| Literature DB >> 28459839 |
Ralf Werner1, Isabel Mönig1, Ralf Lünstedt1, Lutz Wünsch2, Christoph Thorns3, Benedikt Reiz4, Alexandra Krause5, Karl Otfried Schwab5, Gerhard Binder6, Paul-Martin Holterhus7, Olaf Hiort1.
Abstract
Mutations in NR5A1 have been reported as a frequent cause of 46,XY disorders of sex development (DSD) associated to a broad phenotypic spectrum ranging from infertility, ambiguous genitalia, anorchia to gonadal dygenesis and female genitalia. Here we present the clinical follow up of four 46,XY DSD patients with three novel heterozygous mutations in the NR5A1 gene leading to a p.T40P missense mutation and a p.18DKVSG22del nonframeshift deletion in the DNA-binding domain and a familiar p.Y211Tfs*83 frameshift mutation. Functional analysis of the missense and nonframeshift mutation revealed a deleterious character with loss of DNA-binding and transactivation capacity. Both, the mutations in the DNA-binding domain, as well as the familiar frameshift mutation are associated with highly variable endocrine values and phenotypic appearance. Phenotypes vary from males with spontaneous puberty, substantial testosterone production and possible fertility to females with and without Müllerian structures and primary amenorrhea. Exome sequencing of the sibling's family revealed TBX2 as a possible modifier of gonadal development in patients with NR5A1 mutations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28459839 PMCID: PMC5411087 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Hormonal and clinical data of patients.
| Age (years; months) | Clinical presentation | T (ng/dL) | FSH (IU/L) | LH (IU/L) | ACTH (pg/mL) | Cortisol ng/mL | Other investigations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ambigous genitalia, phallus 1.3 cm, small vagina | 3.9 | 54 (ref: <60) | 26, ACTH test: Basal: 8.2, Stimulated: 54.3 | ||||
| 10;7 | Testicular volume 3–4 cc, Tanner stage G2 | 82.6, after hCG stimulation: 242 | 8.8 | 1.03 | Inhibin B: 19 ng/L | ||
| 11;3 | 135.8 | 2.27 | Inhibin B <10 ng/L | ||||
| 11;11 | 162 | 5.2 | |||||
| 15;8 | Genital appearance: Tanner stage G4/ PH6, testes volume 4–6 cc | 508 (under suppl. with 37.5 mg testosterone gel) | 7.6 | 39.2 | 154 | Height: 180.5 cm weight: 64.3 kg | |
| 16;7 | 9.4 | ACTH test: Basal: 182, Stimulated: 319 | |||||
| 17;3 | Inhibin B 11 ng/L | ||||||
| 18;2 | 383 without testosterone supplementation | TESE | |||||
| Ambigous genitalia, rugated labioscrotal folds, partial labioscrotal fusion, phallus 1.3 cm, hypospadias, short urogenital sinus | < 1 (ref: 2.8–362.9). After hCG stimulation: 8 | 7.4 | <0.5 | ACTH test; Basal: 11 (ref: 9.24–86.8). Stimulated: 187 (ref: 54–718) | hCG stimulation: basal: androstenedione | ||
| 8.4 | Inguinal hernia | ||||||
| Bipartite scrotum, phallus 2 cm with chordae, hypospadias scrotalis, testes descended | 187 | ||||||
| 0;3.5 | hCG test: Basal: 232, Stimulated: 735 | 3.7 | 2.6 | Inhibin B: 144 ng/L hCG test: DHT basal:80 ng/dL, stimulated: 469 ng/dL | |||
| 12 | Short penis, testes volume 4/2 cc | 119 | 9 | 2.4 | Inhibin B: 36.2 ng/L | ||
| 14;7 | Pubertal stage Tanner PH4/G4, testicular volume: 6/8 cc | 297 | 3.4 | 69.4 | 170 | ||
| 16 | 344 | 7.5 | 45.9 | 96 | Inhibin B: 15 ng/L | ||
| Primary amenorrhea, small uterus of prepubertal size, pubertal stage Tanner PH1/B1, small dysgenetic gonads with rudimentary testicular tissue, gonadectomy and estradiol supplementation | 25.16 | 38.5 | Inhibin B:<10 ng/L | ||||
| 15;10 | Pubertal development Tanner B4, uterus 4 cm, no menarche | Estradiol 28.5 ng/L (under supplementation) |
Endocrine values outside the reference ranges are given in bold. T = testosterone
Fig 1Electropherogram of NR5A1 mutations.
Electropherogram of the heterozygous c.118A>C mutation in patient 1 (A), the nonframeshift deletion c.51_65delGGACAAGGTGTCCGG in patient 2 (B), the frame-shift deletion c.630_636delGTACGGC in patient 3 (C) and the pedigree of the family of patient 3 and 4 (D). Circles denote phenotypic females, squares denote phenotypic males. Filled squares and circles correspond to a DSD condition, dots to a carrier status.
Fig 2Schematic view of NR5A1.
Scheme of the DNA-binding domain containing the zinc finger domain (ZnF) and the Ftz-F1 box, the hinge region (HR) and the ligand binding domain (LBD) with activation function 2 (AF2) of NR5A1. Positions of the mutation p.T40P, p.D18_G22del and amino acid Y211 are indicated.
Fig 3Transactivation of the human AMH- and STAR-promoter.
The transactivation capacity of mutant NR5A1-T40P and NR5A1-18DKVSG22del were compared to wt-NR5A1 using human AMH- (A) and STAR-promoter (B) containing reporter genes. The empty pCMV-Myc vector represents background activity. Wild type (WT) activity was set 100%. RLU = relative luciferase activity. Error bars represent standard deviations, ***P = <0.001, t-test comparison of WT and mutant. C: Immunoblot detection of myc-tagged NR5A1 proteins. Equal loadings were verified by detection of total proteins using the TGX Stain Free system (BioRad). D: statistical analysis of 3 western blots of three different experiments showing an approximately equal protein accumulation of NR5A1-WT and mutant 18DKVSG22del, while mutant T40P showed an 2–3 fold enhanced accumulation. Images were quantified and normalized to total protein using Image Lab 5.2.1 (BioRad).
Fig 4Electrophoretic mobility shift assay of NR5A1 mutants.
A) DNA-binding capability of mutant NR5A1-T40P and NR5A1-18DKVSG22del were compared to wt-NR5A1 using a SF-1 responsive element of the mouse Amh promoter. Nuclear extracts containing WT-SF1 shifted the labelled probe (arrow). A 200 fold excess of unlabelled competitor abolished the shifted signal, while a 200 fold excess of unlabelled mutated competitor rescues the shifted signal. Both mutant proteins have lost their DNA-binding capability. B) Aliquots of the nuclear extracts used in EMSA were separated by SDS gel electrophoresis, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and stained with Ponceau S and anti-myc antibodies to verify equal SF-1 protein concentrations.