Literature DB >> 28464220

Human Factors Effecting Forensic Decision Making: Workplace Stress and Well-being.

Amy M Jeanguenat1, Itiel E Dror2.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been a growing openness about the importance of human factors in forensic work. However, most of it focused on cognitive bias, and neglected issues of workplace wellness and stress. Forensic scientists work in a dynamic environment that includes common workplace pressures such as workload volume, tight deadlines, lack of advancement, number of working hours, low salary, technology distractions, and fluctuating priorities. However, in addition, forensic scientists also encounter a number of industry-specific pressures, such as technique criticism, repeated exposure to crime scenes or horrific case details, access to funding, working in an adversarial legal system, and zero tolerance for "errors". Thus, stress is an important human factor to mitigate for overall error management, productivity and decision quality (not to mention the well-being of the examiners themselves). Techniques such as mindfulness can become powerful tools to enhance work and decision quality.
© 2017 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive forensics; expert performance; forensic decision making; forensic error; forensic science; human factors; mindfulness; resilience; well-being; workplace stress

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464220     DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016-2019.

Authors:  Andy Bécue; Heidi Eldridge; Christophe Champod
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  (Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science.

Authors:  Itiel E Dror; Nicholas Scurich
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Interpol review of forensic science management literature 2016-2019.

Authors:  William P McAndrew; Max M Houck
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  How to influence positive change? Managers' involvement as emotional architects in the solution for relieving forensic examiners' workplace stress.

Authors:  Donta S Harper
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2021-12-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.