Literature DB >> 28462503

Influences of speech familiarity on immediate perception and final comprehension.

Lynn K Perry1, Emily N Mech2, Maryellen C MacDonald3, Mark S Seidenberg3.   

Abstract

Unfamiliar speech-spoken in a familiar language but with an accent different from the listener's-is known to increase comprehension difficulty. However, there is evidence of listeners' rapid adaptation to unfamiliar accents (although perhaps not to the level of familiar accents). This paradox might emerge from prior focus on isolated word perception and/or use of single comprehension measures. We investigated processing of fluent connected speech spoken either in a familiar or unfamiliar accent, using participants' ability to "shadow" the speech as an immediate measure as well as a comprehension test at passage end. Shadowing latencies and errors and comprehension errors increased for Unfamiliar relative to Familiar Speech conditions, especially for relatively informal rather than more academic content. Additionally, there was evidence of less adaptation to Unfamiliar than Familiar Speech. These results suggest that unfamiliar speech imposes costs, especially in the immediate timescale of perceiving speech.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accented speech; Listening comprehension; Speech perception; Speech shadowing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28462503     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1297-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  The role of variation in the perception of accented speech.

Authors:  Meghan Sumner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-08

2.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Does a regional accent perturb speech processing?

Authors:  Caroline Floccia; Jeremy Goslin; Frédérique Girard; Gabrielle Konopczynski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Bronwen G Evans; Jane Stuart-Smith; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The weckud wetch of the wast: lexical adaptation to a novel accent.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-05

7.  Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Adaptation to novel accents by toddlers.

Authors:  Katherine S White; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03

9.  The native language of social cognition.

Authors:  Katherine D Kinzler; Emmanuel Dupoux; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Listening effort and accented speech.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  The own-voice benefit for word recognition in early bilinguals.

Authors:  Sarah Cheung; Molly Babel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.