Literature DB >> 28457854

The diagnostic value of serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA15-3, and TPS in metastatic breast cancer.

Weigang Wang1, Xiaoqin Xu1, Baoguo Tian1, Yan Wang1, Lili Du1, Ting Sun1, Yanchun Shi1, Xianwen Zhao1, Jiexian Jing2.   

Abstract

This study aims to understand the diagnostic value of serum tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A total of 164 metastatic breast cancer patients in Shanxi Cancer Hospital were recruited between February 2016 and July 2016. 200 breast cancer patients without metastasis in the same period were randomly selected as the control group. The general characteristics, immunohistochemical, and pathological results were investigated between the two groups, and tumor markers were determined. There were statistical differences in the concentration and the positive rates of CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA15-3, and TPS between the MBC and control group (P<0.05). The highest sensitivity was in CEA and the highest specificity was in CA125 for the diagnosis of MBC when using a single tumor marker at 56.7% and 97.0%, respectively. In addition, two tumor markers were used for the diagnosis of MBC and the CEA and TPS combination had the highest diagnostic sensitivity with 78.7%, while the CA15-3 and CA125 combination had the highest specificity of 91.5%. Analysis of tumor markers of 164 MBC found that there were statistical differences in the positive rates of CEA and CA15-3 between bone metastases and other metastases (χ2=6.00, P=0.014; χ2=7.32, P=0.007, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity values of the CEA and CA15-3 combination in the diagnosis of bone metastases were 77.1% and 45.8%, respectively. The positive rate of TPS in the lung metastases group was lower than in other metastases (χ2=8.06, P=0.005).There were significant differences in the positive rates of CA15-3 and TPS between liver metastases and other metastases (χ2=15.42, P<0.001; χ2=9.72, P=0.002, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of the CA15-3 and TPS combination in the diagnosis of liver metastases were 92.3% and 45.6%, respectively, and the positive rate of CEA in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer is lower than in other subtypes (χ2=4.80, P=0.028). Therefore, serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA15-3, and TPS can be used in the diagnosis of MBC, and different combinations of tumor markers have varying diagnostic value.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast carcinoma; Metastasis; Tumor marker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28457854     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  48 in total

1.  Clinical value of serum biomarkers CA153, CEA, and white blood cells in predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Fan; Xiuyuan Chen; Hongjiang Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-11-01

2.  The joint detection of CEA and ctDNA in cerebrospinal fluid: an auxiliary tool for the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases in cancer.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Ningning Luo; Ye Gao; Yaqing Wu; Xueting Qin; Yingxue Qi; Tingting Sun; Rongjie Tao; Chuang Qi; Baoyan Liu; Shuanghu Yuan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Analysis of Pyroptosis-Related Signature for Predicting Prognosis and Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Lincheng Li; Zhaoda Deng; Zhaohui Xiao; Wenbo Zou; Rong Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Significance of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in metastatic breast cancer patients: A prospective study.

Authors:  Thattungal Manoharan Anoop; Rona Joseph P; Saikumar Soman; Steffi Chacko; Mintu Mathew
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 5.  Preclinical Advances in Theranostics for the Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hanyi Fang; Alessandra Cavaliere; Ziqi Li; Yiyun Huang; Bernadette Marquez-Nostra
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Tumour Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Patients With Isolated Involuntary Weight Loss.

Authors:  Jaume Trape; Jordi Aligue; Mireia Vicente; Anna Arnau; Antonio San-Jose; Josep Ordeig; Roser Ordeig; Mariona Bonet; Andres Abril; Omar El-Boutrouki; Carolina Gonzalez-Fernandez; Maria Sala; Cristina Figols; Elisabeth Gonzalez-Garcia; Lourdes Montsant; Domingo Ruiz
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Clinical application of thioredoxin reductase as a novel biomarker in liver cancer.

Authors:  Xuping Wu; Qi Wang; Yousheng Lu; Jinye Zhang; Hanwei Yin; Yongxiang Yi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Huihui Chen; Shijie Wu; Jun Hu; Kun Zhang; Kaimin Hu; Yuexin Lu; Jiapan He; Tao Pan; Yiding Chen
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Construction of a Label-Free Electrochemical Immunosensor Based on Zn-Co-S/Graphene Nanocomposites for Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Detection.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Su; Jia-Hao Tian; Jin-Jia Ye; Han-Wei Chang; Yu-Chen Tsai
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  A DNA methylation-based liquid biopsy for triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Katrina Cristall; Francois-Clement Bidard; Jean-Yves Pierga; Michael J Rauh; Tatiana Popova; Clara Sebbag; Olivier Lantz; Marc-Henri Stern; Christopher R Mueller
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.