Literature DB >> 28461637

Dental Students' Perceptions of Digital Assessment Software for Preclinical Tooth Preparation Exercises.

Carly F Park1, Justin M Sheinbaum1, Yasushi Tamada1, Raina Chandiramani1, Lisa Lian1, Cliff Lee1, John Da Silva1, Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai2.   

Abstract

Objective self-assessment is essential to learning and continued competence in dentistry. A computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) learning software (prepCheck, Sirona) allows students to objectively assess their performance in preclinical prosthodontics. The aim of this study was to evaluate students' perceptions of CAD/CAM learning software for preclinical prosthodontics exercises. In 2014, all third-year dental students at Harvard School of Dental Medicine (n=36) were individually instructed by a trained faculty member in using prepCheck. Each student completed a preclinical formative exercise (#18) and summative examination (#30) for ceramometal crown preparation and evaluated the preparation using five assessment tools (reduction, margin width, surface finish, taper, and undercut) in prepCheck. The students then rated each of the five tools for usefulness, user-friendliness, and frequency of use on a scale from 1=lowest to 5=highest. Faculty members graded the tooth preparations as pass (P), marginal-pass (MP), or fail (F). The survey response rate was 100%. The tools for undercut and taper had the highest scores for usefulness, user-friendliness, and frequency of use. The reduction tool score was significantly lower in all categories (p<0.01). There were significant differences in usefulness (p<0.05) and user-friendliness (p<0.05) scores among the P, MP, and F groups. These results suggest that the prepCheck taper and undercut tools were useful for the students' learning process in a preclinical exercise. The students' perceptions of prepCheck and their preclinical performance were related, and those students who performed poorest rated the software as significantly more useful.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; computer-assisted instruction; dental education; educational measurement; educational technology; prosthodontics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28461637     DOI: 10.21815/JDE.016.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  5 in total

Review 1.  Personalized workflows in reconstructive dentistry-current possibilities and future opportunities.

Authors:  Tim Joda; Nicola U Zitzmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Students' and lecturers' perspective on the implementation of online learning in dental education due to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz; Alexander Schmidt; Bernd Wöstmann; Nobert Krämer; Nelly Schulz-Weidner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Perspectives from Dentists, Dental Assistants, Students, and Patients on Dental Care Adapted to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz; Alexander Schmidt; Bernd Wöstmann; Andreas May; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Dennis Albert; Doreen Ziedorn; Norbert Krämer; Nelly Schulz-Weidner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Digital Undergraduate Education in Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nicola U Zitzmann; Lea Matthisson; Harald Ohla; Tim Joda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Comparison of Digital Self-Assessment Systems and Faculty Feedback for Tooth Preparation in a Preclinical Simulation.

Authors:  Milan Stoilov; Lea Trebess; Markus Klemmer; Helmut Stark; Norbert Enkling; Dominik Kraus
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.