Literature DB >> 28462404

Association between electromagnetic field exposure and abortion in pregnant women living in Tehran.

Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi1,2, Seyed Alireza Mortazavi3, Maryam Paknahad4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28462404      PMCID: PMC5405225     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)        ISSN: 2476-3772


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor With great interest, we have read the article by Abad et al. entitled “Association between electromagnetic field exposure and abortion in pregnant women living in Tehran” that is published in International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine Vol. 14. No. 5. pp: 347-354, May 2016. In this article, the authors evaluated the possible associations between electromagnetic waves exposure level and the rate of miscarriage in pregnant women. The electromagnetic radiation, in this study, had a significant association with the increased abortion in women who were exposed to these radiations. These findings were based on the measurements of electromagnetic waves within the residential locations of the 413 samples, very close to the entrance door of their home, according to the standard instructions of ICNIRP. Over the past several years, our laboratories at the Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC) have expanded their focus on studying the health effects of exposure to some common and/or occupational sources of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) such as cellular phones (1-9), mobile base stations (10), mobile phone jammers (11, 12), laptop computers (13), radars (2), dentistry cavitrons (14) and MRI (15, 16). Although the paper authored by Abad et al. is a well-structured article and addresses a very challenging issue, it has some major shortcomings. The first shortcoming of this paper comes from this cardinal point that the authors have simply ignored the role of exposure to extremely low frequency EMFs (e.g. exposure of the pregnant women living in houses close to power lines). It is worth noting that the NARDA SRM-3000 used in their study operates in the frequency range of 27MHz-3GHz and cannot measure extremely low frequency EMFs. It is also worth mentioning that previous studies conducted in Iran indicated that the exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields is probably related to early spontaneous abortions (17). Another shortcoming of this paper comes from ignoring the role of mobile phone/cordless phone use by pregnant women in evaluation of the risk of abortion. It should be noted that some studies conducted in Iran showed that the use of mobile phones can be linked to the early spontaneous abortions (18). We hope that our comments help better understanding of the effects of EMF on the pregnancy outcome. Dear Editor We are greatly thankful for the precious comments of the esteemed commentator, Dr. Mortazavi. Hereby, you can find my peer-to-peer response to his worthy comments: First comment: As it is clear, our research is focuses on exposed electromagnetic waves rather than fields. We know that in the case of ELF, according to low frequency of 50 Hz, any wave radiation is impossible from low length cables or other electromagnetic sources, and only electric and magnetic inductions effect the receptor, that are all totally out of the scope of this article. Hence, the ELF frequency range is not included in the study with intent, so the comment should crucially not be considered as shortcoming of the study. Second comment: It is obvious that the article focuses on downlink electromagnetic waves which are special types of electric field coupled with magnetic field radiating in the speed of light, which means electromagnetic waves down-coming from electromagnetic sources as the panel antennas installed on the cellphone towers, television broadcast towers, etc. to the human as subjects of susceptibility. In all measurements shown in the article, the downlink frequency range is set in Narda measuring instrument, not the uplink frequency ranges which are radiated from mobile phones or the other radiating devices used as accessories or laptop and so on mentioned at commentator's reference 18. As you know, so called uplink frequencies are the same for all samples studied, so can be rightly excluded from the study. Therefore the uplink frequency range is not set with intent.
  13 in total

1.  Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; J Ahmadi; M Shariati
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Human short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones decreases computer-assisted visual reaction time.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; M S Rouintan; S Taeb; N Dehghan; A A Ghaffarpanah; Z Sadeghi; F Ghafouri
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.396

3.  Non-linear adaptive phenomena which decrease the risk of infection after pre-exposure to radiofrequency radiation.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; M Motamedifar; G Namdari; M Taheri; A R Mortazavi; N Shokrpour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Alterations in TSH and Thyroid Hormones following Mobile Phone Use.

Authors:  Seyed Mortavazi; Asadollah Habib; Amir Ganj-Karami; Razieh Samimi-Doost; Atefe Pour-Abedi; Ali Babaie
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2009-10

5.  Exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion: a case-control study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shamsi Mahmoudabadi; Saeideh Ziaei; Mohammad Firoozabadi; Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
Journal:  J Res Health Sci       Date:  2013-09-17

6.  Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; E Daiee; A Yazdi; K Khiabani; A Kavousi; R Vazirinejad; B Behnejad; M Ghasemi; M Balali Mood
Journal:  Pak J Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-15

7.  Increased Radioresistance to Lethal Doses of Gamma Rays in Mice and Rats after Exposure to Microwave Radiation Emitted by a GSM Mobile Phone Simulator.

Authors:  Smj Mortazavi; Ma Mosleh-Shirazi; Ar Tavassoli; M Taheri; Ar Mehdizadeh; Sas Namazi; A Jamali; R Ghalandari; S Bonyadi; M Haghani; M Shafie
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Use of mobile phone during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shamsi Mahmoudabadi; Saeideh Ziaei; Mohammad Firoozabadi; Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2015-04-21

9.  Male reproductive health under threat: Short term exposure to radiofrequency radiations emitted by common mobile jammers.

Authors:  Smj Mortazavi; Me Parsanezhad; M Kazempour; P Ghahramani; Ar Mortazavi; M Davari
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-04

10.  High-field MRI and mercury release from dental amalgam fillings.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; M Neghab; S M H Anoosheh; N Bahaeddini; G Mortazavi; P Neghab; A Rajaeifard
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.