Literature DB >> 2846300

Comparative in vitro activity of the new oral macrolide azithromycin.

H C Neu1, N X Chin, G Saha, P Labthavikul.   

Abstract

The in vitro activity of the new oral macrolide azithromycin was compared with that of erythromycin against gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Ninety percent of hemolytic streptococci groups A and B, and Streptococcus pneumoniae were inhibited by 0.5 microgram/ml. Activity of azithromycin was similar to that of erythromycin; erythromycin-resistant staphylococci and streptococci were not inhibited. Azithromycin was more active than erythromycin against Haemophilus influenzae (MIC90 1 microgram/ml) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. It inhibited Campylobacter spp. and Pasteurella multocida, and had an MIC50 of 8 micrograms/ml for Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica compared to an erythromycin value of greater than 64 micrograms/ml.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2846300     DOI: 10.1007/bf01962611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  1 in total

1.  Erythromycin: a microbial and clinical perspective after 30 years of clinical use (1).

Authors:  J A Washington; W R Wilson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.616

  1 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Spectrum of activity of azithromycin.

Authors:  J D Williams
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Effects of environmental factors on the in vitro potency of azithromycin.

Authors:  J A Retsema; L A Brennan; A E Girard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Influence of the test medium on azithromycin and erythromycin regression statistics.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Beta-lactamase production in Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens, and Prevotella pallens genotypes and in vitro susceptibilities to selected antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  J Mättö; S Asikainen; M L Väisänen; B Von Troil-Lindén; E Könönen; M Saarela; K Salminen; S M Finegold; H Jousimies-Somer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Options for treating resistant Shigella species infections in children.

Authors:  Sharon M Erdman; Elizabeth E Buckner; Janet F Hindler
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-01

Review 6.  Commonly used antibacterial and antifungal agents for hospitalised paediatric patients: implications for therapy with an emphasis on clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J Singh; B Burr; D Stringham; A Arrieta
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

7.  Inhibition of motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis by subinhibitory concentrations of azithromycin.

Authors:  G Molinari; P Paglia; G C Schito
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  D H Peters; H A Friedel; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Double-blind randomized study comparing the efficacies and safeties of a short (3-day) course of azithromycin and a 5-day course of amoxicillin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Authors:  J C Mertens; P W van Barneveld; H R Asin; E Ligtvoet; M R Visser; T Branger; A I Hoepelman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Outer membrane permeability barrier to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxithromycin in gram-negative enteric bacteria.

Authors:  M Vaara
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.