BACKGROUND: Patients with resectable esophageal cancer (rEC) are managed with either concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRSx) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (cCR). To the authors' knowledge, there is insufficient evidence comparing the overall survival of patients treated with these 2 options. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for rEC cases diagnosed from 2003 through 2011. Patients with previous cancers, cervical rEC, clinical stage T1N0 disease, or metastasis were excluded. cCR was defined as radiotherapy administered within 30 days of chemotherapy. CRSx was defined as cCR followed by esophagectomy within 90 days. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier methods, propensity score matching, and extended Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of the 11,122 eligible patients, 8091 (72.7%) received cCR and 3031 (27.3%) received CRSx. The odds of receiving CRSx were higher among patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II disease (vs stage III), adenocarcinoma (vs squamous cell carcinoma), lesions of the lower one-third of the esophagus, private insurance, and those living >25 miles from the treating facility or in areas with a higher median income or a greater percentage of high school-educated residents. Patients aged >70 years, female patients, African-American patients, those with ≥2 comorbidities, or those treated at community programs were more likely to receive cCR. After propensity score matching, the median and 10-year survival rates were found to be significantly better with CRSx (32.5 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 29.6-34.8 months] and 23.8% months [95% CI, 20.0-27.9 months], respectively) compared with cCR (14.2 months [95% CI, 13.4-15.5 months] and 6.1% months [95% CI, 3.9-9.0 months], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Data from the National Cancer Data Base support the inclusion of surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rEC. Cancer 2017;123:3476-85.
BACKGROUND:Patients with resectable esophageal cancer (rEC) are managed with either concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRSx) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (cCR). To the authors' knowledge, there is insufficient evidence comparing the overall survival of patients treated with these 2 options. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for rEC cases diagnosed from 2003 through 2011. Patients with previous cancers, cervical rEC, clinical stage T1N0 disease, or metastasis were excluded. cCR was defined as radiotherapy administered within 30 days of chemotherapy. CRSx was defined as cCR followed by esophagectomy within 90 days. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier methods, propensity score matching, and extended Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of the 11,122 eligible patients, 8091 (72.7%) received cCR and 3031 (27.3%) received CRSx. The odds of receiving CRSx were higher among patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II disease (vs stage III), adenocarcinoma (vs squamous cell carcinoma), lesions of the lower one-third of the esophagus, private insurance, and those living >25 miles from the treating facility or in areas with a higher median income or a greater percentage of high school-educated residents. Patients aged >70 years, female patients, African-American patients, those with ≥2 comorbidities, or those treated at community programs were more likely to receive cCR. After propensity score matching, the median and 10-year survival rates were found to be significantly better with CRSx (32.5 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 29.6-34.8 months] and 23.8% months [95% CI, 20.0-27.9 months], respectively) compared with cCR (14.2 months [95% CI, 13.4-15.5 months] and 6.1% months [95% CI, 3.9-9.0 months], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Data from the National Cancer Data Base support the inclusion of surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rEC. Cancer 2017;123:3476-85.
Authors: Aaron M Delman; Allison M Ammann; Kevin M Turner; Dennis M Vaysburg; Robert M Van Haren Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 2.895