Yuting Chen1, Brenda McCabe2, Douglas Hyatt3. 1. Construction Engineering & Management Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: yut.chen@mail.utoronto.ca. 2. Construction Engineering & Management Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: brenda.mccabe@utoronto.ca. 3. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: Hyatt@Rotman.Utoronto.Ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The construction industry has hit a plateau in terms of safety performance. Safety climate is regarded as a leading indicator of safety performance; however, relatively little safety climate research has been done in the Canadian construction industry. Safety climate may be geographically sensitive, thus it is necessary to examine how the construct of safety climate is defined and used to improve safety performance in different regions. On the other hand, more and more attention has been paid to job related stress in the construction industry. Previous research proposed that individual resilience may be associated with a better safety performance and may help employees manage stress. Unfortunately, few empirical research studies have examined this hypothesis. This paper aims to examine the role of safety climate and individual resilience in safety performance and job stress in the Canadian construction industry. METHOD: The research was based on 837 surveys collected in Ontario between June 2015 and June 2016. Structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques were used to explore the impact of individual resilience and safety climate on physical safety outcomes and on psychological stress among construction workers. RESULTS: The results show that safety climate not only affected construction workers' safety performance but also indirectly affected their psychological stress. In addition, it was found that individual resilience had a direct negative impact on psychological stress but had no impact on physical safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the roles of both organizational and individual factors in individual safety performance and in psychological well-being. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Construction organizations need to not only monitor employees' safety performance, but also to assess their employees' psychological well-being. Promoting a positive safety climate together with developing training programs focusing on improving employees' psychological health - especially post-trauma psychological health - can improve the safety performance of an organization.
INTRODUCTION: The construction industry has hit a plateau in terms of safety performance. Safety climate is regarded as a leading indicator of safety performance; however, relatively little safety climate research has been done in the Canadian construction industry. Safety climate may be geographically sensitive, thus it is necessary to examine how the construct of safety climate is defined and used to improve safety performance in different regions. On the other hand, more and more attention has been paid to job related stress in the construction industry. Previous research proposed that individual resilience may be associated with a better safety performance and may help employees manage stress. Unfortunately, few empirical research studies have examined this hypothesis. This paper aims to examine the role of safety climate and individual resilience in safety performance and job stress in the Canadian construction industry. METHOD: The research was based on 837 surveys collected in Ontario between June 2015 and June 2016. Structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques were used to explore the impact of individual resilience and safety climate on physical safety outcomes and on psychological stress among construction workers. RESULTS: The results show that safety climate not only affected construction workers' safety performance but also indirectly affected their psychological stress. In addition, it was found that individual resilience had a direct negative impact on psychological stress but had no impact on physical safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the roles of both organizational and individual factors in individual safety performance and in psychological well-being. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Construction organizations need to not only monitor employees' safety performance, but also to assess their employees' psychological well-being. Promoting a positive safety climate together with developing training programs focusing on improving employees' psychological health - especially post-trauma psychological health - can improve the safety performance of an organization.
Authors: Nobuki Hashiguchi; Jianfei Cao; Yeongjoo Lim; Yasushi Kubota; Shigeo Kitahara; Shuichi Ishida; Kota Kodama Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mikkel Brandt; Emil Sundstrup; Lars L Andersen; Ninna Maria Wilstrup; Jeppe Z N Ajslev Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mats Hedsköld; Magna Andreen Sachs; Torleif Rosander; Mia von Knorring; Karin Pukk Härenstam Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 2.655