Literature DB >> 28457169

Arthroscopic Correlates of Subtle Syndesmotic Injury.

Gregory P Guyton1, Kenneth DeFontes1, Cameron R Barr1, Brent G Parks1, Lyn M Camire1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic criteria for identifying syndesmotic disruption have been variable and subjective. We aimed to quantify syndesmotic disruption arthroscopically using a standardized measurement device.
METHODS: Ten cadaveric lower extremity specimens were tested in intact state and after serial sectioning of the syndesmotic structures (anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament [AiTFL], interosseous ligament [IOL], posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament [PiTFL], deltoid). Diagnostic ankle arthroscopy was performed after each sectioning. Manual external rotational stress was applied across the tibiofibular joint. Custom-manufactured spherical balls of increasing diameter mounted on the end of an arthroscopic probe were inserted into the tibiofibular space to determine the degree of diastasis of the tibiofibular joint under each condition.
RESULTS: A ball 3 mm in diameter reliably indicated a high likelihood of combined disruption of the AiTFL and IOL. Disruption of the AiTFL alone could not be reliably distinguished from the intact state.
CONCLUSION: Use of a spherical probe placed into the tibiofibular space during manual external rotation of the ankle provided an objective measure of syndesmotic instability. Passage of a 2.5-mm probe indicated some disruption of the syndesmosis, but the test had poor negative predictive value. Passage of a 3.0-mm spherical probe indicated very high likelihood of disruption of both the AiTFL and the IOL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings challenge the previously used but unsupported standard of a 2-mm diastasis of the tibiofibular articulation for diagnosis of subtle syndesmotic instability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle sprain; arthroscopy; syndesmosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28457169     DOI: 10.1177/1071100716688198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  6 in total

1.  A step-by-step arthroscopic examination of the anterior ankle compartment.

Authors:  J Vega; F Malagelada; J Karlsson; G M Kerkhoffs; M Guelfi; M Dalmau-Pastor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  CORR Insights®: Can Weightbearing Cone-beam CT Reliably Differentiate Between Stable and Unstable Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cesar de Cesar Netto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  The arthroscopic syndesmotic assessment tool can differentiate between stable and unstable ankle syndesmoses.

Authors:  Bart Lubberts; Daniel Guss; Bryan G Vopat; Anne H Johnson; C Niek van Dijk; Hang Lee; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Arthroscopically Assisted Reduction of Sagittal-Plane Disruption of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis.

Authors:  Yiu Ho Sin; Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-04-26

5.  Arthroscopic coronal plane syndesmotic instability has been over-diagnosed.

Authors:  Noortje C Hagemeijer; Mohamed Abdelaziz Elghazy; Gregory Waryasz; Daniel Guss; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Ankle and syndesmosis instability: consensus and controversies.

Authors:  Nuno Corte-Real; João Caetano
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-06-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.