Literature DB >> 28460994

Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy: Analysis of a Nationwide Insurance Claims Database.

Meera R Chappidi1, Max Kates2, Nikolai A Sopko2, Gregory A Joice2, Jeffrey J Tosoian2, Phillip M Pierorazio2, Trinity J Bivalacqua2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To improve care for patients after radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP), focus on survivorship issues such as sexual function needs to increase. Previous studies have demonstrated the burden of erectile dysfunction (ED) after RCP to be as high as 89%. AIM: To determine the rates of ED treatment use (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, injectable therapies, urethral suppositories, vacuum erection devices, and penile prosthetics) in patients with bladder cancer before and after RCP to better understand current patterns of care.
METHODS: Men with bladder cancer undergoing RCP were identified in the MarketScan database (2010-2014). ED treatment use was assessed at baseline (during the 1 year before RCP) and at 6-month intervals (0-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-24 months) after RCP. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of ED treatment use at 6-month intervals after RCP. OUTCOMES: ED treatment rates and predictors of ED treatment at 0-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-24 month follow-up after RCP.
RESULTS: At baseline, 6.5% of patients (77 of 1,176) used ED treatments. The rates of ED treatment use at 0 to 6, 7 to 12, 13 to 18, and 19 to 24 months after RCP were 15.2%, 12.7%, 8.1%, and 10.1% respectively. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors were the most commonly used treatment at all time points. In the multivariable model, predictors of ED treatment use at 0 to 6 months after RCP were age younger than 50 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.68-6.01), baseline ED treatment use (OR = 5.75, 95% CI = 3.08-10.72), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.13-2.61), and neobladder diversion (OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.56-3.70). Baseline ED treatment use continued to be associated with ED treatment use at 6 to 12 months (OR = 5.63, 95% CI = 2.42-13.10) and 13 to 18 months (OR = 8.99, 95% CI = 3.05-26.51) after RCP. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: While the burden of ED following RCP is known to be high, overall ED treatment rates are low. These findings suggest either ED treatment is low priority for RCP patients or education about potential ED therapies may not be commonly discussed with patients following RCP. Urologists should consider discussing sexual function more frequently with their RCP patients. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the use of a national claims database, which allows for longitudinal follow-up and detailed information on prescription medications and devices. Limitations include the lack of pathologic and oncologic outcomes data.
CONCLUSION: ED treatment use after RCP is quite low. The strongest predictor of ED treatment use after RCP was baseline treatment use. These findings suggest ED treatment is a low priority for patients with RCP or education about potential ED therapies might not be commonly discussed with patients after RCP. Urologists should consider discussing sexual function more frequently with their patients undergoing RCP. Chappadi MR, Kates M, Sopko NA, et al. Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy: Analysis of a Nationwide Insurance Claims Database. J Sex Med 2017;14:810-817.
Copyright © 2017 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder Cancer; Cystectomy; Erectile Dysfunction; Pharmacotherapy; Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors; Quality Of Life

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28460994     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  4 in total

Review 1.  Penile Implant Considerations in the Bladder Cancer Survivor.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Loh-Doyle
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Cognitive function, depression, and anxiety in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with and without adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Piotr Jarzemski; Bartosz Brzoszczyk; Alicja Popiołek; Agnieszka Stachowicz-Karpińska; Szymon Gołota; Maciej Bieliński; Alina Borkowska
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Robotic radical cystectomy with concomitant implantation of 3-piece penile prosthesis: a one-step solution.

Authors:  Alessandro Izzo; Giuseppe Quarto; Giovanni Grimaldi; Luigi Castaldo; Raffaele Muscariello; Dario Franzese; Paola Del Prete; Matteo Ferro; Daniela Barberio; Ida Bolognini; Attilio Antonio Montano Bianchi; Riccardo Autorino; Sisto Perdonà
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2021-06-15

4.  Designing a Pragmatic Intervention to Help Improve the Bladder Cancer Patient Experience.

Authors:  Agustina Bessa; Cecilia Bosco; Fidelma Cahill; Beth Russell; Louis Fox; Charlotte Moss; Harriet Wylie; Anna Haire; Saran Green; Deborah Enting; Shamim Khan; Rajesh Nair; Ramesh Thurairaja; Kathryn Chatterton; Suzanne Amery; Nicola Peat; Sue Smith; Stuart Spear; Richard T Bryan; Leila Frodsham; Danny Burke; Jeannie Rigby; Lydia Makaroff; Phil Kelly; Melanie Costin; Christel Häggström; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.