Literature DB >> 28457269

Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.

Luiz A G Barbosa1, Eustaquio Araujo2, Rolf G Behrents2, Peter H Buschang3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to evaluate the craniofacial growth of subjects with untreated Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
METHODS: A mixed longitudinal sample of 39 white Class II Division 2 subjects was analyzed at 5 time points: T1 (6 or 7 years), T2 (9 or 10 years), T3 (12 or 13 years), T4 (15 or 16 years), and T5 (18 or 19 years). They were compared with an age- and sex- matched sample of Class I controls. Seventeen measurements (12 angular, 5 proportional) were computed. Multilevel modeling procedures were used to statistically describe the growth changes and to evaluate group differences.
RESULTS: There were no group differences in the relative sizes and anteroposterior positions of the jaws during childhood, adolescence, or early adulthood. Subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion demonstrated significantly (P <0.05) smaller mandibular plane angles, smaller palatal-to-mandibular plane angles, larger posterior-to-anterior facial height ratios, smaller gonial angles, smaller cranial base angles, larger interincisal angles, and more retroclined maxillary incisors than did the Class I subjects. The hypodivergent patterns were established early and became more pronounced over time. Group differences in the mandibular plane angle, palatal-to-mandibular plane angle, gonial angle, interincisal angle, and maxillary incisor-to-cranial base angle, as well as the posterior-to-anterior facial height ratio all increased over time; the difference in the cranial base angle remained unchanged over time. Retroclination of the maxillary incisors occurred primarily during the early mixed dentition.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion are more hypodivergent and have more upright maxillary incisors than do subjects with Class I occlusion. Hypodivergence establishes itself early and increases progressively through early adulthood; maxillary incisor retroclination occurs early.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28457269     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  4 in total

1.  Can Botulinum Toxin-A Contribute to Reconstructing the Physiological Homeostasis of the Masticatory Complex in Short-Faced Patients during Occlusal Therapy? A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Xin Li; Xiaoyan Feng; Juan Li; Xinyu Bao; Jinghong Xu; Jun Lin
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Tooth Position in Wind Instrument Players: Dentofacial Cephalometric Analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Pais Clemente; André Moreira; Catarina Morais; José Manuel Amarante; Afonso Pinhão Ferreira; Joaquim Mendes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Differences in the heritability of craniofacial skeletal and dental characteristics between twin pairs with skeletal Class I and II malocclusions.

Authors:  Heon-Mook Park; Pil-Jong Kim; Joohon Sung; Yun-Mi Song; Hong-Gee Kim; Young Ho Kim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Clinical efficacy of counterclockwise rotating the functional occlusal plane using micro-implant anchorage.

Authors:  Chenxing Zhang; Liqi Xu; Jun Lin
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-04-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.