Literature DB >> 28462899

Sex Ratios at Birth Among Indian Immigrant Subgroups According to Time Spent in Canada.

Amanpreet Brar1, Susitha Wanigaratne2, Ariel Pulver3, Joel G Ray2, Marcelo L Urquia4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether son-biased male to female (M:F) ratios at birth among linguistically different subgroups of Indian immigrants vary according to duration of residence in Canada.
METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 46 834 live births to Indian-born mothers who gave birth in Canada between 1993 and 2014. The M:F ratio at birth was calculated according to the sex of previous live births and stratified by (1) time since immigration to Canada (<10 and ≥10 years) and (2) mother tongue (Punjabi, Gujarati, Hindi, and other). We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariate logistic regression to assess the probability of having a male newborn with 5-year increases in duration of residence in Canada for each language group. ORs were adjusted for married status, knowledge of English/French, maternal education at arrival and age and neighbourhood income at delivery.
RESULTS: Among all Indian immigrant women with two previous daughters, M:F ratios were higher than expected (1.92, 95% CI 1.73-2.12), particularly among those whose mother tongue was Punjabi (n = 25 287) (2.40, 95% CI 2.11-2.72) and Hindi (n = 7752) (1.63, 95% CI 1.05-2.52). M:F ratios did not diminish with longer duration in Canada (Punjabi 5-year aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.31; Hindi 5-year aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.42-2.17).
CONCLUSION: Among the Punjabi and Hindi women with two previous daughters, longer duration of residence did not attenuate son-biased M:F ratios at the third birth. Gender equity promotion may focus on Punjabi- and Hindi-speaking Indian immigrant women regardless of how long they have lived in Canada.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; India; Sex ratio; acculturation; immigration; language

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28462899     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  8 in total

1.  Male-biased sex ratios in Australian migrant populations: a population-based study of 1 191 250 births 1999-2015.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Anna Axmon; Rhonda Powell; Mary-Ann Davey
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Sex ratios at birth among second-generation mothers of South Asian ethnicity in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Susitha Wanigaratne; Pamela Uppal; Manvir Bhangoo; Alia Januwalla; Deepa Singal; Marcelo L Urquia
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Association of source country gender inequality with experiencing assault and poor mental health among young female immigrants to Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Michael Lebenbaum; Therese A Stukel; Natasha Ruth Saunders; Hong Lu; Marcelo Urquia; Paul Kurdyak; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Sex ratios and 'missing women' among Asian minority and migrant populations in Aotearoa/New Zealand: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Simon-Kumar; Janine Paynter; Annie Chiang; Nimisha Chabba
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Trends in female-selective abortion among Asian diasporas in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia.

Authors:  Catherine Meh; Prabhat Jha
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Sex ratios at birth in Australia according to mother's country of birth: A national study of all 5 614 847 reported live births 1997-2016.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Mary-Ann Davey; Rhonda Powell; Anna Axmon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Receipt of routine preventive care among infant daughters and sons of immigrant mothers in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ariel Pulver; Astrid Guttmann; Joel G Ray; Patricia J O'Campo; Marcelo L Urquia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues.

Authors:  Hilary Bowman-Smart; Julian Savulescu; Christopher Gyngell; Cara Mand; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.050

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.