Literature DB >> 28460783

Thrombolytic therapy in submassive pulmonary embolism.

Eda Özlek1, Bülent Özlek2, Funda Sungur Biteker3, Murat Biteker1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28460783      PMCID: PMC5414962          DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Heart J        ISSN: 0019-4832


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor We have greatly enjoyed reading the recently published article by Nagamalesh et al.. The authors examined the data of 31 consecutive patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) in a single center observational study and concluded that thrombolytic therapy can be considered for patients with both massive and submassive pulmonary thromboembolism. However, we have some concerns; The authors defined massive PE as sustained hypotension with SBP <90 mmHg for at least 15 min or requiring inotropic support were considered as massive PE, which consists of 26% (n = 8) of patients. However, in the results section they have written that 52% (n = 16) of the subjects presented with shock at admission or within 48 h following admission. It is not clear how many patients presented with massive PE; 8 or 16? The authors concluded that thrombolytic therapy can be considered for patients with both massive and submassive PE, However, the value of thrombolysis in acute submassive PE remains controversial in the current studies.2, 3 In a recent article, Desai and colleagues evaluated 3253 PE patients with hemodynamically stable right-sided heart failure. There was no significant difference in mortality between hemodynamically stable PE patients with right ventricular dysfunction who received thrombolytic agents compared with those who did not. In another single-center, prospective, randomized study of 86 patients with submassive PE, patients were divided into two groups: group I patients received thrombolysis (single bolus of tenecteplase) with unfractionated heparin and group II patients received placebo with unfractionated heparin. In this study, Sinha et al. found that patients with acute submassive PE do not derive overall mortality benefit, recurrent PE and rehospitalization with thrombolytic therapy. Therefore, we think that observational studies cannot be used as reliable sources to make statements of fact about the safety, efficacy, or effectiveness of a practice.
  2 in total

1.  Pulmonary Embolism with Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Who Should Receive Thrombolytic Agents?

Authors:  Hem Desai; Bhupinder Natt; Christian Bime; Joshua Dill; James E Dalen; Joseph S Alpert
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Sinha; Mohit Sachan; Amit Goel; Karandeep Singh; Vikas Mishra; Mukesh Jitendra Jha; Ashutosh Kumar; Nasar Abdali; Mohammad Asif; Mahamdula Razi; Umeshwar Pandey; Ramesh Thakur; Chandra Mohan Varma; Vinay Krishna
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-12-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.