Jill Beattie1, Helen Hall2, Mary Anne Biro3, Christine East4, Rosalind Lau5. 1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Building E, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia. Electronic address: jill.beattie@monash.edu. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Building E, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia. Electronic address: helen.hall@monash.edu. 3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Building E, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia. Electronic address: Maryanne.biro@monashe.edu. 4. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Building E, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia; Monash Women's Maternity Services, Birth Suite, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. Electronic address: Christine.east@monash.edu. 5. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Building E, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia. Electronic address: Rosalind.lau@monash.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability and measure the effects of a mindfulness intervention compared to a pregnancy support program on stress, depressive symptoms and awareness of present moment experience. DESIGN: A pilot randomised trial using mixed methods. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING:Forty-eight women attending a maternity service were randomly allocated to a mindfulness-based or pregnancy support program. MEASURES: Perceived Stress Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, and Birth Outcomes. Women's perceptions of the impact of the programs were examined via summative evaluation, interviews, diaries and facilitator field notes. FINDINGS: Nine women in the mindfulness program and 11 in the pregnancy support program completed post-program measures. There were no statistically significant differences between groups. Of practical significance, was an improvement in measures for both groups with a greater improvement in awareness of present moment experience for the intervention group. The intervention group reported learning how to manage stressors, fear, anxiety, and to regulate their attention to be more present. The control group reported learning how to calm down when stressed which increased their confidence. Intervention group themes were: releasing stress, becoming aware, accepting, having options and choices, connecting and being compassionate. Control group themes were:managing stress, increasing confidence, connecting, focussing, being accepted, preparing. KEY CONCLUSION: The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention was confirmed. Programs decreased women's self-reported stress in different ways. Women in the mindfulness program accepted themselves and their experiences as they arose and passed in the present moment, while those in the control group gained acceptance primarily from external sources such as peers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Mindfulness programs can foster an internalised locus of self-acceptance which may result in woman becoming less dependent on others for their wellbeing. Adequately powered RCTs, with an active control, long-term follow up and economic evaluation are recommended.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability and measure the effects of a mindfulness intervention compared to a pregnancy support program on stress, depressive symptoms and awareness of present moment experience. DESIGN: A pilot randomised trial using mixed methods. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Forty-eight women attending a maternity service were randomly allocated to a mindfulness-based or pregnancy support program. MEASURES: Perceived Stress Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, and Birth Outcomes. Women's perceptions of the impact of the programs were examined via summative evaluation, interviews, diaries and facilitator field notes. FINDINGS: Nine women in the mindfulness program and 11 in the pregnancy support program completed post-program measures. There were no statistically significant differences between groups. Of practical significance, was an improvement in measures for both groups with a greater improvement in awareness of present moment experience for the intervention group. The intervention group reported learning how to manage stressors, fear, anxiety, and to regulate their attention to be more present. The control group reported learning how to calm down when stressed which increased their confidence. Intervention group themes were: releasing stress, becoming aware, accepting, having options and choices, connecting and being compassionate. Control group themes were:managing stress, increasing confidence, connecting, focussing, being accepted, preparing. KEY CONCLUSION: The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention was confirmed. Programs decreased women's self-reported stress in different ways. Women in the mindfulness program accepted themselves and their experiences as they arose and passed in the present moment, while those in the control group gained acceptance primarily from external sources such as peers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Mindfulness programs can foster an internalised locus of self-acceptance which may result in woman becoming less dependent on others for their wellbeing. Adequately powered RCTs, with an active control, long-term follow up and economic evaluation are recommended.
Authors: Caroline-Aleksi Olsson Mägi; Anders Bjerg Bäcklund; Karin Lødrup Carlsen; Catarina Almqvist; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; Berit Granum; Guttorm Haugen; Katarina Hilde; Oda C Lødrup Carlsen; Christine Monceyron Jonassen; Eva Maria Rehbinder; Katrine D Sjøborg; Håvard Skjerven; Anne Cathrine Staff; Riyas Vettukattil; Cilla Söderhäll; Björn Nordlund Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2020-10-13
Authors: Julieta Galante; Claire Friedrich; Anna F Dawson; Marta Modrego-Alarcón; Pia Gebbing; Irene Delgado-Suárez; Radhika Gupta; Lydia Dean; Tim Dalgleish; Ian R White; Peter B Jones Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 11.069