Literature DB >> 28461037

Post-marketing drug withdrawals: Pharmacovigilance success, regulatory problems.

Jeffrey K Aronson1.   

Abstract

Modern pharmacovigilance began in the 1960s, since when the subject has grown markedly, interest having particularly increased since 2010. One index of its success is the increasing speed with which serious adverse drug reactions are discovered after marketing of a medicinal product. However, the speed with which products have subsequently been withdrawn as a result of the discovery of serious adverse reactions has not consistently changed. This highlights problems that regulators and manufacturers face when serious reactions are discovered, with difficulties in deciding which of several consequent actions to take: to add specific warnings (cautions) or contraindications to the product label; to issue a Direct Healthcare Professional Communication; to allow informed patients to decide whether they will take the drug; or, in the most serious cases, to withdraw the product or revoke the licence. Conflicts of interest may inhibit decision-making. Recommendations that arise from these observations are that: health professionals and patients should be more vigorously encouraged to report suspected adverse drug reactions; regulatory authorities and drug manufacturers should take quicker confirmatory action when serious suspected adverse drug reactions are reported, even anecdotally, with formal studies to test for causality conducted sooner rather than later, applying lower than usual thresholds for suspicion; temporary suspensions or restrictions could be considered during such assessments; universal guidelines are needed for determining when a drug should be withdrawn if serious adverse drug reactions are suspected; there should be more rigorous monitoring and verification of deaths and reporting of reasons for drop-outs during clinical trials, with more transparency in reporting adverse events and ready access to premarketing clinical study reports; post-marketing drug monitoring systems and medicines regulation in low-to-middle income economies, especially in Africa, where withdrawals are fewer than elsewhere, should be strengthened.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse drug reactions; Arrêts des médicaments basés sur la sécurité; Effets indésirables médicamenteux; Pharmacovigilance; Post-autorisation; Post-marketing; Product surveillance; Regulation; Règlement; Safety-based drug withdrawal; Surveillance des produits

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28461037     DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2017.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therapie        ISSN: 0040-5957            Impact factor:   2.070


  3 in total

1.  A comparison of new drugs approved by the FDA, the EMA, and Swissmedic: an assessment of the international harmonization of drugs.

Authors:  Minette-Joëlle Zeukeng; Enrique Seoane-Vazquez; Pascal Bonnabry
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Safety-Related Drug Withdrawals in China Between 1999 and 2021: A Systematic Investigation and Analysis.

Authors:  Yanrong Li; Yang Jiang; Haixue Wang; Li Zhang; Yue Yang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.228

3.  Investigation assessing the publicly available evidence supporting postmarketing withdrawals, revocations and suspensions of marketing authorisations in the EU since 2012.

Authors:  Samantha Lane; Elizabeth Lynn; Saad Shakir
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.