| Literature DB >> 28458715 |
Dan Yu1, Guang Yu An1.
Abstract
Objective. To investigate the therapeutic effects of Xihuang pill combined with chemotherapy on advanced colorectal cancer. Methods. Sixty-three patients with advanced colorectal cancer were divided into an experimental group (n = 32) and control group (n = 31). Patients in the experimental group were treated with traditional Chinese medicine combined with Western medicine (i.e., Xihuang pill with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy), and those in the control group were treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy alone. Changes in therapeutic efficacy, side effects, blood coagulation function, and quality of life (QOL) were compared between the two groups. Results. The response rate was higher in the experimental than control group (P = 0.011). The QOL score in the experimental group was significantly lower after treatment than before treatment (P = 0.003), while no significant change was found in the control group. In the experimental group, the posttreatment activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time after treatment were 30.05 ± 3.85 and 10.40 ± 1.25 s, respectively, which were prolonged compared with those before treatment (29.12 ± 4.03 and 9.85 ± 1.00 s; P = 0.010 and 0.021, respectively). Conclusion. In patients with advanced colorectal cancer, Xihuang pill combined with chemotherapy can significantly enhance the therapeutic effects compared with chemotherapy alone and improve patients' QOL and hypercoagulability.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28458715 PMCID: PMC5387817 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5936086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
General situation.
| Experimental group | Control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.712 | ||
| Male | 18 (52.9) | 16 (47.1) | |
| Female | 14 (48.3) | 15 (51.7) | |
| Age (year) | 58.13 ± 10.50 | 58.45 ± 10.01 | 0.900 |
| ECOG | 1.09 ± 0.73 | 1.06 ± 0.77 | 0.878 |
Performance status by ECOG score standard (ZPS, 5 points).
| Grade | Performance status |
|---|---|
| 0 | Fully active, able to carry on all predisease performance without restriction |
| 1 | Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, for example, light house work, office work |
| 2 | Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up to and about more than 50% of waking hours |
| 3 | Capable of only limited self-care; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours |
| 4 | Cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair |
| 5 | Dead |
Comparison of response rates.
| Group | PR | SD | PD | RR (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 15 | 9 | 8 | 46.88 | 0.011 |
| Control group | 7 | 13 | 11 | 22.58 |
Comparison of CEA.
| Groups |
| Pretreatment; ng/ml | Posttreatment; ng/ml |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 32 | 66.5 (27.3, 462.5) | 25.0 (15.5, 117.5) | 0.000 |
| Control group | 31 | 68.0 (25.0, 523.0) | 59.0 (32.0, 410.0) | 0.074 |
|
| 0.837 | 0.033 |
Side effects (n = 63).
| Group | Bone marrow suppression | Gastrointestinal reaction | Abnormal liver function | Abnormal renal function |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 20 | 28 | 8 | 0 |
| Control group | 19 | 29 | 8 | 0 |
|
| 0.674 | 1.000 | 0.941 | — |
Coagulation function before treatment (n = 63).
| Group | APTT (seconds) | PT (seconds) | D-dimer (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 29.12 ± 4.03 | 9.85 ± 1.00 | 1.26 ± 0.83 |
| Control group | 28.86 ± 3.93 | 9.61 ± 0.95 | 1.42 ± 1.39 |
|
| 0.798 | 0.340 | 0.578 |
Changes of coagulation function before and after treatment (n = 63).
| Group | APTT (seconds) | PT (seconds) | D-dimer (mg/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Before treatment | 29.12 ± 4.03 | 9.85 ± 1.00 | 1.26 ± 0.83 |
| After treatment | 30.05 ± 3.85 | 10.40 ± 1.25 | 0.85 ± 0.44 | |
|
| 0.010 | 0.021 | 0.010 | |
| Control group | Before treatment | 28.86 ± 3.93 | 9.61 ± 0.95 | 1.42 ± 1.39 |
| After treatment | 29.09 ± 3.71 | 9.75 ± 0.92 | 1.37 ± 1.20 | |
|
| 0.053 | 0.155 | 0.625 |
Changes of ECOG (n = 63).
| Group | Time | ECOG |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Before treatment | 1.09 ± 0.73 | |
| After treatment | 0.75 ± 0.57 | 0.003 | |
| Control group | Before treatment | 1.06 ± 0.77 | |
| After treatment | 1.16 ± 0.93 | 0.5 |
Evaluation criteria of chemotherapy for solid tumors.
| Response assessment | Evaluation criteria |
|---|---|
| CR | All target lesions have disappeared during the course of treatment and the pathological lymph nodes are reduced to <10 mm |
| PR | Decreases of at least 30% from base line have been noted in the sum of LD of target lesions |
| PD | There has been an increase of at least 20% in the sum of the LD of targeted lesions, and it is emphasized that the absolute value of the increased sum of LD is 5 mm, or new lesions appeared |
| SD | Between PD and PR |