Inga-Marie Schaefer1, Jason L Hornick1, Constance M Barysauskas2, Chandrajit P Raut3, Sagar A Patel4, Trevor J Royce4, Christopher D M Fletcher1, Elizabeth H Baldini5. 1. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ebaldini@partners.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To critically assess the prognostic value of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC-STBSG) response score and define histologic appearance after preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For a cohort of 100 patients with STS of the extremity/trunk treated at our institution with preoperative RT followed by resection, 2 expert sarcoma pathologists evaluated the resected specimens for percent residual viable cells, necrosis, hyalinization/fibrosis, and infarction. The EORTC response score and other predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Median tumor size was 7.5 cm; 92% were intermediate or high grade. Most common histologies were unclassified sarcoma (34%) and myxofibrosarcoma (25%). Median follow-up was 60 months. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5%, 5-year RFS was 68%, and 5-year OS was 75%. Distribution of cases according to EORTC response score tiers was as follows: no residual viable tumor for 9 cases (9% pathologic complete response); <1% viable tumor for 0, ≥1% to <10% for 9, ≥10% to <50% for 44, and ≥50% for 38. There was no association between EORTC-STBSG response score and RFS or OS. Conversely, hyalinization/fibrosis was a significant independent favorable predictor for RFS (hazard ratio 0.49, P=.007) and OS (hazard ratio 0.36, P=.02). CONCLUSION: Histologic evaluation after preoperative RT for STS showed a 9% pathologic complete response rate. The EORTC-STBSG response score and percent viable cells were not prognostic. Hyalinization/fibrosis was associated with favorable outcome, and if validated, may become a valid endpoint for neoadjuvant trials.
PURPOSE: To critically assess the prognostic value of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC-STBSG) response score and define histologic appearance after preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For a cohort of 100 patients with STS of the extremity/trunk treated at our institution with preoperative RT followed by resection, 2 expert sarcoma pathologists evaluated the resected specimens for percent residual viable cells, necrosis, hyalinization/fibrosis, and infarction. The EORTC response score and other predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Median tumor size was 7.5 cm; 92% were intermediate or high grade. Most common histologies were unclassified sarcoma (34%) and myxofibrosarcoma (25%). Median follow-up was 60 months. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5%, 5-year RFS was 68%, and 5-year OS was 75%. Distribution of cases according to EORTC response score tiers was as follows: no residual viable tumor for 9 cases (9% pathologic complete response); <1% viable tumor for 0, ≥1% to <10% for 9, ≥10% to <50% for 44, and ≥50% for 38. There was no association between EORTC-STBSG response score and RFS or OS. Conversely, hyalinization/fibrosis was a significant independent favorable predictor for RFS (hazard ratio 0.49, P=.007) and OS (hazard ratio 0.36, P=.02). CONCLUSION: Histologic evaluation after preoperative RT for STS showed a 9% pathologic complete response rate. The EORTC-STBSG response score and percent viable cells were not prognostic. Hyalinization/fibrosis was associated with favorable outcome, and if validated, may become a valid endpoint for neoadjuvant trials.
Authors: Emily Z Keung; Jen-Wei Tsai; Ali M Ali; Janice N Cormier; Andrew J Bishop; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Keila E Torres; Neeta Somaiah; Kelly K Hunt; Jennifer A Wargo; Alexander J Lazar; Wei-Lien Wang; Christina L Roland Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Anusha Kalbasi; Mitchell Kamrava; Fang-I Chu; Donatello Telesca; Ritchell Van Dams; Yingli Yang; Dan Ruan; Scott D Nelson; Sarah M Dry; Jackie Hernandez; Bartosz Chmielowski; Arun S Singh; Susan V Bukata; Nicholas M Bernthal; Michael L Steinberg; Joanne B Weidhaas; Fritz C Eilber Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christian Isaac; John Kavanagh; Anthony Michael Griffin; Colleen I Dickie; Rakesh Mohankumar; Peter W Chung; Charles N Catton; David Shultz; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Aaron R Weiss; Yen-Lin Chen; Thomas J Scharschmidt; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Tian; Jennifer O Black; Jessica L Davis; Julie C Fanburg-Smith; Eduardo Zambrano; James Anderson; Robin Arens; Odion Binitie; Edwin Choy; Justin W Davis; Andrea Hayes-Jordan; Simon C Kao; Mark L Kayton; Sandy Kessel; Ruth Lim; William H Meyer; Lynn Million; Scott H Okuno; Andrew Ostrenga; Marguerite T Parisi; Daniel A Pryma; R Lor Randall; Mark A Rosen; Mary Schlapkohl; Barry L Shulkin; Ethan A Smith; Joel I Sorger; Stephanie Terezakis; Douglas S Hawkins; Sheri L Spunt; Dian Wang Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Marc G Stevenson; Lukas B Been; Harald J Hoekstra; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Ronald Boellaard; Adrienne H Brouwers Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Emily Z Keung; Alexander J Lazar; Keila E Torres; Wei-Lien Wang; Janice N Cormier; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Andrew J Bishop; Heather Lin; Kelly K Hunt; Justin Bird; Valerae O Lewis; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Jennifer A Wargo; Neeta Somaiah; Christina L Roland Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Sarah Z Hazell; Chen Hu; Sara R Alcorn; Kingsley O Asiedu; Gillian Pulido; Deborah A Frassica; Christian Meyer; Adam S Levin; Carol D Morris; Stephanie A Terezakis Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-10-07