Literature DB >> 28463612

Augmented-reality integrated robotics in neurosurgery: are we there yet?

Karthik Madhavan1, John Paul G Kolcun1, Lee Onn Chieng1, Michael Y Wang1.   

Abstract

Surgical robots have captured the interest-if not the widespread acceptance-of spinal neurosurgeons. But successful innovation, scientific or commercial, requires the majority to adopt a new practice. "Faster, better, cheaper" products should in theory conquer the market, but often fail. The psychology of change is complex, and the "follow the leader" mentality, common in the field today, lends little trust to the process of disseminating new technology. Beyond product quality, timing has proven to be a key factor in the inception, design, and execution of new technologies. Although the first robotic surgery was performed in 1985, scant progress was seen until the era of minimally invasive surgery. This movement increased neurosurgeons' dependence on navigation and fluoroscopy, intensifying the drive for enhanced precision. Outside the field of medicine, various technology companies have made great progress in popularizing co-robots ("cobots"), augmented reality, and processor chips. This has helped to ease practicing surgeons into familiarity with and acceptance of these technologies. The adoption among neurosurgeons in training is a "follow the leader" phenomenon, wherein new surgeons tend to adopt the technology used during residency. In neurosurgery today, robots are limited to computers functioning between the surgeon and patient. Their functions are confined to establishing a trajectory for navigation, with task execution solely in the surgeon's hands. In this review, the authors discuss significant untapped technologies waiting to be used for more meaningful applications. They explore the history and current manifestations of various modern technologies, and project what innovations may lie ahead.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AR = augmented reality; CPU = central processing unit; Google Glass; MIS = minimally invasive surgery; OR = operating room; PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; Project Tango; VR = virtual reality; augmented reality; navigation; spine; virtual reality;  robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28463612     DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  4 in total

1.  Reduction in complication and revision rates for robotic-guided short-segment lumbar fusion surgery: results of a prospective, multi-center study.

Authors:  Jason I Liounakos; Vignessh Kumar; Aria Jamshidi; Zmira Silman; Christopher R Good; Samuel R Schroerlucke; Andrew Cannestra; Victor Hsu; Jae Lim; Faissal Zahrawi; Pedro M Ramirez; Thomas M Sweeney; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 2.  Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: History, Efficacy, Cost, And Future Trends.

Authors:  Marissa D'Souza; Julian Gendreau; Austin Feng; Lily H Kim; Allen L Ho; Anand Veeravagu
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2019-11-07

Review 3.  An Examination of Prospective Uses and Future Directions of Neuralink: The Brain-Machine Interface.

Authors:  Brian Fiani; Taylor Reardon; Benjamin Ayres; David Cline; Sarah R Sitto
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-30

Review 4.  Virtual Reality in Neurosurgery: Beyond Neurosurgical Planning.

Authors:  Rakesh Mishra; M D Krishna Narayanan; Giuseppe E Umana; Nicola Montemurro; Bipin Chaurasia; Harsh Deora
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.