Richard M Martin1, Michael S Kramer2, Rita Patel3, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman4, Jennifer Thompson4, Seungmi Yang2, Konstantin Vilchuck5, Natalia Bogdanovich5, Mikhail Hameza5, Kate Tilling3, Emily Oken4. 1. School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom2University Hospitals Bristol National Health Services Foundation Trust National Institute for Health Research Bristol Nutrition Biomedical Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom3Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. 2. Departments of Pediatrics and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. National Research and Applied Medicine Mother and Child Centre, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.
Abstract
Importance: Evidence that breastfeeding reduces child obesity risk and lowers blood pressure (BP) is based on potentially confounded observational studies. Objective: To investigate the effects of a breastfeeding promotion intervention on adiposity and BP at age 16 years and on longitudinal growth trajectories from birth. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster-randomized Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial. Belarusian maternity hospitals and affiliated polyclinics (the clusters) were allocated into intervention (n = 16) or control arms (n = 15) in 1996 and 1997. The trial participants were 17 046 breastfeeding mother-infant pairs; of these, 13 557 children (79.5%) were followed up at 16 years of age between September 2012 and July 2015. Interventions: Breastfeeding promotion, modeled on the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Main Outcomes and Measures: Body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); fat and fat-free mass indices and percentage of body fat from bioimpedance; waist circumference; overweight and obesity; height; BP; and longitudinal growth trajectories. The primary analysis was modified intention-to-treat (without imputation for losses to follow-up) accounting for within-clinic clustering. Results: We examined 13 557 children at a median age of 16.2 years (48.5% were girls). The intervention substantially increased breastfeeding duration and exclusivity compared with the control arm (exclusively breastfed: 45% vs 6% at 3 months, respectively). Mean differences at 16 years between intervention and control groups were 0.21 (95% CI, 0.06-0.36) for BMI; 0.21 kg/m2 (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.44) for fat mass index; 0.00 kg/m2 (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.22) for fat-free mass index; 0.71% (95% CI, -0.32 to 1.74) for percentage body fat; -0.73 cm (-2.48 to 1.02) for waist circumference; 0.05 cm (95% CI, -0.85 to 0.94) for height; -0.54 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.40 to 1.31) for systolic BP; and 0.71 mm Hg (95% CI, -0.68 to 2.10) for diastolic BP. The odds ratio for overweight/obesity (BMI ≥85th percentile vs <85th percentile) was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.02-1.28) and the odds ratio for obesity (BMI ≥95th percentile vs <95th percentile) was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.92-1.29). The intervention resulted in a more rapid rate of gain in postinfancy height (1 to 2.8 years), weight (2.8 to 14.5 years), and BMI (2.8 to 8.5 years) compared with the control arm. The intervention had little effect on BMI z score changes after 8.5 years. Conclusions and Relevance: A randomized intervention that increased the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding was not associated with lowered adolescent obesity risk or BP. On the contrary, the prevalence of overweight/obesity was higher in the intervention arm. All mothers initiated breastfeeding, so findings may not apply to comparisons of the effects of breastfeeding vs formula feeding. Trial Registration: isrctn.org: ISRCTN37687716; and clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01561612.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Evidence that breastfeeding reduces childobesity risk and lowers blood pressure (BP) is based on potentially confounded observational studies. Objective: To investigate the effects of a breastfeeding promotion intervention on adiposity and BP at age 16 years and on longitudinal growth trajectories from birth. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster-randomized Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial. Belarusian maternity hospitals and affiliated polyclinics (the clusters) were allocated into intervention (n = 16) or control arms (n = 15) in 1996 and 1997. The trial participants were 17 046 breastfeeding mother-infant pairs; of these, 13 557 children (79.5%) were followed up at 16 years of age between September 2012 and July 2015. Interventions: Breastfeeding promotion, modeled on the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Main Outcomes and Measures: Body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); fat and fat-free mass indices and percentage of body fat from bioimpedance; waist circumference; overweight and obesity; height; BP; and longitudinal growth trajectories. The primary analysis was modified intention-to-treat (without imputation for losses to follow-up) accounting for within-clinic clustering. Results: We examined 13 557 children at a median age of 16.2 years (48.5% were girls). The intervention substantially increased breastfeeding duration and exclusivity compared with the control arm (exclusively breastfed: 45% vs 6% at 3 months, respectively). Mean differences at 16 years between intervention and control groups were 0.21 (95% CI, 0.06-0.36) for BMI; 0.21 kg/m2 (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.44) for fat mass index; 0.00 kg/m2 (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.22) for fat-free mass index; 0.71% (95% CI, -0.32 to 1.74) for percentage body fat; -0.73 cm (-2.48 to 1.02) for waist circumference; 0.05 cm (95% CI, -0.85 to 0.94) for height; -0.54 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.40 to 1.31) for systolic BP; and 0.71 mm Hg (95% CI, -0.68 to 2.10) for diastolic BP. The odds ratio for overweight/obesity (BMI ≥85th percentile vs <85th percentile) was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.02-1.28) and the odds ratio for obesity (BMI ≥95th percentile vs <95th percentile) was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.92-1.29). The intervention resulted in a more rapid rate of gain in postinfancy height (1 to 2.8 years), weight (2.8 to 14.5 years), and BMI (2.8 to 8.5 years) compared with the control arm. The intervention had little effect on BMI z score changes after 8.5 years. Conclusions and Relevance: A randomized intervention that increased the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding was not associated with lowered adolescent obesity risk or BP. On the contrary, the prevalence of overweight/obesity was higher in the intervention arm. All mothers initiated breastfeeding, so findings may not apply to comparisons of the effects of breastfeeding vs formula feeding. Trial Registration: isrctn.org: ISRCTN37687716; and clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01561612.
Authors: Jeremy A Rassen; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Murray A Mittleman; M Alan Brookhart Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M W Gillman; S L Rifas-Shiman; C A Camargo; C S Berkey; A L Frazier; H R Rockett; A E Field; G A Colditz Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-05-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Caroline Hd Fall; Judith B Borja; Clive Osmond; Linda Richter; Santosh K Bhargava; Reynaldo Martorell; Aryeh D Stein; Fernando C Barros; Cesar G Victora Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Lauren B Guthrie; Emily Oken; Jonathan A C Sterne; Matthew W Gillman; Rita Patel; Konstantin Vilchuck; Natalia Bogdanovich; Michael S Kramer; Richard M Martin Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Lesley Fairley; Emily S Petherick; Laura D Howe; Kate Tilling; Noel Cameron; Debbie A Lawlor; Jane West; John Wright Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2013-02-16 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Emma L Anderson; Abigail Fraser; Richard M Martin; Michael S Kramer; Emily Oken; Rita Patel; Kate Tilling Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2013-02-03 Impact factor: 6.377
Authors: Xun Zhang; Kate Tilling; Richard M Martin; Emily Oken; Ashley I Naimi; Izzuddin M Aris; Seungmi Yang; Michael S Kramer Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Izzuddin M Aris; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Xun Zhang; Seungmi Yang; Karen Switkowski; Abby F Fleisch; Marie-France Hivert; Richard M Martin; Michael S Kramer; Emily Oken Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Zheng Liu; Martha Neuringer; John W Erdman; Matthew J Kuchan; Lauren Renner; Emily E Johnson; Xiaojie Wang; Christopher D Kroenke Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Elvira Isganaitis; Sarah Venditti; Tucker J Matthews; Carles Lerin; Ellen W Demerath; David A Fields Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 7.045