| Literature DB >> 28462746 |
Winona Burgess1, Alyssa Margolis1, Sara Gibbs1, Rafael Silva Duarte2, Mary Jackson1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Activated alkaline glutaraldehyde (GTA) remains one of the most widely used high-level disinfectants worldwide. However, several reports have highlighted the potential for nontuberculous mycobacteria to develop high-level resistance to this product. Because aldehyde resistance may lead to cross-resistance to other biocides, we investigated the susceptibility profile of GTA-resistant Mycobacterium chelonae and M. abscessus isolates to various disinfectant chemistries. METHODS High-level disinfectants commonly used in the reprocessing of endoscopes and other heat-sensitive, semicritical medical equipment, including different formulations of aldehyde-based products and oxidizing agents, were tested against 10 slow- and fast-growing, GTA-susceptible and GTA-resistant, Mycobacterium isolates in suspension tests and carrier tests at different temperatures. RESULTS While peracetic acid- and hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectants (S40, Resert XL, Reliance DG) efficiently killed all of the Mycobacterium isolates, GTA- and ortho-phthalaldehyde-based products (ie, Cidex, Aldahol, Cidex OPA) showed variable efficacy against GTA-resistant strains despite the ability of some formulations (Aldahol) to overcome the resistance of some of these isolates, especially when the temperature was increased from 20°C to 25°C. CONCLUSIONS Application permitting, oxidizing chemistries may provide a safe alternative to aldehyde-based products, particularly in GTA-resistant mycobacterial outbreaks. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:784-791.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28462746 PMCID: PMC5507614 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.75
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ISSN: 0899-823X Impact factor: 3.254