PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidences of hyponatremia in adult postoperative critically ill patients receiving isotonic and hypotonic maintenance fluids. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective before/after observational study, we included patients who had undergone an elective operation for esophageal cancer or for head and neck cancer and who received postoperative intensive care for >48 h from August 2014 to July 2016. In those patients, sodium-poor solution (35 mmol/L of sodium; Na35) had been administered as maintenance fluid until July 2015. From August 2015, the protocol for postoperative maintenance fluid was revised to the use of isotonic fluid (140 mmol/L of sodium; Na140). The primary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia (<135 mmol/L) until the morning of postoperative day (POD) 2. RESULTS: We included 179 patients (Na35: 87 patients, Na140: 92 patients) in the current study. The mean volume of fluid received from ICU admission to POD 2 was not significantly different between the two groups (3291 vs 3337 mL, p = 0.84). The incidence of postoperative hyponatremia was 16.3% (15/92) in the Na140 cohort, which was significantly lower than that of 52.9% (46/87) in the Na35 group (odds ratio = 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.35, p < 0.001]. The incidences of hypernatremia, defined as serum sodium concentration >145 mmol/L, were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, the use of intravenous maintenance fluid with 35 mmol/L of sodium was significantly associated with an increased risk of hyponatremia compared to that with 140 mmol/L of sodium in adult postoperative critically ill patients.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidences of hyponatremia in adult postoperative critically illpatients receiving isotonic and hypotonic maintenance fluids. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective before/after observational study, we included patients who had undergone an elective operation for esophageal cancer or for head and neck cancer and who received postoperative intensive care for >48 h from August 2014 to July 2016. In those patients, sodium-poor solution (35 mmol/L of sodium; Na35) had been administered as maintenance fluid until July 2015. From August 2015, the protocol for postoperative maintenance fluid was revised to the use of isotonic fluid (140 mmol/L of sodium; Na140). The primary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia (<135 mmol/L) until the morning of postoperative day (POD) 2. RESULTS: We included 179 patients (Na35: 87 patients, Na140: 92 patients) in the current study. The mean volume of fluid received from ICU admission to POD 2 was not significantly different between the two groups (3291 vs 3337 mL, p = 0.84). The incidence of postoperative hyponatremia was 16.3% (15/92) in the Na140 cohort, which was significantly lower than that of 52.9% (46/87) in the Na35 group (odds ratio = 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.35, p < 0.001]. The incidences of hypernatremia, defined as serum sodium concentration >145 mmol/L, were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, the use of intravenous maintenance fluid with 35 mmol/L of sodium was significantly associated with an increased risk of hyponatremia compared to that with 140 mmol/L of sodium in adult postoperative critically illpatients.
Authors: Jeremy N Friedman; Carolyn E Beck; Julie DeGroot; Denis F Geary; Daniel J Sklansky; Stephen B Freedman Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Sarah McNab; Robert S Ware; Kristen A Neville; Karen Choong; Mark G Coulthard; Trevor Duke; Andrew Davidson; Tavey Dorofaeff Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-12-18
Authors: Aaron J Feinstein; John Davis; Lyndon Gonzalez; Keith E Blackwell; Elliot Abemayor; Abie H Mendelsohn Journal: Head Neck Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Arthur Greenberg; Joseph G Verbalis; Alpesh N Amin; Volker R Burst; Joseph A Chiodo; Jun R Chiong; Joseph F Dasta; Keith E Friend; Paul J Hauptman; Alessandro Peri; Samuel H Sigal Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 10.612