Literature DB >> 28456857

Age effect on prevalence of ultra-high risk for psychosis symptoms: replication in a clinical sample of an early detection of psychosis service.

Frauke Schultze-Lutter1,2, Daniela Hubl3, Benno G Schimmelmann4,5, Chantal Michel4,6.   

Abstract

Higher frequencies of perceptual and lesser clinical significance of non-perceptual attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) have been reported by 8- to 15-year-old of the general population compared to 16- to 40-year-old. We examined if such an age-effect can also be detected in a clinical never-psychotic sample (N = 133) referred to a specialized service for clinical suspicion of developing psychosis. APS and brief intermittent psychotic symptoms (BIPS) were assessed using items P1-P3 and P5 (non-perceptual), and P4 (perceptual) of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes, current axis-I disorders with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, and psychosocial functioning with the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale. In the sample, 64% reported APS (61%) or BIPS (7%); any perceptual APS/BIPS was reported by 43% and any non-perceptual APS/BIPS by 44%. In correspondence to the results in the general population sample, perceptual but not non-perceptual APS/BIPS were significantly more frequent in younger age groups below the age of 16 (8-12 years: odds ratio (OR) = 4.7 (1.1-19.5); 13-15 years: OR = 2.7 (0.9-7.7); 20-24-year-old as reference group). An age-effect of APS/BIPS on the presence of any current axis-I disorder (59%) or functional difficulties (67%) was not detected. However, when onset requirements of APS criteria (onset/worsening in past year) were met, the likelihood of a psychiatric diagnosis increased significantly with advancing age. Overall, the replicated age-effect on perceptual APS/BIPS in this clinical sample highlights the need to examine ways to distinguish clinically relevant perceptual APS/BIPS from perceptual aberrations likely remitting over the course of adolescence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Attenuated psychotic symptoms; Development; Psychosis; Ultra-high risk

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28456857     DOI: 10.1007/s00787-017-0994-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  7 in total

1.  Early detection and intervention of psychosis in children and adolescents: urgent need for studies.

Authors:  Benno G Schimmelmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID).

Authors:  David V Sheehan; Kathy H Sheehan; R Douglas Shytle; Juris Janavs; Yvonne Bannon; Jamison E Rogers; Karen M Milo; Saundra L Stock; Berney Wilkinson
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Psychosis Prevention: A Modified Clinical High Risk Perspective From the Recognition and Prevention (RAP) Program.

Authors:  Barbara A Cornblatt; Ricardo E Carrión; Andrea Auther; Danielle McLaughlin; Ruth H Olsen; Majnu John; Christoph U Correll
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Age matters in the prevalence and clinical significance of ultra-high-risk for psychosis symptoms and criteria in the general population: Findings from the BEAR and BEARS-kid studies.

Authors:  Benno G Schimmelmann; Chantal Michel; Alexandra Martz-Irngartinger; Caroline Linder; Frauke Schultze-Lutter
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  EPA guidance on the early intervention in clinical high risk states of psychoses.

Authors:  S J Schmidt; F Schultze-Lutter; B G Schimmelmann; N P Maric; R K R Salokangas; A Riecher-Rössler; M van der Gaag; A Meneghelli; M Nordentoft; M Marshall; A Morrison; A Raballo; J Klosterkötter; S Ruhrmann
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.361

6.  EPA guidance on the early detection of clinical high risk states of psychoses.

Authors:  F Schultze-Lutter; C Michel; S J Schmidt; B G Schimmelmann; N P Maric; R K R Salokangas; A Riecher-Rössler; M van der Gaag; M Nordentoft; A Raballo; A Meneghelli; M Marshall; A Morrison; S Ruhrmann; J Klosterkötter
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.361

Review 7.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.

Authors:  D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cathy Davies; Andrea Cipriani; John P A Ioannidis; Joaquim Radua; Daniel Stahl; Umberto Provenzani; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 2.  Clinical high risk for psychosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jordina Tor; Montserrat Dolz; Anna Sintes; Daniel Muñoz; Marta Pardo; Elena de la Serna; Olga Puig; Gisela Sugranyes; Inmaculada Baeza
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  An ecological momentary assessment study of age effects on perceptive and non-perceptive clinical high-risk symptoms of psychosis.

Authors:  C Michel; S Lerch; J R Büetiger; R Flückiger; M Cavelti; J Koenig; M Kaess; J Kindler
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Developmental influences on symptom expression in antipsychotic-naïve first-episode psychosis.

Authors:  Miranda Bridgwater; Peter Bachman; Brenden Tervo-Clemmens; Gretchen Haas; Rebecca Hayes; Beatriz Luna; Dean F Salisbury; Maria Jalbrzikowski
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 10.592

5.  Effects of age and sex on clinical high-risk for psychosis in the community.

Authors:  Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Benno G Schimmelmann; Rahel Flückiger; Chantal Michel
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-19

6.  Spontaneous discontinuation of distressing auditory verbal hallucinations in a school-based sample of adolescents: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Vera Brink; Catheleine van Driel; Saliha El Bouhaddani; Klaas J Wardenaar; Lieke van Domburgh; Barbara Schaefer; Marije van Beilen; Agna A Bartels-Velthuis; Wim Veling
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 7.  Establishing a clinical service to prevent psychosis: What, how and when? Systematic review.

Authors:  Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Andrés Estradé; Marcello Cutroni; Olivier Andlauer; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Clinical high-risk criteria of psychosis in 8-17-year-old community subjects and inpatients not suspected of developing psychosis.

Authors:  Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Petra Walger; Maurizia Franscini; Nina Traber-Walker; Naweed Osman; Helene Walger; Benno G Schimmelmann; Rahel Flückiger; Chantal Michel
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-19

9.  Psychopathology-a Precision Tool in Need of Re-sharpening.

Authors:  Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Stefanie J Schmidt; Anastasia Theodoridou
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Isolated hallucination is less predictive than thought disorder in psychosis: Insight from a longitudinal study in a clinical population at high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  TianHong Zhang; LiHua Xu; YingYing Tang; HuiRu Cui; YanYan Wei; XiaoChen Tang; Qiang Hu; Yan Wang; YiKang Zhu; LiJuan Jiang; Li Hui; XiaoHua Liu; ChunBo Li; JiJun Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.