Christian Bommer1, Esther Heesemann2, Vera Sagalova2, Jennifer Manne-Goehler3, Rifat Atun4, Till Bärnighausen5, Sebastian Vollmer6. 1. Department of Economics and Centre for Modern Indian Studies, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany. Electronic address: christian.bommer@wiwi.uni-goettingen.de. 2. Department of Economics and Centre for Modern Indian Studies, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany. 3. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Africa Health Research Institute, Somkhele, South Africa. 6. Department of Economics and Centre for Modern Indian Studies, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differences in methods and data used in past studies have limited comparisons of the cost of illness of diabetes across countries. We estimate the full global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20-79 years in 2015, using a unified framework across all countries. Our objective was to highlight patterns of diabetes-associated costs as well as to identify the need for further research in low-income regions. METHODS: Epidemiological and economic data for 184 countries were used to estimate the global economic burden of diabetes, regardless of diabetes type. Direct costs were derived using a top-down approach based on WHO general health expenditure figures and prevalence data from the 2015 International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. Indirect costs were assessed using a human-capital approach, including diabetes-associated morbidity and premature mortality. FINDINGS: We estimate the global cost of diabetes for 2015 was US$1·31 trillion (95% CI 1·28-1·36) or 1·8% (95% CI 1·8-1·9) of global gross domestic product (GDP). Notably, indirect costs accounted for 34·7% (95% CI 34·7-35·0) of the total burden, although substantial variations existed both in the share and the composition of indirect costs across countries. North America was the most affected region relative to GDP and also the largest contributor to global absolute costs. However, on average, the economic burden as percentage of GDP was larger in middle-income countries than in high-income countries. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest a substantial global economic burden of diabetes. Although limited data were available for low-income and middle-income countries, our findings suggest that large diabetes-associated costs are not only a problem in high-income settings but also affect poorer world regions. FUNDING: None.
BACKGROUND: Differences in methods and data used in past studies have limited comparisons of the cost of illness of diabetes across countries. We estimate the full global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20-79 years in 2015, using a unified framework across all countries. Our objective was to highlight patterns of diabetes-associated costs as well as to identify the need for further research in low-income regions. METHODS: Epidemiological and economic data for 184 countries were used to estimate the global economic burden of diabetes, regardless of diabetes type. Direct costs were derived using a top-down approach based on WHO general health expenditure figures and prevalence data from the 2015 International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. Indirect costs were assessed using a human-capital approach, including diabetes-associated morbidity and premature mortality. FINDINGS: We estimate the global cost of diabetes for 2015 was US$1·31 trillion (95% CI 1·28-1·36) or 1·8% (95% CI 1·8-1·9) of global gross domestic product (GDP). Notably, indirect costs accounted for 34·7% (95% CI 34·7-35·0) of the total burden, although substantial variations existed both in the share and the composition of indirect costs across countries. North America was the most affected region relative to GDP and also the largest contributor to global absolute costs. However, on average, the economic burden as percentage of GDP was larger in middle-income countries than in high-income countries. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest a substantial global economic burden of diabetes. Although limited data were available for low-income and middle-income countries, our findings suggest that large diabetes-associated costs are not only a problem in high-income settings but also affect poorer world regions. FUNDING: None.
Authors: Alexander Chaitoff; Michael B Rothberg; Amy K Windover; Leonard Calabrese; Anita D Misra-Hebert; Kathryn A Martinez Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer A Campbell; Alice Yan; Renee E Walker; Lance Weinhardt; Yang Wang; Rebekah J Walker; Leonard E Egede Journal: Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care Date: 2021-02-28
Authors: Conor Brosnan; Jarlath C Bolger; Eamonn M Bolger; Michael E Kelly; Roisin Tully; Mohamed AlAzzawi; William B Robb Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Anna Norhammar; Johan Bodegard; Thomas Nyström; Marcus Thuresson; Klas Rikner; David Nathanson; Jan W Eriksson Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 6.577