Güldal Funda Nakipoğlu Yuzer1, Burcu Köse Dönmez2, Neşe Özgirgin2. 1. Ankara Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: guldalfunda@hotmail.com. 2. Ankara Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
AIM: The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to the wrist and finger extensors for wrist flexor spasticity in hemiplegic patients. METHODS:Thirty stroke patients treated as inpatients were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into study and control groups. FES was applied to the study group. Wrist range of movement, the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA), Brunnstrom (BS) hand neurophysiological staging, Barthel Index (BI), and Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT) are outcome measures. RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding range of motion (ROM) and BI values on admission between the groups. A significant difference was found in favor of the study group for these values at discharge. In the assessment within groups, there was no significant difference between admission and discharge RMA, BS hand, and UEFT scores in the control group, but there was a significant difference between the admission and discharge values for these parameters in the study group. Both groups showed improvement in MAS values on internal assessment. CONCLUSION: It was determined that FES application is an effective method to reduce spasticity and to improve ROM, motor, and functional outcomes in hemiplegic wrist flexor spasticity.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to the wrist and finger extensors for wrist flexor spasticity in hemiplegic patients. METHODS: Thirty strokepatients treated as inpatients were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into study and control groups. FES was applied to the study group. Wrist range of movement, the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA), Brunnstrom (BS) hand neurophysiological staging, Barthel Index (BI), and Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT) are outcome measures. RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding range of motion (ROM) and BI values on admission between the groups. A significant difference was found in favor of the study group for these values at discharge. In the assessment within groups, there was no significant difference between admission and discharge RMA, BS hand, and UEFT scores in the control group, but there was a significant difference between the admission and discharge values for these parameters in the study group. Both groups showed improvement in MAS values on internal assessment. CONCLUSION: It was determined that FES application is an effective method to reduce spasticity and to improve ROM, motor, and functional outcomes in hemiplegic wrist flexor spasticity.
Authors: Mijail D Serruya; Alessandro Napoli; Nicholas Satterthwaite; Joe Kardine; Joseph McCoy; Namrata Grampurohit; Kiran Talekar; Devon M Middleton; Feroze Mohamed; Michael Kogan; Ashwini Sharan; Chengyuan Wu; Robert H Rosenwasser Journal: Commun Med (Lond) Date: 2022-04-07