnitude and duration of the beneficial effects. In an increasing number of studies, the patients have been enrolled early after stroke. The prolonged follow-up in these patients suggests that the effects of contralesional LF-rTMS can be long-lasting. However, physiological evidence indicating increased synaptic plasticity, and thus, a more favourable outcome, in the early enrolled patients, is still lacking. Carefully designed clinical trials designed are required to address this question. LF rTMS over unaffected hemisphere may have therapeutic utility, but the evidence is still preliminary and the findings need to be confirmed in further randomized controlled trials.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aphasia; dysphagia; motor function; neglect; rehabilitation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464421     DOI: 10.1111/ane.12773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  16 in total

1.  Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates resting-state EEG microstates in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Shuang Qiu; Shengpei Wang; Weiwei Peng; Weibo Yi; Chuncheng Zhang; Jing Zhang; Huiguang He
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 2.  Evaluation of rTMS in patients with poststroke aphasia: a systematic review and focused meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Gholami; Nooshin Pourbaghi; Samaneh Taghvatalab
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.830

3.  Is Aphasia Treatment Beneficial for the Elderly? A Review of Recent Evidence.

Authors:  Rachel Fabian; Lisa Bunker; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-09-18

4.  High frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation promotes long lasting phrenic motoneuron excitability via GABAergic networks.

Authors:  Pauline Michel-Flutot; Lyandysha V Zholudeva; Margo L Randelman; Therese B Deramaudt; Arnaud Mansart; Jean-Claude Alvarez; Kun-Ze Lee; Michel Petitjean; Marcel Bonay; Michael A Lane; Stéphane Vinit
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 5.  Versatility of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Poststroke Dysphagia.

Authors:  Soultana L Papadopoulou; Avraam Ploumis; G Exarchakos; S J Theodorou; A Beris; A D Fotopoulos
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

6.  The Effect of rTMS over the Different Targets on Language Recovery in Stroke Patients with Global Aphasia: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Caili Ren; Guofu Zhang; Xinlei Xu; Jianfeng Hao; Hui Fang; Ping Chen; Zhaohui Li; Yunyun Ji; Qingjie Cai; Fei Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Neurostimulation and Reach-to-Grasp Function Recovery Following Acquired Brain Injury: Insight From Pre-clinical Rodent Models and Human Applications.

Authors:  Charles-Francois V Latchoumane; Deborah A Barany; Lohitash Karumbaiah; Tarkeshwar Singh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Effects of Hand Training During the Aftereffect Period of Low-Frequency rTMS in Subacute Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Joo Won Park; Sang Beom Kim; Kyeong Woo Lee; Jong Hwa Lee; Jin Gee Park; Sook Joung Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-08-31

Review 9.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Functional Recovery After Stroke: Studies in Animal Models.

Authors:  Julia Boonzaier; Geralda A F van Tilborg; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; Rick M Dijkhuizen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Facilitation of Auditory Comprehension After Theta Burst Stimulation of Wernicke's Area in Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Viviana Versace; Kerstin Schwenker; Patrick B Langthaler; Stefan Golaszewski; Luca Sebastianelli; Francesco Brigo; Elke Pucks-Faes; Leopold Saltuari; Raffaele Nardone
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.