| Literature DB >> 28454636 |
Reshmi Udesh1, Amol Mehta1, Thomas Gleason2, Parthasarathy D Thirumala3.
Abstract
To study the role of carotid stenosis (CS) and cerebrovascular disease as independent risk factors for perioperative stroke following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used for our study. All patients who underwent SAVR from 1999 to 2011 were identified using ICD-9 codes. Univariate and multivariate analysis of baseline characteristics, Elixhauser comorbidities and other covariates were examined to identify independent predictors of perioperative strokes following SAVR. Data on 50,979 patients who underwent SAVR from 1999 to 2011 was obtained. The mean age of the study cohort was 60.5. The study patients were predominantly Caucasian (79.3%) and males (60.01%). The incidence of perioperative stroke was 2.48%. CS (OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.1-2.8, p=0.009) and cerebral arterial occlusion (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3-8.9) significantly increased perioperative stroke risk following SAVR. Infective endocarditis (OR 4.6, 95%CI 3.8-5.6, p=0.00) and neurological disorders (OR 4.8, 95% CI 4-5.8, p=0.00) appeared to be the strongest risk factors for strokes. Other risk factors found to be significant predictors of perioperative strokes (p<0.05) were - age, higher VWR scores, CS, cerebral arterial occlusion, infective endocarditis, DM, HTN, renal failure, neurological disorders, coagulopathy and hypothyroidsm. In conclusion, perioperative stroke risk has remained more or less constant despite advancements in surgical techniques with risk having gone up in patients <65years of age. CS and cerebral arterial occlusion significantly increase stroke risk following SAVR. Improved patient selection with pre-operative risk stratification and institution of preventive strategies are necessary to improve operative outcomes following SAVR.Entities:
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Carotid artery disease; Carotid stenosis; Perioperative stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28454636 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Neurosci ISSN: 0967-5868 Impact factor: 1.961