Literature DB >> 28454511

Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica: Two-year results of a randomised controlled trial.

Patrick A Brouwer1,2, Ronald Brand3, M Elske van den Akker-van Marle4, Wilco Ch Jacobs5, Barry Schenk1, Annette A van den Berg-Huijsmans1, Bart W Koes6, Mark A Arts5,7, M A van Buchem1, Wilco C Peul5,7.   

Abstract

Background Percutaneous laser disc decompression is a minimally invasive treatment, for lumbar disc herniation and might serve as an alternative to surgical management of sciatica. In a randomised trial with two-year follow-up we assessed the clinical effectiveness of percutaneous laser disc decompression compared to conventional surgery. Materials and methods This multicentre randomised prospective trial with a non-inferiority design, was carried out according to an intent-to-treat protocol with full institutional review board approval. One hundred and fifteen eligible surgical candidates, with sciatica from a disc herniation smaller than one-third of the spinal canal, were randomly allocated to percutaneous laser disc decompression ( n = 55) or conventional surgery ( n = 57). The main outcome measures for this trial were the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for sciatica, visual analogue scores for back and leg pain and the patient's report of perceived recovery. Results The primary outcome measures showed no significant difference or clinically relevant difference between the two groups at two-year follow-up. The re-operation rate was 21% in the surgery group, which is relatively high, and with an even higher 52% in the percutaneous laser disc decompression group. Conclusion At two-year follow-up, a strategy of percutaneous laser disc decompression, followed by surgery if needed, resulted in non-inferior outcomes compared to a strategy of microdiscectomy. Although the rate of reoperation in the percutaneous laser disc decompression group was higher than expected, surgery could be avoided in 48% of those patients that were originally candidates for surgery. Percutaneous laser disc decompression, as a non-surgical method, could have a place in the treatment arsenal of sciatica caused by contained herniated discs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive; disk herniation; laser; percutaneous laser disc decompression; spine intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28454511      PMCID: PMC5490869          DOI: 10.1177/1591019917699981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  30 in total

1.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Jonathan S Skinner; William A Abdu; Alan S Hilibrand; Scott D Boden; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Percutaneous laser disk decompression: a review of the literature.

Authors:  B Schenk; P A Brouwer; W C Peul; M A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; W C Peul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-06-23

Review 4.  Sciatica: review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates.

Authors:  Kika Konstantinou; Kate M Dunn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A minimally invasive treatment for lumbar disc herniation: DiscoGel® chemonucleolysis in patients unresponsive to chemonucleolysis with oxygen-ozone.

Authors:  S Stagni; F de Santis; L Cirillo; M Dall'olio; C Princiotta; L Simonetti; A Stafa; M Leonardi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 6.  The role of radiology in percutaneous laser disc decompression.

Authors:  J A Botsford
Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg       Date:  1995-06

7.  Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; M Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Ronald H M A Bartels; W F Tan; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  L C L Ng; P Sell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

9.  Image-guided percutaneous laser disk decompression for herniated lumbar disks: a 4-year follow-up in 200 patients.

Authors:  D H W Grönemeyer; H Buschkamp; M Braun; S Schirp; P A Weinsheimer; A Gevargez
Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg       Date:  2003-06

10.  Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; M Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Ronald H M A Bartels; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

1.  Letter to the editor regarding 'Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica: Two-year results of a randomised controlled trial'.

Authors:  Kris E Radcliff; Greg Schroeder
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  [Operative treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine].

Authors:  M Czabanka; C Thomé; F Ringel; B Meyer; S-O Eicker; V Rohde; M Stoffel; P Vajkoczy
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus microdiscectomy for sciatica: Cost utility analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Patrick A Brouwer; Ronald Brand; Bart Koes; Wilbert B van den Hout; Mark A van Buchem; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolong Chen; Uphar Chamoli; Samuel Lapkin; Jose Vargas Castillo; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Chinese Association for the Study of Pain: Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang Cheng; Yong-Jun Zheng; Zhi-Ying Feng; Hong-Wei Fang; Jin-Yuan Zhang; Xiang-Rui Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Outcomes with transforaminal endoscopic versus percutaneous laser decompression for contained lumbar herniated disc: a survival analysis of treatment benefit.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira de Carvalho; André Luiz Calderaro; Thiago Soares Dos Santos; Marlon Sudário de Lima E Silva; Paulo de Carvalho; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

7.  Comparison of percutaneous intradiscal ozone injection with laser disc decompression in discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Poupak Rahimzadeh; Farnad Imani; Mohammad Ghahremani; Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.133

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.