Literature DB >> 28462011

Comparison of Two Detailed Models of Aedes aegypti Population Dynamics.

Mathieu Legros1,2, Marcelo Otero3, Victoria Romeo Aznar3, Hernan Solari3, Fred Gould1,4, Alun L Lloyd4,5.   

Abstract

The success of control programs for mosquito borne diseases can be enhanced by crucial information provided by models of the mosquito populations. Models, however, can differ in their structure, complexity and biological assumptions, and these differences impact their predictions. Unfortunately, it is typically difficult to determine why two complex models make different predictions because we lack structured side-by-side comparisons of models using comparable parameterization. Here we present a detailed comparison of two complex, spatially-explicit, stochastic models of the population dynamics of Aedes aegypti, the main vector of dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya and Zika viruses. Both models describe the mosquito's biological and ecological characteristics, but differ in complexity and specific assumptions. We compare the predictions of these models in two selected climatic settings, a tropical and weakly seasonal climate in Iquitos, Peru, and a temperate and strongly seasonal climate in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Both models were calibrated to operate at identical average densities in unperturbed conditions in both settings, by adjusting parameters regulating densities in each model (number of larval development sites and amount of nutritional resources). We show that the models differ in their sensitivity to environmental conditions (temperature and rainfall), and trace differences to specific model assumptions. Temporal dynamics of the Ae. aegypti populations predicted by the two models differ more markedly under strongly seasonal Buenos Aires conditions. We use both models to simulate killing of larvae and/or adults with insecticides in selected areas. We show that predictions of population recovery by the models differ substantially, an effect likely related to model assumptions regarding larval development and (direct or delayed) density dependence. Our methodical comparison provides important guidance for model improvement by identifying key areas of Ae. aegypti ecology that substantially affect model predictions, and revealing the impact of model assumptions on population dynamics predictions in unperturbed and perturbed conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aedes aegypti; model comparison; mosquito-borne diseases; population dynamics; spatial model; vector control

Year:  2016        PMID: 28462011      PMCID: PMC5409521          DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecosphere            Impact factor:   3.171


  31 in total

1.  Efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in children in Latin America.

Authors:  Luis Villar; Gustavo Horacio Dayan; José Luis Arredondo-García; Doris Maribel Rivera; Rivaldo Cunha; Carmen Deseda; Humberto Reynales; Maria Selma Costa; Javier Osvaldo Morales-Ramírez; Gabriel Carrasquilla; Luis Carlos Rey; Reynaldo Dietze; Kleber Luz; Enrique Rivas; Maria Consuelo Miranda Montoya; Margarita Cortés Supelano; Betzana Zambrano; Edith Langevin; Mark Boaz; Nadia Tornieporth; Melanie Saville; Fernando Noriega
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A stochastic population dynamics model for Aedes aegypti: formulation and application to a city with temperate climate.

Authors:  Marcelo Otero; Hernán G Solari; Nicolás Schweigmann
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  A model for the development of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti as a function of the available food.

Authors:  Victoria Romeo Aznar; María Sol De Majo; Sylvia Fischer; Diego Francisco; Mario A Natiello; Hernán G Solari
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Dynamic life table model for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): analysis of the literature and model development.

Authors:  D A Focks; D G Haile; E Daniels; G A Mount
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Protective efficacy of the recombinant, live-attenuated, CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren: a randomised, controlled phase 2b trial.

Authors:  Arunee Sabchareon; Derek Wallace; Chukiat Sirivichayakul; Kriengsak Limkittikul; Pornthep Chanthavanich; Saravudh Suvannadabba; Vithaya Jiwariyavej; Wut Dulyachai; Krisana Pengsaa; T Anh Wartel; Annick Moureau; Melanie Saville; Alain Bouckenooghe; Simonetta Viviani; Nadia G Tornieporth; Jean Lang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Temporal and geographic patterns of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) production in Iquitos, Peru.

Authors:  Amy C Morrison; Kenneth Gray; Arthur Getis; Helvio Astete; Moises Sihuincha; Dana Focks; Douglas Watts; Jeffrey D Stancil; James G Olson; Patrick Blair; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Systems analysis of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  M E Gilpin; G A McClelland
Journal:  Fortschr Zool       Date:  1979

8.  Understanding uncertainties in model-based predictions of Aedes aegypti population dynamics.

Authors:  Chonggang Xu; Mathieu Legros; Fred Gould; Alun L Lloyd
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-09-28

9.  Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of a Dengue Vaccine in Regions of Endemic Disease.

Authors:  Sri Rezeki Hadinegoro; Jose Luis Arredondo-García; Maria Rosario Capeding; Carmen Deseda; Tawee Chotpitayasunondh; Reynaldo Dietze; H I Hj Muhammad Ismail; Humberto Reynales; Kriengsak Limkittikul; Doris Maribel Rivera-Medina; Huu Ngoc Tran; Alain Bouckenooghe; Danaya Chansinghakul; Margarita Cortés; Karen Fanouillere; Remi Forrat; Carina Frago; Sophia Gailhardou; Nicholas Jackson; Fernando Noriega; Eric Plennevaux; T Anh Wartel; Betzana Zambrano; Melanie Saville
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Skeeter Buster: a stochastic, spatially explicit modeling tool for studying Aedes aegypti population replacement and population suppression strategies.

Authors:  Krisztian Magori; Mathieu Legros; Molly E Puente; Dana A Focks; Thomas W Scott; Alun L Lloyd; Fred Gould
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2009-09-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Local and regional dynamics of chikungunya virus transmission in Colombia: the role of mismatched spatial heterogeneity.

Authors:  Sean M Moore; Quirine A Ten Bosch; Amir S Siraj; K James Soda; Guido España; Alfonso Campo; Sara Gómez; Daniela Salas; Benoit Raybaud; Edward Wenger; Philip Welkhoff; T Alex Perkins
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Construction sites in Miami-Dade County, Florida are highly favorable environments for vector mosquitoes.

Authors:  André B B Wilke; Chalmers Vasquez; William Petrie; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; John C Beier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Differential Hatching, Development, Oviposition, and Longevity Patterns among Colombian Aedes aegypti Populations.

Authors:  Andrea Arévalo-Cortés; Yurany Granada; David Torres; Omar Triana-Chavez
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.139

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.