Literature DB >> 28455170

Two-dose schedules for human papillomavirus vaccine: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maddalena D'Addario1, Shelagh Redmond1, Pippa Scott2, Dianne Egli-Gany1, A Ximena Riveros-Balta3, Ana Maria Henao Restrepo3, Nicola Low4.   

Abstract

Simpler schedules for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine delivery could improve vaccine coverage and the effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention. The objective of this study was to systematically review evidence about the effects of two-dose compared with three-dose schedules for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and to describe the uptake of two-dose HPV vaccination schedules globally. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, trials registers, and manufacturers' databases from their earliest date to February 2016. We selected randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials that directly compared HPV vaccine schedules with two or three doses. We extracted data on immunological and clinical outcomes and used meta-analysis where appropriate. We also described the use of two-dose HPV vaccine schedules globally. We screened 1464 items and included seven eligible noninferiority trials in 11 countries. In randomised comparisons amongst adolescent girls (three trials), geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of antibodies against HPV16 and HPV18 were non-inferior or inconclusive, up to 24months after a two-dose compared with a three-dose schedule. One trial with a clinical outcome found no persistent HPV infections occurred after either two or three doses. In non-randomised comparisons, GMC were non-inferior or superior in adolescent girls receiving the two-dose schedule compared with women receiving the three-dose schedule for at least 21months after vaccination. By February 2017, 23 low and middle income and 25 high income countries had adopted a two-dose HPV vaccination schedule. A two-dose HPV vaccine schedule provides satisfactory immunological outcomes in adolescent girls, but uptake globally is limited, particularly in countries with the highest burden of cervical cancer.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human papillomavirus vaccines; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Vaccination; Vaccine schedules

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28455170     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  14 in total

1.  HPV Vaccination in Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Undergoing Excisional Treatment: Insights into Unsolved Questions.

Authors:  Carla Henere; Aureli Torné; Anna Llupià; Marta Aldea; Cristina Martí; Ariel Glickman; Adela Saco; Lorena Marimon; Carolina Manzotti; Natalia Rakislova; Jaume Ordi; Marta Del Pino
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Comparison of different human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine types and dose schedules for prevention of HPV-related disease in females and males.

Authors:  Hanna Bergman; Brian S Buckley; Gemma Villanueva; Jennifer Petkovic; Chantelle Garritty; Vittoria Lutje; Alina Ximena Riveros-Balta; Nicola Low; Nicholas Henschke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-22

3.  School-based delivery of routinely recommended vaccines and opportunities to check vaccination status at school, a global summary, 2008-2017.

Authors:  Leora R Feldstein; Garrett Fox; Abigail Shefer; Laura M Conklin; Kirsten Ward
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Early use of the HPV 2-dose vaccination schedule: Leveraging evidence to support policy for accelerated impact.

Authors:  Vladimir Gilca; Jorge Salmerón-Castro; Chantal Sauvageau; Gina Ogilvie; Monique Landry; Monica Naus; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Adverse events associated with human papillomavirus vaccines: a protocol for systematic review with network meta-analysis incorporating all randomised controlled trials comparing with placebo, adjuvants and other vaccines.

Authors:  Jiro Takeuchi; Hisashi Noma; Yuta Sakanishi; Takashi Kawamura
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Effect of hyperoside on cervical cancer cells and transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Weikang Guo; Hui Yu; Lu Zhang; Xiuwei Chen; Yunduo Liu; Yaoxian Wang; Yunyan Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.722

7.  Is one dose of human papillomavirus vaccine as effective as three?: A national cohort analysis.

Authors:  Julia Ml Brotherton; Alison Budd; Christopher Rompotis; Natasha Bartlett; Michael J Malloy; Rachael L Andersen; Kim Ar Coulter; Peter W Couvee; Nerida Steel; Gail H Ward; Marion Saville
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2019-07-15

8.  Improvement of Parent's awareness, knowledge, perception, and acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination after a structured-educational intervention.

Authors:  Mei Neni Sitaresmi; Nisrina Maulida Rozanti; Lamria Besty Simangunsong; Abdul Wahab
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Lan Xu; Cindy Simoens; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09

10.  Persistence of Immunity When Using Different Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Schedules and Booster-Dose Effects 5 Years After Primary Vaccination.

Authors:  Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Leticia Torres-Ibarra; Aurelio Cruz-Valdez; Jorge Salmerón; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Javier Prado-Galbarro; Margaret Stanley; Nubia Muñoz; Rolando Herrero; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.