| Literature DB >> 28455724 |
Ken Kusama1, Yuki Okamoto1, Keiko Saito1, Tsukasa Kasahara1, Teizo Murata1, Yasushi Ueno1, Yuka Kobayashi2, Yoshihiro Kamada3, Eiji Miyoshi3.
Abstract
An increase in Lewis- and core-type fucosylation of haptoglobin has been reported in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC), suggesting that fucosylated haptoglobin is a candidate PC biomarker. Previously, we developed a Pholiota squarrosa lectin antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PhoSL-ELISA) system for the detection of core-fucosylated haptoglobin. However, with this methodology, positive results were only obtained for some patients with PC, demonstrating the need for a more sensitive detection system. In the current study, we developed an improved PhoSL-ELISA system with higher sensitivity to detect core-fucosylated haptoglobin using high-concentration urea as a denaturing agent with lectin to facilitate detection. We then reevaluated the performance of PhoSL reactive-core-fucosylated haptoglobin (PhoSL-HP) as a PC biomarker using the improved PhoSL-ELISA system. PhoSL-HP levels in the sera of patients with PC were significantly higher than those in healthy volunteers, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.753. Furthermore, the AUC value of CA19-9 improved from 0.793 to 0.907 when combined with PhoSL-HP. Additionally, several CA19-9-negative cases among the patients with PC were diagnosed as positive for PhoSL-HP. In conclusion, PhoSL-HP detection using our improved ELISA system might allow PhoSL-HP to serve as a potential biomarker for PC and thus might be useful to complement the detection of CA19-9 in PC diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: CA19–9; Denaturation; Elisa; Fucosylated haptoglobin; Pancreatic cancer; Pholiota squarrosa lectin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28455724 PMCID: PMC5502058 DOI: 10.1007/s10719-017-9772-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glycoconj J ISSN: 0282-0080 Impact factor: 2.916
Characteristics of the subjects in this study
| No. | Age (range, years) | Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy volunteers (HVs) | 40 | 55.7 (37–72) | 25 | 15 |
| Pancreatic cancer (PC) | 34 | 59.4 (37–72) | 14 | 20 |
| Stage I | 4 | 67.0 (63–72) | 0 | 4 |
| Stage II | 9 | 58.6 (37–70) | 2 | 7 |
| Stage III | 9 | 58.1 (52–70) | 5 | 4 |
| Stage IV | 12 | 58.3 (37–71) | 7 | 5 |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) | 7 | 67.4 (54–77) | 3 | 4 |
| Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) | 5 | 60.4 (47–73) | 4 | 1 |
| Chronic pancreatitis (CP) | 24 | 59.0 (51–70) | 9 | 15 |
Fig. 1Measurement of standard haptoglobin using biotinylated PhoSL. (Method 1) Standard curve of the lectin-antibody ELISA using biotinylated PhoSL. The conditioned medium from a PC cell line, PK8, transfected with the haptoglobin expression vector was used as a standard using a previously reported procedure [11]. (Method 2) Standard curve of the lectin-antibody ELISA using biotinylated PhoSL. Purified haptoglobin from the conditioned medium of HepG2 cells was used as a standard. (Method 3) Standard curve of the lectin-antibody ELISA using biotinylated PhoSL under denaturing conditions. Purified haptoglobin from the conditioned medium of HepG2 cells was used as a standard
Fig. 2Serum levels of PhoSL-HP in healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). a Boxplot analysis for the evaluation of PhoSL-HP as a PC biomarker using the previous PhoSL-ELISA system (Method 1) and a newly developed PhoSL-ELISA system (Methods 2 and 3). HVs (n = 40) and patients with PC in stage I (n = 4), stage II (n = 9), stage III (n = 9), and stage IV (n = 12) were investigated. The x-axis indicates the case classification, and the y-axis indicates the PhoSL-HP level (U/mL). Significant differences among the three states were determined using Steel-Dwass tests; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. n.s., not significant. The boxes indicate interquartile ranges for each group of specimens. The bar represents the median value. b Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) values for PhoSL-HP for distinguishing patients with PC from HVs (Method 3, a newly developed PhoSL-ELISA system)
Fig. 3Efficacy of CA19–9 and PhoSL-HP for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC). a Boxplot analysis of CA19–9. Healthy volunteers (HVs) (n = 40) and patients with PC in stage I (n = 4), stage II (n = 9), stage III (n = 9), and stage IV (n = 12) were investigated. The x-axis indicates the case classification, and the y-axis indicates the CA19–9 level (U/mL). Significant differences among the three states were determined using Steel-Dwass tests; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001. n.s., not significant. The boxes indicate interquartile ranges for each group of specimens. The bar represents the median value. b Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) values for CA19–9. c ROC curve and AUC values for the PhoSL-HP and CA19–9 combined analysis for distinguishing patients with PC from HVs
Combined analysis with PhoSL-HP and CA19–9 in patients with PC
| Patients | CA19–9 (Cut off: 37 U/mL) | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| True positive | False negative | |||
| PhoSL-HP | True positive | 10 (3*) | 9 (4*) | 19 (7*) |
| False negative | 12 (4*) | 3 (2*) | 15 (6*) | |
| Total | 22 (7*) | 12 (6*) | 34 (13*) | |
*Early-stage cases (stages I and II)