Literature DB >> 28458699

Pentoxifylline and prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: Is it efficient in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty?

Ali Eshraghi1, Roya Naranji-Sani2, Hourak Pourzand3, Mohammad Vojdanparast4, Negar Morovatfar5, Javad Ramezani1, Ramin Khamene-Bagheri1, Pouya Nezafati6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a major concern following procedures with applying iodinated contrast media. The basis prevention of CIN is hydration and to avoid hypovolemia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline (PTX) for the prevention of CIN in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing coronary angioplasty.
METHODS: This prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial study was performed on 175 (127 men) of MI patients undergoing routine treatment. Patients were assigned randomly to the control (n = 84) and study groups (n = 91). In our study group, patients received 400 mg/3 times a day from 24 hours before to 24 hours after coronary angiography. In addition, before the procedure and after 48 hours from the procedure, serum creatinine was measured.
RESULTS: CIN occurred in 14 patients (8.0%); 8 controls (9.5%) and 6 patients (6.6%) in the PTX group )P = 0.475) showing PTX to have no significant effect on CIN [P = 0.750, odds ratio = 0.82 (confidence interval = 0.24-2.8)] though a significantly different volume of contrast was used between the groups (231.29 ± 105.10 mm3 and 190.88 ± 75.82 mm3; P = 0.005, respectively).
CONCLUSION: There was no significantly different occurrence of CIN on patients with MI, undergoing coronary angioplasty, but its relatively lower rate in PTX group would recommend the prophylactic oral use of PTX for CIN prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angioplasty; Contrast Media; Creatinine; Myocardial Infarction; Nephropathy; Pentoxifylline

Year:  2016        PMID: 28458699      PMCID: PMC5403018     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler        ISSN: 1735-3955


Introduction

Coronary angioplasty as a non-surgical procedure is widely used in patients with known indications, and the contrast dye is used to guidewires through the vessels. A known side effect in performing this procedure occurs by means of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), which is the third leading cause of new onset renal failure in hospitalized patients. CIN is defined as a > 25% increase in baseline serum creatinine or > 0.5 mg/dl absolute increase in serum creatinine above baseline within 48 hours of exposure.1 CIN is recognized as one of the complications of contrast media after coronary angiography and angioplasty.1-4 Its incidence ranges from 2% to 50% in low- and high-risk populations, respectively.5 Moreover, CIN incidence is 13% in non-diabetic patients and 20% in diabetics.1 Morbidity, mortality, length of hospitalization, and risk of progression toward end-stage renal disease are increased due to CIN. Dialysis is needed for about 1% of CIN patients and remains permanent in half of these patients.1,5-9 There are some risk factors in developing this complication including, volume and type of contrast media, underlying diseases such as chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure, and also individual factors such as sex, advanced age, anemia, and reduced effective circulation volume;10 CIN pathophysiological mechanism is believed to be related to the changes in renal hemodynamics and damages on tubular cells caused by free radicals or direct toxic effect of the contrast media.11 A recent agent in preventing CIN is pentoxifylline (PTX), a methylxanthine derivative with multiple hematologic properties.11 According to some of its anti-inflammatory properties, PTX is commonly used to treat peripheral vascular diseases. Furthermore, there is evidence that PTX reduces nitric oxide deterioration and scavenging of free radical. However, beneficial effects of PTX in CIN are not fully showed in trials, especially in patients undergoing angioplasty. Spargias et al.12 found that the parenteral use of PTX in patients with septic shock could reduce the serum levels of some inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, plasma level of PTX peaks within 2-3 hours after drug ingestion and its oral absorption is nearly complete. Due to the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of PTX, we hypothesized that its oral administration before contrast media use might be effective in preventing CIN. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of PTX to prevent CIN in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who are subjected for coronary angioplasty.

Materials and Methods

In view of other trials on risk of nephropathy and CIN prevention,13 we calculated sample size of study as 87 in each group considering the significance level of 0.05 to evaluate the efficacy of PTX on prevention of CIN. Patients with ST elevation MI and above 18 years of age who referred for emergency angioplasty to the Interventional Cardiology Department at Imam Reza Hospital, between October 2013 and July 2014, were enrolled into this study. All procedures were performed by a single interventional cardiologist. Exclusion criteria were serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl, heart failure, history of end-stage renal failure or being on dialysis, use of N-acetylcysteine, theophylline, aminoglycosides, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicines, and intravenous contrast media administration within the last 2 days. Besides, patients with pulmonary edema, multiple myeloma, and uncontrolled hypertension were excluded from the study. This study protocol was approved by Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and conforms to the standards currently applied by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial (IRCT2014092819316N1). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial study. The patients were randomly allocated to treatment (PTX) or control group. Paraclinical tests were done in a single hospital laboratory, and laboratory personnel were blinded to the study protocol. In this study, no placebo was administered for the control group. Similar routine preparation for angioplasty, including hydration with normal saline before and after the protocol, was received in both groups before and after the protocol. Normal saline 1-1.5 cc/kg was administered from 6 hours before to 6 hours after procedure. PTX was administrated at a dose of 400 mg 3 times a day from referral day until 24 hours after the procedure in the treatment group. Serum creatinine level was measured for both groups in referral time and after 48 hours of protocol. Serum creatinine was measured with Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON CX5® PRO Clinical System during study protocol. Iso-osmolar nonionic contrast media iodixanol (Vesipaque 320, GE Healthcare, Cork, Ireland) was used for performing coronary angioplasties. Mehran et al.14 introduced a risk prediction score for the development of CIN which we used this to predict the risk of CIN in all patients. Our primary end point was considered as either a minimum of 0.5 mg/dl or 25% increase in serum creatinine above the baseline, 48 hours after exposure to contrast media, which we defined as the occurrence of CIN. The data were analyzed using SPSS software for Windows (version 16, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Normality distribution of quantitative data was checked by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The Chi-square test was applied for comparison of qualitative data between the two groups. Quantitative data were checked if normality distributed in each group using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Then, the independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test was applied for comparison of data between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to control of effect of sex, age, history of hypertension, smoking, diabetes history, and contrast volume on CIN occurrence. All significance tests were two-tailed. P < 0.050 considered as significant level.

Results

In this study, we recruited a total of 175 patients (127 men and 48 women); 91 patients received PTX, and 84 were in the control group (Figure 1). The demographic data and some paraclinical characteristics are presented in table 1. Besides the history of hypertension and the level of hematocrit which were significantly higher in the PTX group than control group (52% vs. 32%; P = 0.020, 43.0 ± 6.7 vs. 41.0 ± 6.6; P = 0.020, respectively), no significant difference was found between the two groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, and biochemical markers including high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride.
Figure 1

Flowchart of the study

Table 1

Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of patients in the two groups

VariablesControl group (n = 84)PTX group (n = 91)P
Age (mean ± SD)57.90 ± 14.2760.46 ± 14.030.270
Height (cm) (mean ± SD)165.00 ± 15.10167.38 ± 8.700.679
Weight (kg) (mean ± SD)71.72 ± 15.6172.53 ± 13.870.233
BMI (kg/m2) (mean ± SD)25.06 ± 3.1325.35 ± 5.250.726
Hematocrit(mean ± SD)42.75 ± 6.7041.33 ± 6.600.020
Hemoglobin (mean ± SD)14.25 ± 1.8313.60 ± 2.340.051
HDL (mean ± SD)37.43 ± 13.7640.25 ± 26.010.430
LDL (mean ± SD)113.20 ± 44.10113.20 ± 39.420.997
TG (mean ± SD)127.90 ± 78.37113.10 ± 59.080.216
Volume of contrast use mm3 (mean ± SD)231.29 ± 105.10190.88 ± 75.820.005
Baseline creatinine (mg/dl) (mean ± SD)1.12 ±0.261.147 ±0.4240.670
Creatinine after procedure (mg/dl) (mean ± SD)1.21 ± 0.361.214 ± 0.4250.990
Difference in creatinine (mg/dl) (mean ± SD)0.09 ± 0.020.066 ± 0.0110.380
Sex (male) [n (%)]66 (79.0)61 (67.0)0.087
Diabetes [n (%)]29 (35.0)41 (45.0)0.076
Hypertension [n (%)]27 (32.0)47 (52.0)0.024
Incidence of CIN [n (%)]8 (9.5)6 (6.6)0.475

BMI: Body mass index; HDL: High-density lipoprotein; LDL: Low-density lipoprotein; TG: Triglyceride; CIN: Contrast-induced nephropathy; PTX: Pentoxifylline; SD: Standard deviation

Vesipaque was the type of contrast media used both in the control and PTX groups. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference between volume of contrast used (P = 0.005). We found that CIN occurred in 14 patients (8%); 8 controls (9.5%) and 6 patients (6.6%) in the PTX group, which was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.475) (Table 1). Regression analysis by backward method with CIN as dependent variable and sex, age, history of hypertension, smoking, diabetes history, and contrast volume as independent variables showed that none of them had significant independent effects on CIN occurrence across the two groups of study. Mean level of hematocrit had nearly significance effect [P = 0.051, odds ratio (OR) = 0.92 (confidence interval (CI) = 0.85-1.00)]. Moreover, the use of PTX had no significant effect on CIN occurrence [P = 0.750, OR = 0.82 (CI = 0.24-2.8)] (Table 2).
Table 2

Regression analysis showing the effect of multiple variables on contrast-induced nephropathy CIN) occurrence after administrating pentoxifylline (PTX)

VariablesOR (95% CI)P
Sex0.695 (0.19-2.59)0.588
Age1.019 (0.98-1.07)0.399
Hypertension0.586 (0.18-1.96)0.386
Diabetes history0.830 (0.17-4.00)0.817
Hematocrit0.924 (0.85-1.00)0.051
Smoking1.437 (0.33-6.26)0.629
Baseline creatinine0.304 (0.042-2.19)0.237
Volume of contrast use1.005 (0.99-1.01)0.083
PTX use0.822 (0.24-2.78)0.750

OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; PTX: Pentoxifylline

Our studied patients did not require any renal replacement therapy; moreover, there was not any hospital mortality in the control and PTX groups.

Discussion

The key finding of this study is that although CIN occurrence was shown to be less in the group with prophylactic oral PTX, this reduction was not significantly different (P = 0.475). There is not any animal study about the preventive effect of PTX in CIN. However, there is only one clinical study about this preventive effect by Firouzi et al. in 2012.15 Similarly, they also found that PTX could reduce, though not significantly, the occurrence of CIN in patients undergoing angioplasty. Our study was single blind, and laboratory staffs that measured the serum creatinine were blinded to the treatment status of the patients. Our patients’ demographic data and baseline risk factors for CIN were similar in the two groups, except for the significantly higher prevalence of hypertension and hematocrit in the PTX group. There was a significant difference in volume of Vesipaque between control and PTX group; however, this was not correlated significantly with the occurrence of CIN which could be the result of selecting patients with normal renal function in this study. Busch et al.5 revealed that the incidence of CIN is significantly lower in low-risk population after coronary angioplasty, and as we excluded patients with creatinine level of more than 1.5 mg/dl, the low incidence of CIN in both groups was predictable. Moreover, we reported the overall incidence of CIN in the control group to be 9.5%. This was recorded 13.69% in Firouzi et al. study,15 which was comparable to the reported incidence of CIN in unselected populations.1 Prophylactic oral administration of PTX showed a trend toward non-significant reduction of CIN occurrence (8 patients in control and 6 patients in PTX group). However, our two groups were not exactly comparable with each other, and after performing the logistic regression analysis, the PTX independent role in reducing CIN was found to be not significant (P = 0.750). In our study, low rate of CIN in both groups and a non-significant difference between the groups could be due to the selection of low-to-moderate risk patients and excluding patients at higher risk. Hence, it is possible that the selection of patients with higher risk would have shown the efficacy of PTX more prominently. In addition, adding PTX to N-acetylcysteine and its synergistic effects in preventing CIN could also be tested which might reduce the probability of CIN.

Conclusion

The authors recommend that oral administration of PTX in patients with myocardial infarction and low-to-moderate risk of CIN undergoing coronary angioplasty has a non-significant reduction effect on CIN. Performing larger trials in higher risk patients is suggested to determine the probable protective role of PTX.
  14 in total

1.  Protective effect of pentoxifylline on contrast induced nephropathy.

Authors:  Jamshid Roozbeh; Alireza Hamidian Jahromi; Maryam Sharifian; Maryam Pakfetrat; Raha Afshariani
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2008-11

2.  B-type natriuretic peptide for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with heart failure undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Xianghua Fu; Xinwei Jia; Xinna Fan; Xinshun Gu; Shiqiang Li; Weili Wu; Weize Fan; Jianling Su; Guozhen Hao; Yunfa Jiang; Ling Xue
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Blocking of Akt/NF-kappaB signaling by pentoxifylline inhibits platelet-derived growth factor-stimulated proliferation in Brown Norway rat airway smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Ya-Ling Chiou; Jeng-Jer Shieh; Ching-Yuang Lin
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality.

Authors:  P A McCullough; R Wolyn; L L Rocher; R N Levin; W W O'Neill
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Charanjit S Rihal; Stephen C Textor; Diane E Grill; Peter B Berger; Henry H Ting; Patricia J Best; Mandeep Singh; Malcolm R Bell; Gregory W Barsness; Verghese Mathew; Kirk N Garratt; David R Holmes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Victoria Ekeløf Busch; Svend Eggert Jensen; Jacob Rosenberg; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Sodium bicarbonate vs sodium chloride for the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Somjot S Brar; Albert Yuh-Jer Shen; Michael B Jorgensen; Adam Kotlewski; Vicken J Aharonian; Natasha Desai; Michael Ree; Ahmed Ijaz Shah; Raoul J Burchette
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation.

Authors:  Roxana Mehran; Eve D Aymong; Eugenia Nikolsky; Zoran Lasic; Ioannis Iakovou; Martin Fahy; Gary S Mintz; Alexandra J Lansky; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; George Dangas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention without acute left ventricular ejection fraction impairment.

Authors:  Stylianos A Pyxaras; Gianfranco Sinagra; Fabio Mangiacapra; Andrea Perkan; Luigi Di Serafino; Giancarlo Vitrella; Serena Rakar; Frederic De Vroey; Sara Santangelo; Alessandro Salvi; Gabor Toth; Jozef Bartunek; Bernard De Bruyne; William Wijns; Emanuele Barbato
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  The preventive effect of pentoxifylline on contrast-induced nephropathy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Vahideh Yavari; Mohammad Ali Ostovan; Javad Kojuri; Raha Afshariani; Alireza Hamidian Jahromi; Alireza Hamidian; Jamshid Roozbeh; Maryam Pakfetrat
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.370

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of contrast-associated acute kidney injury prevention methods; a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khalid Ahmed; Terri McVeigh; Raminta Cerneviciute; Sara Mohamed; Mohammad Tubassam; Mohammad Karim; Stewart Walsh
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Pentoxifylline for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Ling Wei; Weizhi Zhang; Yifeng Yang; Dongping Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evaluation of Crocin Effect on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Following Coronary Angiography or Angioplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lida Shojaei; Shima Esfandiary; Mohammad Rouzbahani; Fatemeh Heydarpour; Mostafa Bahremand; Reza Heidary Moghadam; Ghazal Mahmoudi; Farzaneh Korani; Farshid Raissi; Foroud Shahbazi
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 1.962

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.