Min Ji Hong1, Dong Gyu Na2, Jung Hwan Baek3, Jin Yong Sung4, Ji-Hoon Kim5. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center , Incheon, Korea. 2. 2 Department of Radiology, Human Medical Imaging and Intervention Center , Seoul, Korea. 3. 3 Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea. 4. 4 Department of Radiology, Thyroid Center, Daerim St. Mary's Hospital , Seoul, Korea. 5. 5 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The malignancy risk of a cytology diagnosis may depend on the ultrasonography (US) patterns of thyroid nodules, and management should be determined by the combined malignancy risk of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology and US patterns. This study was performed to develop a clinically applicable cytology-ultrasonography (CU) scoring system for malignancy risk stratification based on FNA cytology and US patterns, according to the Korean-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS). METHODS: This retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study included 1651 thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) with final diagnoses. The malignancy risk was assessed of the combined results of FNA cytology and the K-TIRADS for the development of the CU system. The interaction between FNA cytology and US pattern (K-TIRADS) in the malignancy risk of nodules was investigated by using a binominal test. RESULTS: The malignancy risk of nodules could be stratified into four CU scores (very low risk, <3%; low risk, ≥3%, <30%; high risk, ≥30%, <90%; very high risk, ≥90%). In nodules with non-diagnostic, benign, and atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology results, low-suspicion US pattern (K-TIRADS 3) significantly decreased the malignancy risk of nodules (p = 0.003, 0.013, and 0.027, respectively), and a high-suspicion US pattern (K-TIRADS 5) significantly increased the malignancy risk of nodules (p ≤ 0.001). A Bethesda 1 or 4 cytology result did not significantly change the malignancy risk of any K-TIRADS (p ≥ 0.518 and p ≥ 0.137, respectively). A Bethesda 2 cytology result decreased and a Bethesda 5 or 6 cytology result increased the malignancy risk of K-TIRADS 3, 4, and 5 (p ≤ 0.001). A Bethesda 3 cytology result increased the malignancy risk of K-TIRADS 3 and 4 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSION: The malignancy risk of thyroid nodules can be stratified by the CU risk-stratification system, based on FNA cytology and the K-TIRADS. The proposed CU scoring system may be helpful in the management of thyroid nodules after FNA.
BACKGROUND: The malignancy risk of a cytology diagnosis may depend on the ultrasonography (US) patterns of thyroid nodules, and management should be determined by the combined malignancy risk of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology and US patterns. This study was performed to develop a clinically applicable cytology-ultrasonography (CU) scoring system for malignancy risk stratification based on FNA cytology and US patterns, according to the Korean-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS). METHODS: This retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study included 1651 thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) with final diagnoses. The malignancy risk was assessed of the combined results of FNA cytology and the K-TIRADS for the development of the CU system. The interaction between FNA cytology and US pattern (K-TIRADS) in the malignancy risk of nodules was investigated by using a binominal test. RESULTS: The malignancy risk of nodules could be stratified into four CU scores (very low risk, <3%; low risk, ≥3%, <30%; high risk, ≥30%, <90%; very high risk, ≥90%). In nodules with non-diagnostic, benign, and atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology results, low-suspicion US pattern (K-TIRADS 3) significantly decreased the malignancy risk of nodules (p = 0.003, 0.013, and 0.027, respectively), and a high-suspicion US pattern (K-TIRADS 5) significantly increased the malignancy risk of nodules (p ≤ 0.001). A Bethesda 1 or 4 cytology result did not significantly change the malignancy risk of any K-TIRADS (p ≥ 0.518 and p ≥ 0.137, respectively). A Bethesda 2 cytology result decreased and a Bethesda 5 or 6 cytology result increased the malignancy risk of K-TIRADS 3, 4, and 5 (p ≤ 0.001). A Bethesda 3 cytology result increased the malignancy risk of K-TIRADS 3 and 4 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSION: The malignancy risk of thyroid nodules can be stratified by the CU risk-stratification system, based on FNA cytology and the K-TIRADS. The proposed CU scoring system may be helpful in the management of thyroid nodules after FNA.
Authors: Kepal N Patel; Trevor E Angell; Joshua Babiarz; Neil M Barth; Thomas Blevins; Quan-Yang Duh; Ronald A Ghossein; R Mack Harrell; Jing Huang; Giulia C Kennedy; Su Yeon Kim; Richard T Kloos; Virginia A LiVolsi; Gregory W Randolph; Peter M Sadow; Michael H Shanik; Julie A Sosa; S Thomas Traweek; P Sean Walsh; Duncan Whitney; Michael W Yeh; Paul W Ladenson Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Kelly Daniels; Sriharsha Gummadi; Ziyin Zhu; Shuo Wang; Jena Patel; Brian Swendseid; Andrej Lyshchik; Joseph Curry; Elizabeth Cottrill; John Eisenbrey Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Su Min Ha; Jung Hwan Baek; Young Jun Choi; Sae Rom Chung; Tae Yon Sung; Tae Yong Kim; Jeong Hyun Lee Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ji Ye Lee; Dong Gyu Na; So Jin Yoon; Hye Yun Gwon; Wooyul Paik; Taeeun Kim; Jin Yub Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 5.315