Literature DB >> 28455472

Anterior knee pain and evidence of osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint should not be considered contraindications to mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up.

T W Hamilton1, H G Pandit2, D G Maurer1, S J Ostlere3, C Jenkins4, S J Mellon1, C A F Dodd4, D W Murray5.   

Abstract

AIMS: It is not clear whether anterior knee pain and osteoarthritis (OA) of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) are contraindications to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Our aim was to investigate the long-term outcome of a consecutive series of patients, some of whom had anterior knee pain and PFJ OA managed with UKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the ten-year functional outcomes and 15-year implant survival of 805 knees (677 patients) following medial mobile-bearing UKA. The intra-operative status of the PFJ was documented and, with the exception of bone loss with grooving to the lateral side, neither the clinical or radiological state of the PFJ nor the presence of anterior knee pain were considered a contraindication. The impact of radiographic findings and anterior knee pain was studied in a subgroup of 100 knees (91 patients).
RESULTS: There was no relationship between functional outcomes, at a mean of ten years, or 15-year implant survival, and pre-operative anterior knee pain, or the presence or degree of cartilage loss documented intra-operatively at the medial patella or trochlea, or radiographic evidence of OA in the medial side of the PFJ. In 6% of cases there was full thickness cartilage loss on the lateral side of the patella. In these cases, the overall ten-year function and 15-year survival was similar to those without cartilage loss; however they had slightly more difficulty with descending stairs. Radiographic signs of OA seen in the lateral part of the PFJ were not associated with a definite compromise in functional outcome or implant survival.
CONCLUSION: Severe damage to the lateral side of the PFJ with bone loss and grooving remains a contraindication to mobile-bearing UKA. Less severe damage to the lateral side of the PFJ and damage to the medial side, however severe, does not compromise the overall function or survival, so should not be considered to be a contraindication. However, if a patient does have full thickness cartilage loss on the lateral side of the PFJ they may have a slight compromise in their ability to descend stairs. Pre-operative anterior knee pain also does not compromise the functional outcome or survival and should not be considered to be a contraindication. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:632-9. ©2017 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional outcome; Implant survival; Indications; Patellofemoral joint; Patient selection; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28455472     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0695.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  21 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: No Differences in Outcomes Scores or Survivorship of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Patients Younger or Older than 55 Years of Age at Minimum 10-year Followup.

Authors:  Alexander D Liddle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does Medial Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Influence Outcome Scores and Risk of Revision After Fixed-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Y Berger; S Ftaita; E Thienpont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  High Prevalence of Isolated Antero-medial Osteoarthritis (AMOA) in Indian Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adarsh Annapareddy; Deepesh Daultani; Praharsha Mulpur; Vishesh Khanna; Sukesh Rao Sankineani; Krishna Kiran Eachempati; A V Gurava Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Limb position influences component orientation in Oxford mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an experimental cadaveric study.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar; Shantanu Patil; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Update on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications and failure modes.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Alexander Antoniadis; Naeder Helmy
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-08-01

6.  Increase in the Tibial Slope in Unicondylar Knee Replacement: Analysis of the Effect on the Kinematics and Ligaments in a Weight-Bearing Finite Element Model.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Matthias Woiczinski; Arnd Steinbrück; Florian Schmidutz; Thomas Niethammer; Christian Schröder; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Effects of contact stress on patellarfemoral joint and quadriceps force in fixed and mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hyuck Min Kwon; Jin-Ah Lee; Yong-Gon Koh; Kwan Kyu Park; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Robotic-arm assisted medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with navigation control: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Jenni Tahmassebi; Atif Ayuob; Peter D Moriarty; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Boonchana Pongcharoen; Nuttawut Chanalithichai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications, technical issues and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.