BACKGROUND: Tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock induce significant systemic metabolic reprogramming in animal models and critically injured patients. Recent expansions of the classic concepts of metabolomic aberrations in tissue injury and hemorrhage opened the way for novel resuscitative interventions based on the observed abnormal metabolic demands. We hypothesize that metabolic demands and resulting metabolic signatures in pig plasma will vary in response to isolated or combined tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock. METHODS: A total of 20 pigs underwent either isolated tissue injury, hemorrhagic shock, or combined tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock referenced to a sham protocol (n = 5/group). Plasma samples were analyzed by UHPLC-MS. RESULTS: Hemorrhagic shock promoted a hypermetabolic state. Tissue injury alone dampened metabolic responses in comparison to sham and hemorrhagic shock, and attenuated the hypermetabolic state triggered by shock with respect to energy metabolism (glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and Krebs cycle). Tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock had a more pronounced effect on nitrogen metabolism (arginine, polyamines, and purine metabolism) than hemorrhagic shock alone. CONCLUSION: Isolated or combined tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock result in distinct plasma metabolic signatures. These findings indicate that optimized resuscitative interventions in critically ill patients are possible based on identifying the severity of tissue injury and hemorrhage.
BACKGROUND: Tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock induce significant systemic metabolic reprogramming in animal models and critically injured patients. Recent expansions of the classic concepts of metabolomic aberrations in tissue injury and hemorrhage opened the way for novel resuscitative interventions based on the observed abnormal metabolic demands. We hypothesize that metabolic demands and resulting metabolic signatures in pig plasma will vary in response to isolated or combined tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock. METHODS: A total of 20 pigs underwent either isolated tissue injury, hemorrhagic shock, or combined tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock referenced to a sham protocol (n = 5/group). Plasma samples were analyzed by UHPLC-MS. RESULTS:Hemorrhagic shock promoted a hypermetabolic state. Tissue injury alone dampened metabolic responses in comparison to sham and hemorrhagic shock, and attenuated the hypermetabolic state triggered by shock with respect to energy metabolism (glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and Krebs cycle). Tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock had a more pronounced effect on nitrogen metabolism (arginine, polyamines, and purine metabolism) than hemorrhagic shock alone. CONCLUSION: Isolated or combined tissue injury and hemorrhagic shock result in distinct plasma metabolic signatures. These findings indicate that optimized resuscitative interventions in critically illpatients are possible based on identifying the severity of tissue injury and hemorrhage.
Authors: Angelo D'Alessandro; Hunter B Moore; Ernest E Moore; Matthew Wither; Travis Nemkov; Eduardo Gonzalez; Anne Slaughter; Miguel Fragoso; Kirk C Hansen; Christopher C Silliman; Anirban Banerjee Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Anne L Slaughter; Angelo D'Alessandro; Ernest E Moore; Anirban Banerjee; Christopher C Silliman; Kirk C Hansen; Julie A Reisz; Miguel Fragoso; Matthew J Wither; Anthony W Bacon; Hunter B Moore; Erik D Peltz Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Angelo D'Alessandro; Hunter B Moore; Ernest E Moore; Matthew J Wither; Travis Nemkov; Alexander P Morton; Eduardo Gonzalez; Michael P Chapman; Miguel Fragoso; Anne Slaughter; Angela Sauaia; Christopher C Silliman; Kirk C Hansen; Anirban Banerjee Journal: Shock Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Monika Dzieciatkowska; Angelo D'Alessandro; Ernest E Moore; Max Wohlauer; Anirban Banerjee; Christopher C Silliman; Kirk C Hansen Journal: Shock Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Victoria R Pell; Edward T Chouchani; Christian Frezza; Michael P Murphy; Thomas Krieg Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Nathan Clendenen; Geoffrey R Nunns; Ernest E Moore; Eduardo Gonzalez; Michael Chapman; Julie A Reisz; Erik Peltz; Miguel Fragoso; Travis Nemkov; Matthew J Wither; Angela Sauaia; Christopher C Silliman; Kirk Hansen; Anirban Banerjee; Angelo D'Alessandro; Hunter B Moore Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2018-12-13 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Jan Küchler; Stephan Klaus; Ludger Bahlmann; Nils Onken; Alexander Keck; Emma Smith; Jan Gliemroth; Claudia Ditz Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Julie A Reisz; Anne L Slaughter; Rachel Culp-Hill; Ernest E Moore; Christopher C Silliman; Miguel Fragoso; Erik D Peltz; Kirk C Hansen; Anirban Banerjee; Angelo D'Alessandro Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2017-07-14
Authors: Julie A Reisz; Matthew J Wither; Ernest E Moore; Anne L Slaughter; Hunter B Moore; Arsen Ghasabyan; James Chandler; Leasha J Schaub; Miguel Fragoso; Geoffrey Nunns; Christopher C Silliman; Kirk C Hansen; Anirban Banerjee; Forest R Sheppard; Angelo D'Alessandro Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Lorenzo Bertolone; Hye Kyung H Shin; Jin Hyen Baek; Yamei Gao; Steven L Spitalnik; Paul W Buehler; Angelo D'Alessandro Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Todd O McKinley; Roman M Natoli; James P Fischer; Jeffrey D Rytlewski; David C Scofield; Rashad Usmani; Alexander Kuzma; Kaitlyn S Griffin; Emily Jewell; Paul Childress; Karl D Shively; Tien-Min Gabriel Chu; Jeffrey O Anglen; Melissa A Kacena Journal: Mil Med Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Lorenzo Bertolone; Hye K Shin; Davide Stefanoni; Jin Hyen Baek; Yamei Gao; Evan J Morrison; Travis Nemkov; Tiffany Thomas; Richard O Francis; Eldad A Hod; James C Zimring; Tatsuro Yoshida; Matthew Karafin; Joseph Schwartz; Krystalyn E Hudson; Steven L Spitalnik; Paul W Buehler; Angelo D'Alessandro Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 4.566